Community needs a strategy
Published 6:41 am Thursday, June 10, 2010
Passion alone won’t save the Collins Building, the 84-year-old, 60,000-square-foot former casket factory on the Everett waterfront.
It will also take roughly $11 million to restore the historic structure, and an economically viable, sustainable plan for its operation. That, according to the state’s historic preservation officer, almost certainly means finding a committed, visionary and well-funded private developer.
Passion was in ample supply during an all-day session at Everett Station on Saturday that laid out the key issues regarding the Collins Building’s future. The other key ingredients were identified, but remained elusive.
Commissioners from the Port of Everett, which owns the building, hosted the instructive and well-attended meeting, and now must decide how to proceed.
They do have options:
Whether the Collins Building is eventually preserved or removed, though, a key observation made by Tim Thompson, the moderator of Saturday’s session, will remain valid: As a community, Everett should more effectively channel its passion for historic preservation.
Thompson, a consultant who has been involved in the preservation of historic buildings in Tacoma, said he detected a lack of consensus in the community about which buildings are important to save. Frustration over a perceived lack of preservation is focused on the Collins Building now, he noted, but a broader discussion is needed.
The city of Everett could push that, as government leaders have done successfully in Tacoma.
The city’s Historical Commission produced a master list of historic properties in the downtown area two years ago. That could be a good starting point for city officials to sit down with members of Historic Everett and other interested entities to develop strategies for identifying and preserving historic buildings throughout the city.
A desirable result would be a rational, open, even-handed way to prioritize what’s worth saving, and renovating — perhaps with some contribution of public resources.
Perceptions of favoritism, like those that followed the City Council’s decision to renovate the former Key Bank building for a children’s theater, would be minimized by a consistent, transparent process. And buildings with the deepest historical significance would be more likely to get the attention they truly deserve.
