Celebrate effort of ‘bureaucrats’ fighting coronavirus outbreak

In the midst of the angst over the coronavirus, there’s one takeaway over which no one ought to disagree: Government really is here to help. Virtually every newspaper article, every cable news story and every online update routinely mentions the professionals from the U.S Public Health Service and the scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Here in Washington, the Department of Health has deployed investigators and supervised quarantine procedures, while county health officials, school district leaders and first responders continue to serve on the front lines to limit exposure to the virus.

All of them are government “bureaucrats,” to reference a pejorative too many of us casually embrace. We proudly vote for tax cuts, we insist that government is too expensive and we’re convinced that many agencies could be scaled back or even eliminated altogether; until a crisis hits, and then we demand that government solve the problem immediately, if not sooner.

Maybe we ought to demand with equal fervor that we fully fund our public health agencies, our federal research initiatives and our state, county and local “bureaucrats” working with diligence to protect the rest of us.

Dan Murphy

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — Supporters of President Donald Trump storm the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021. The Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump enjoyed broad immunity from prosecution over official acts has opened the possibility that more evidence in his attempt to subvert the 2020 election could be revealed in public court filings — maybe even before the upcoming presidential election. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Editorial: As important as voting is acceptance of voters’ will

Regardless of outcome, voters must acknowledge the result, then work within democracy’s framework.

Vote 2024 logo with red and blue text for US presidential election. Election sticker, badge, label, poster, banner, greeting card. Stars and USA flag red strips Vector illustration.
Editorial: A recap of Herald Editorial Board endorsements

The editorial board recommends the following candidates and votes on measures on the Nov. 5 ballot.

We must team up against the climate crisis

My name is Casey and I am a seventh grader at Maplewood… Continue reading

Don’t forget indoor pollution sources from gas

Thank you for the excellent article regarding increased asthma risks in Snohomish… Continue reading

Goldberg: Has the scale of women’s fury been underestimated?

The surprise results of an Iowa poll hint at the possibility of the strength of women in the election.

Comment: Once the ballots are cast, the law must prevail

Americans across the political spectrum share a duty to support the peaceful transition of power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A wall diagram shows the “journey of the ballot” at the new Elections Center on Tuesday, July 9, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Holding confidence in process, results of election

Election officials have worked to make the process transparent to remove doubts about its integrity.

Comment: Whole world is watching, anxious over U.S. election

As much as events will turn on the outcome, any chaos over the results could make things even worse.

Krugman: What to make of a weak jobs report

Rather than a sign of recession, it may show the economy’s getting the soft landing that many hoped for.

Gina Forbush, of Gig Harbor, Wash., reacting to news that striking Boeing machinists had rejected a tentative labor contract, at the IAM 751 Union Hall in Seattle on Oct. 23, 2024. Boeing’s largest union rejected a tentative labor contract on Wednesday by a wide margin, extending a damaging strike and adding to the mounting financial problems facing the company, which hours earlier had reported a $6.1 billion loss. (M. Scott Brauer/The New York Times)
Comment: Why didn’t shareholders rein in Boeing mismanagement?

Shareholders could have corrected some of the company’s errors, but buybacks kept them mollified.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.