Comment: The case for voting early and by mail or drop box

Research shows that early voting and voting by mail is fair and may encourage more people to vote.

By Howard Manly and Matt Williams / For The Conversation

As political campaigning for the midterm elections ramps up, millions of voters are considering how they should cast their ballots on Nov. 8. In addition to the traditional way of voting at their local precinct on Election Day, many have the option to vote earlier by mail.

With the exception of Alabama, Connecticut, Mississippi and New Hampshire, early voting is allowed in 46 states and is offered in different forms such as drop boxes, mail or early voting in person. Washington state voters should receive their ballots in the mail after Oct. 20.

It’s important to check with your state’s election office, because different states have different deadlines and options available.

In Montana, for instance, early voting is allowed for about four weeks between Oct. 11 and Nov. 7. But in Texas, the early-voting period is only the 10 weekdays between Oct. 24 and Nov. 4.

The Conversation U.S. has published several articles looking at not only the integrity of early voting but also the larger question of turning out the vote.

The long, long history of early voting: Early voting periods are as old as presidential elections in the U.S.

The first presidential election occurred in 1789 and started on Dec. 15, 1788. It ended almost a month later, on Jan. 10, 1789, with the election of George Washington.

It wasn’t until 1845 that Congress adopted the Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the national Election Day.

Given the long history, Terri Bimes, an associate teaching professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley, raises an interesting point on the impact of early voting on turnout.

“While some scholars contend that early in-person voting periods potentially can decrease voter turnout,” Bimes writes, “studies that focus on vote-by-mail, a form of early voting, generally show an increase in voter turnout.”

Regardless of overall turnout, more and more voters are choosing nontraditional ways of casting their ballots. In the 2020 election, for instance, 69 percent of voters nationwide voted by mail or through another means earlier than Election Day. That number was 40 percent in 2016.

Is early voting safe? Election fraud is rare.

And mail-in ballot fraud is even rarer.

The conservative Heritage Foundation conducted a survey in 2020 and found 1,200 “proven instances of voter fraud” since 2000, with 1,100 criminal convictions over those two decades.

Only 204 allegations, and 143 convictions, involved mail-in ballots; even with more than 250 million mail-in ballots cast since 2000.

Edie Goldenberg is a University of Michigan political scientist who belongs to a National Academy of Public Administration working group that offered recommendations to ensure voter participation and public confidence during the onset of the covid-19 pandemic in 2020.

Goldenberg writes: “The evidence we reviewed finds that voting by mail is rarely subject to fraud, does not give an advantage to one political party over another and can in fact inspire public confidence in the voting process, if done properly.”

Voting turnout is key to democracy: More people voted in the 2020 presidential election than in any election in the past 120 years, even as nearly one-third of eligible voters sat it out. That means nearly 80 million Americans did not vote.

Among the reasons nonvoters gave were not being registered, not being interested or not believing their vote made a difference. Despite such apathy, about 155 million voters — that’s 67 percent of Americans over 18 — did vote in 2020.

Part of the problem of reducing the percentage of nonvoters at the street level can be getting people to answer their doors to strangers or answering a telephone call placed by a campaign volunteer from an unrecognized number. Before the pandemic, an effective door-to-door campaign could increase turnout by almost 10 percent; a well-run phone campaign could add an additional 5 percent.

When University of California, Berkeley’s Vice Provost for Graduate Studies Lisa García Bedolla began studying voter mobilization in 2005, it was common for door-to-door campaigns to reach half of the people they tried to contact. By 2018, that number had dropped to about 18 percent.

To close the gap, campaigns moved toward asking people to contact people they knew and help turn out those supporters and social networks. Text messages, especially reminder texts, became the virtual door knock.

“These friend-to-friend approaches are seen as a way to cut through the noise,” Bedolla writes.

These personal approaches can also create a sense of accountability.

Knowing that someone is paying attention to your vote, however it is cast, might make a difference in a local, state or federal election.

Howard Manly is the race and equity editor for The Conversation. Matt Williams is the senior breaking news and international editor for The Conversation. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Smiley should have answered editorial board’s questions

With elections coming it’s sometimes hard to find information about the current… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Oct. 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., speaks during a news conference the vote to codify Roe v. Wade, in this May 5, 2022 file photo on Capitol Hill in Washington. Murray is one of the U.S. Senate's most powerful members and seeking a sixth term. She is being challenged by Tiffany Smiley, a Republican from Pasco, Wash. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)
Editorial: Murray’s effective leadership warrants reelection

The five-term U.S. senator is a leader in the chamber yet works for needs of her constituents.

2022 Election campaign buttons with the USA flag - Illustration
Editorial: Retain Sen. Liias, Rep. Peterson in 21st district

The long-serving Democrats’ record of legislative success has earned leadership posts for both.

2022 Election campaign buttons with the USA flag - Illustration
Editorial: Return Duerr, Kloba to 1st District House seats

The two Democrats have been effective in passing legislation that serves residents’ needs.

Cassie Franklin, Mayor of Everett, delivers the annual state of the city address Thursday morning in the Edward D. Hansen Conference Center in Everett, Washington on March 31, 2022.  (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett’s budget crunch points to larger tax issue

The city’s deficit and a need for more revenue calls attention to reforms to the state’s tax structure.

10th LD, Pos. 1: Shavers supports kids’ education

As a life-long educator, dedicating my career to improving and enhancing education… Continue reading

NAS Whidbey Growlers’ noise is sound of freedom and economy

Regarding the “whiners” on Whidbey Island objecting to the noise of NAS… Continue reading

Saunders: Biden using taxpayer money for students’ debts

At least $400 billion is going toward the bailout, helpfully timed to help Democrats in the midterms.

Most Read