Comment: We need a data privacy law; but Senate bill isn’t it

Unless significant changes are made, SB 5062 won’t provide real protections for our information.

By Norma Smith, Jon Pincus and Linda Wehrman / For The Herald

For the third year in a row, legislators are attempting to pass a bill that claims to defend people’s data privacy. But instead of providing Washingtonians the rights needed to protect our personal information, the bill leaves us powerless and uninformed.

It claims to grant us rights (regarding only certain categories of information), then prevents us from accessing justice when those rights are violated. It is a great bill for Big Tech, and a failure for individual freedom and real data privacy.

Our legislators need to hear from us now: Dramatically improve Senate Bill 5062 or kill it.

The authors of this commentary met last year. The Senate had passed the even more deceptive Washington Privacy Act 47-1. One of us was a Republican state legislator on the House committee who’s job it was to try and fix the bad bill. The others were grass-roots activists with Indivisible, a progressive coalition. We disagree about a lot of issues, but this issue brings together ordinary folks across the political spectrum; after all, it’s our data and our rights at the heart of this debate.

Last session, House legislators listened to Washingtonians across the state who told us they wanted us to protect their privacy, civil rights groups who told us how badly people would be harmed, and experts from consumer and privacy groups who told us how to improve the hot mess the Senate had given us. We did a lot of work to make it better. The bill we passed wasn’t perfect, but it fixed a lot of the problems, and it would have given Washingtonians meaningful protection.

But the Senate rejected our improvements. So nothing passed, and the lawlessness continues.

Things have changed a lot since last year. The pandemic means that for many people even more of our life is online. And the harmful consequences are the stuff of daily news stories: emergency room patients being targeted by personal injury lawyers, cell phone customers having their location data shared and used for nefarious purposes, app users having highly personal information about their location, political views, health and ethnicity sold to third parties; you can add your own stories to the list. The weak protections in this bill don’t protect us; or our children, parents, and friends who may be at even more risk than we are.

This year, sponsors of the bill again claim they want to help solve these problems, yet propose a bill draft that has drawn support only from Big Tech and corporate lobbyists. How bad is it? It doesn’t cover student data or employee data. It lets tech companies exploit your data pretty much

however they want without your consent. You can’t sue tech companies, or anybody else, if they break the law and invade your data privacy. It’s filled with loopholes and exceptions that neuter the protections and rights it claims to give — and gives BigTech companies, with their hundreds of lawyers, all kinds of ways to dodge any attempt to enforce it.

Our data privacy is vitally important to each of us. In an online ecosystem, Washingtonians share volumes of details about our lives. And every bit of data required, or posted on social media, or provided by our consumption of news and entertainment, is utilized by potentially thousands of companies to grow their wealth, influence and capability to manipulate; most often without our knowledge or consent. Every day, companies and government entities violate our data privacy without repercussion from any meaningful state or federal laws.

It’s critical to remember that the second substitute for SB 5062 prevents individuals from accessing justice when companies violate their data privacy. Despite repeated objections from the state Office of the Attorney General, the bill relies solely on the AG’s office for enforcement with a wholly inadequate budget.

Because the bill lacks meaningful enforcement, it is widely opposed by consumer advocates and community members — and supported by Big Tech.

Proponents of the Washington Privacy Act claim that their bill would be better than no bill at all. We disagree. Both this year and last year, legislators introduced much stronger competing bills that would empower consumers and provide meaningful enforcement mechanisms. Passing a bad bill that only gives the illusion of privacy is worse than not doing anything.

The people of Washington deserve real data privacy legislation that empowers individuals and respects our constitutional rights.

Norma Smith represented the 10th Legislative District in the House of Representatives from 2008 through 2020, and served as the ranking Republican on the House Innovation, Technology and Economic Development Committee. Jon Pincus is chief technology officer of The Nexus Today, former software architect and executive at Microsoft and other tech companies, and a leader of Indivisible Plus Washington. Linda Wehrman is a retired nurse, a mom, and a co-leader of Indivisible Whidbey.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this Friday, Oct. 4, 2019, file photo, a man using an electronic cigarette exhales in Mayfield Heights, Ohio. On Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2019, the American Medical Association said it is calling for an immediate ban on all electronic cigarette and vaping devices. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak, File)
Editorial: Shut down flavored tobacco’s gateway to youths

Legislation in Olympia would bar the use of flavors and menthol in vape products and cigarettes.

Glad to see right-of-center opinion in Herald

I’ve been a subscriber to the Daily Herald for nearly 20 years.… Continue reading

Which great years are we returning to, President Trump?

A couple of things that I would like to see answered by… Continue reading

Congressional Republicans should stand for beliefs

Dear Republicans, I understand your conundrum. I know you feel you must… Continue reading

Comment: Musk’s shoddy aim at USAID hit U.S. farmers, too

The agency paid farmers $2 billion for crops to feed a hungry world and to support a vital industry.

Gesen: A New York lesson on our choices as collective hostages

Seven U.S. attorneys general stepped down rather than go against their morals. How will we react?

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Herald report of Everett protest inaccurate, biased

I was at the rally and protest in Everett last on Feb.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.