Editorial: Going shopping? Which bag is the greenest tote?

Editorial: Going shopping? Which bag is the greenest tote?

With Everett’s single-use bag ban begun, your choice of tote can make a difference for the environment.

By The Herald Editorial Board

Going shopping? Don’t forget your bags.

Shoppers in Everett are no longer getting single-use plastic bags to haul home their groceries; instead they’ll have the option of using their own reusable bags or pay a five-cent fee for a paper bag or a thicker plastic bag. The bag ban began Monday.

The Everett City Council passed the new ordinance in December, to encourage people to bring their own bags to stores for purchases and reduce the amount of plastic that befouls our waters, billows in trees and lingers in landfills.

Everett joins a list of about 20 other cities and jurisdictions in the state that have passed similar bans on the single-use bags that have been commonplace in grocery and other retail stores for about 30 to 40 years. Edmonds was the first city in the county to pass a similar bag ban, and has been joined by Everett, Mukilteo, Shoreline and Quil-Ceda Village in Tulalip. The state Legislature also considered a statewide ban this year, with the bill passing in the Senate, before it ran up against the session’s deadline in the House.

As handy as the bags are for carrying things — with some then lining kitchen trash bins and picking up after pets — the bags are among the most visibile targets for efforts to reduce plastic pollution. And with good reason.

A 2014 report by Scientific American found that the full range of plastic pollution — because it isn’t biodegradable but breaks down into tiny microplastics that contain and absorb toxic chemicals — are ingested by birds and marine life. A European Commission study cited by the magazine, found that 90 percent of North Sea birds had plastics in their stomachs. Another report blamed the ingestion of plastics for tens of thousands of deaths of birds and marine wildlife worldwide.

The bags aren’t the only source of plastic pollution, however, and even as legislation banning bags have grown more common — about 250 municipalities have adopted bag bans as have the states of California and New York — there remain concerns about the environmental costs of what is used in place of the single-use bags.

A look at those costs should help consumers consider what they’ll use to carry their groceries home.

The paper bags, which were the standard long before plastic bags were commonplace, are biodegradable and don’t pose the same threat to wildlife as plastic bags, but they do have a significant downside: While some recycled paper is used for pulp in making paper, it remains a process that involves heavy use of water and toxic chemicals and produces its share of greenhouse gas emissions in production and shipping.

Even the reuseable tote bags aren’t as green as they might seem, especially cotton canvas bags.

A story from earlier this spring on National Public Radio’s “Planet Money” podcast, found recent studies critical of the cotton totes. (No, the irony wasn’t lost on public radio for coming down on the cotton tote bags so popular as donation swag during fund drives.)

Noting cotton production’s contribution to greenhouse gases and heavy water use, the report pointed to studies that estimated that a cotton tote would have to be used 131 times before it made up for the impact to climate change from a single-use plastic bag. The Washington Policy Center made a similar point in 2016, citing the UK Environment Agency that estimated cotton canvas bags would have to be used 173 times to equal the impact from a single-use bag.

Surprisingly, reusable plastic bags may be the better option, and are typically right there at the checkout stand, next to the candy, lip balm and copies of People magazine.

Polyester bags need to be used 42 times to equal a single-use plastic bag. Woven polypropylene bags need to be used only 11 to 13 times to justify the switch from a single-use plastic bag.

And multiple re-use is the whole idea behind the bags.

Some will question the need for a ban on the plastic bags, especially if the state Legislature again considers a bill next year. A full look at the bag bans in Everett and elsewhere in the state and how they are changing shopping habits and how well they are reducing plastic pollution should follow.

Such a review should keep in mind that any alternative will have its own impacts to consider. But what the bag bans will do — along with reducing a significant amount of plastic waste and pollution — will serve as a daily reminder to consider how we can reduce the amount of plastic and other packaging we too easily rely on.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, May 28

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Double sunset.  Lake Ballinger, 12-30-18

David Carlos captured this image at Lake Ballinger. "Mother Nature performed a show of her own," he says. He used a Sony A7iii camera.
Editorial: A Terrace creek puts infrastructure plan to work

Restoring Hall Creek’s meandering path will treat stormwater while providing a natural park.

Garry Clark is CEO of Economic Alliance Snohomish County. (Kevin Clark / Herald file)
Garry Clark: Black parents can only prepare kids for racism

We couldn’t shield our teen daughter from hateful words. But we prepared her and she relied on her strength.

Dan Hazen
Dan Hazen: We can speak our minds but can we learn to listen?

Our opinions are only half of the discussion. We have learn to accept when we’ve lost an argument.

Providence gift shops are open and looking for volunteers

A huge thank you to Herald writer Andrea Brown and photographer Ryan… Continue reading

Thanks to those who made Rotary fundraiser a success

On behalf of the Rotary Club of South Everett-Mukilteo Rotary, I want… Continue reading

Comment: After decades of school shootings we have no answers

Why? Because federal research into causes and possible solutions hadn’t begun until this September.

Comment: Finding sanctuary in nature offsets world’s horrors

A foreign correspondent returns from war and chaos to a cemetery’s stone bench to remember and breath.

Comment: Americans welcoming Ukrainians; America isn’t

President Biden said the U.S. would accept 100,000 refugees, but immigration rules have prevented even that.

Most Read