Chris Charbonneau, chief executive for Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands, speaks at a news conference addressing a change in rules on the nearly 50-year-old Title X family planning program as Gov. Jay Inslee (left) and state Attorney General Bob Ferguson look on, Thursday in Seattle. (Elaine Thompson / Associated Press)

Chris Charbonneau, chief executive for Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands, speaks at a news conference addressing a change in rules on the nearly 50-year-old Title X family planning program as Gov. Jay Inslee (left) and state Attorney General Bob Ferguson look on, Thursday in Seattle. (Elaine Thompson / Associated Press)

Editorial: State makes right move by funding Title X services

Replacing funding a federal agency has pulled will save money and assure better health for women.

By The Herald Editorial Board

For millions of low-income American women and families, a “gag rule” imposed on the federal Title X program and Planned Parenthood’s resulting decision to — at least temporarily — end its role as a program provider will mean longer wait times, higher costs and tougher access to family planning services that includes contraceptive care and screening for sexually transmitted diseases.

Except in Washington state.

Last week, after Planned Parenthood said it would leave the program rather than comply with a Trump administration rule, state officials — among them Gov. Jay Inslee and Attorney General Bob Ferguson — announced that the state will cover nearly $3 million in the costs of the program here, at least through March. Additional funding could also be included as part of the state’s supplemental budget when the Legislature begins its 2020 session in January.

Title X, enacted by Congress in 1970 to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and break the cycle of poverty among low-income women and families who couldn’t afford contraception, serves an estimated 4 million women in the U.S. Two-thirds of the women served by the program are at or below the federal poverty level. As well as contraceptive care and screening for STIs, Title X providers also screen patients for breast cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure and depression, often delivering the only health care available to low-income women.

Planned Parenthood provided about 40 percent of the $286 million in care provided through Title X and had provided funds for 85 clinic sites in the state, including Planned Parenthood offices in Everett, Lynnwood and Marysville.

The change to Title X, finalized earlier this year by the Trump administration but facing court challenges — including by Washington state — prohibits clinics and staff in the program from providing abortions or referring or discussing abortion as an option with patients. Planned Parenthood and other providers have long complied with a decade-old federal rule that forbids the use of federal funds for abortions, except for a medical emergency or in cases involving rape or incest. Providers must use other funding sources for abortion services.

Rather than discouraging abortions, however, the Trump administration’s Title X rule change presents the likelihood of numerous unintended consequences, including poor health outcomes for women and families, a rise in unplanned pregnancies, a greater incidence of sexually transmitted disease and a loss of ground in the current drop in the nation’s abortion rate.

Denying patients full information on the options available to them — not to mention limiting their access to contraceptives — can only result in more unintended pregnancies and a reversal in the trend of fewer women seeking abortions.

Under Title X’s former rules, the national rate of abortions has dropped steadily and significantly since hitting a high of 29.3 abortions per 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44 in 1982, according to the Guttmacher Institute. As of 2014, that rate has dropped to 14.6 abortions for every 1,000 women, its lowest level since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortions.

The same trend was seen in Washington state. Between 2011 and 2014, the rate declined from 16 to 13.7 abortions per 1,000.

The rule change also is likely to mean increased costs for states and the federal government because of the expected increase in unintended pregnancies and STIs, a point made by Christine Charbonneau, the chief executive for Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands.

“States can’t afford not to pay for family planning programs,” Charbonneau said during last Thursday’s news conference. “They end up with an untenable burden in labor and delivery costs — and Medicaid afterward — if they don’t.”

Washington and eight other states are challenging the rule change in court, although the states lost a decision on a stay of the rule while the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rehears arguments regarding a district court’s temporary injunction.

Ferguson and other state attorneys general have challenged the rule change on the grounds that it violates the Affordable Care Act’s protections against government interference with the doctor-patient relationship; ignores Congress’ mandate that Title X pregnancy counseling be non-directive; violates physicians’ constitutional rights to free speech; and violates women’s constitutional freedoms protected under Roe v. Wade.

Until the Trump administration’s Title X rule is overturned in the courts or by a change at the White House, state officials and lawmakers have done the right thing by stepping in to provide the funding for the program’s patients under the former rules.

They can continue that funding with the knowledge that — despite the outlay — they will save the state money in the long run and will assure better health outcomes for women and families throughout the state as well as continuing the decline in abortions.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, June 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Joe Kennedy, a former assistant football coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Wash., poses for a photo March 9, 2022, at the school's football field. After losing his coaching job for refusing to stop kneeling in prayer with players and spectators on the field immediately after football games, Kennedy will take his arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, April 25, 2022, saying the Bremerton School District violated his First Amendment rights by refusing to let him continue praying at midfield after games. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Court majority weakens church, state separation

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision does more to hurt religious liberty than protect a coach’s prayer.

Supreme Court weakens wall between church, state

The Supreme Court definitely got it wrong with regards to the Bremerton… Continue reading

Snohomish tax break for developers shifts burden

City of Snohomish Planning Director Glen Pickus in his Oct. 2, 2018… Continue reading

Comment: Patriot Front arrests in Idaho a reminder of threat

The West has past experience with right-wing extremists. A van full of white men looking to riot should surprise no one.

Comment: The weight of Jan. 6 chairman’s optimistic melancholy

Rep. Bernie Thompson’s measured demeanor set a factual tone for Tuesday’s unsettling testimony.

A pregnant protester is pictured with a message on her shirt in support of abortion rights during a march, Friday, June 24, 2022, in Seattle. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to end constitutional protections for abortion has cleared the way for states to impose bans and restrictions on abortion — and will set off a series of legal battles. (AP Photo/Stephen Brashear)
Editorial: Court’s decision a subtraction from our rights

Using a cherry-picked history, it limits the rights of women and will extend the reach of poverty.

A Capitol Police Officer rests his hand near his gun as he works by the anti-scaling fencing outside the Supreme Court, Thursday, June 23, 2022, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Editorial: Tough path for gun legislation becomes less clear

U.S. Supreme Court decision on gun laws clouds hopes for reasonable and effective safety measures.

FILES - Cars line up at a Shell gas station June 17, 2022, in Miami. President Joe Biden on June 22 will call on Congress to suspend the federal gasoline and diesel taxes for three months. It's a move meant to ease financial pressures at the pump that also reveals the political toxicity of high gas prices in an election year. (AP Photo/Marta Lavandier, File)
Editorial: Gas tax holiday could end up costing us even more

President Biden’s request to suspend gas taxes offers little benefit and considerable risk.

Most Read