An artist’s rendering of the interior of Propeller Airports’ planned passenger terminal at Paine Field in Everett. (Courtesy of Propeller Airports)

An artist’s rendering of the interior of Propeller Airports’ planned passenger terminal at Paine Field in Everett. (Courtesy of Propeller Airports)

Editorial: Use FAA’s new review of Paine Field terminal wisely

Rather than re-litigate old arguments, continue work to limit the impacts of commercial air service.

By The Herald Editorial Board

Alaska, United and Southwest are not cleared for takeoff at Paine Field.

Not just yet, and maybe not for as long as 18 months.

The Federal Aviation Administration last week announced it was launching a new environmental assessment, a supplement to the assessment it made in 2012 that had assumed the operation of up to 12 flights a day — 12 takeoffs and 12 landings — at the Snohomish County-operated airport in Everett.

Since that review one of the initial airlines that had proposed offering commercial flights dropped out and was replaced by two others. Combined, the three airlines are planning a total of 24 flights each day from the general purpose airport, adding a new option for business and other travelers who now choose between Seattle-Tacoma International Airport — with a traffic-choked I-5 to slog through — and Bellingham International, about an hour north of Everett.

It’s an announcement that will disappoint supporters of commercial flights at Paine Field, who view that service as a needed boost to the county’s economic strength. Propeller Airports, which is building and will operate the terminal is, itself, part of that economic boost. It moved its headquarters from New York to Everett, and secured a 50-year lease for 11 acres of airport property, bringing $429,000 annually to the county in lease payments, plus a share of flight and parking revenue.

At the same time, the FAA’s decision gives a community group and Mukilteo city officials a second opportunity to voice their opposition to the daily commercial flights.

With a doubling of anticipated flights since 2012, it’s a review that should go forward now to avoid potential legal challenges in the future and to give full confidence to Paine Field neighbors and the larger community that possible impacts have been examined and addressed.

As of January, the two-gate terminal now being completed by Propeller maxed itself out with the addition of Southwest Airlines, which is seeking to offer five daily flights using Boeing 737s with 143 to 175 seats. That’s in addition to United Airline’s plans to offer six daily flights on 76-seat Embraer E175 jets and 13 daily flights on Embraer jets from Alaska Air’s partner, Horizon.

Propeller expects to serve about 1,700 departing passengers daily, a significant increase from the 1,000 passengers studied in the 2012 review.

Supplemental reviews by the FAA typically take between six and 18 months, including a 30-day public comment period prior to a final determination by the federal agency. The FAA could find that additional review isn’t necessary or that a new — and even lengthier — environmental review of noise, traffic and other impacts is required.

At its quickest, the review would mean the airlines couldn’t begin operations until the end of the year. The terminal, on which Propeller is spending about $40 million to build, is expected to be complete by September. A longer review will mean a frustrating wait as the terminal sits empty, whether that’s during a long, gray winter when warmer southern destinations are calling or when opportunities to land new businesses and jobs fly overhead to other new homes.

But both supporters and opponents can use that time best to continue their discussions, rather than re-litigate old arguments and force further delays.

When the state Supreme Court declined last year to hear an appeal by Mukilteo officials and Save Our Communities regarding approval for the terminal, Mukilteo Mayor Jennifer Gregerson said the city would focus on working with Propeller and the airlines to mitigate noise and traffic impacts.

Mukilteo and Paine Field neighbors can continue to hold Propeller and the airlines to their earlier commitments to a “fly friendly” program that works to set flight paths, hours of operation and other practices that limit noise and other impacts. The FAA’s review can then serve as an accurate baseline on which to evaluate those planned mitigations.

With ground transportation between Everett and Sea-Tac increasingly choked — and light-rail service between Everett and Sea-Tac not arriving for another 20 years — Snohomish County must be able to provide a link by air to Seattle, the West Coast and other destinations. But the airlines, which will have exclusive access to the passenger market here, need to be good neighbors.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

A young man carries water past the destroyed buildings of a neighborhood in the Gaza Strip, Feb. 2, 2025. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “own” the Gaza Strip and transfer its population elsewhere has stirred condemnation and sarcasm, but it addresses a real and serious challenge: the future of Gaza as a secure, peaceful, even prosperous place. (Saher Alghorra/The New York Times)
Comment: ‘Homeland’ means exactly that to Gazans

Palestinians have long resisted resettlement. Trump’s plan to ‘clean out’ Gaza changes nothing.

Rent stabilization can keep more from losing homes

Thank you to The Herald Editorial Board for its editorial, regarding rent… Continue reading

Don’t pamper young criminals with lenient sentences

I want to give a shout out to Todd Welch for his… Continue reading

Comment: Democracy depends on support of local journalism

A state bill provides funding to support local news outlets through a modest tax on tech businesses.

Comment: Love is intoxicating; romance doesn’t have to be

Navigating sobriety while dating, with Valentine’s Day coming up, is possible and fulfilling.

Comment: State attempt at single-payer health care bound to fail

Other states have tried, but balked when confronted with the immense cost to state taxpayers.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

Forum: Requiem for a lost heavyweight: Sports Illustrated

SI, with Time and NatGeo, were a holy trinity for me and my dad. Now, it’s a world of AI clickbait.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.