GOP cedes the high ground on homeland security

The perennially tardy President Obama appeared a half- hour early for Monday’s speech outlining his 2016 budget — a rare show of enthusiasm for the sacrificial ritual of sending his annual spending proposal to die on Capitol Hill.

But Obama had reason to be energetic, because this budget rollout was less about the 2016 blueprint than the current showdown with congressional Republicans, who are threatening to cut off funding for the Department of Homeland Security at month’s end if Obama doesn’t abandon his immigration policies.

The White House, emphasizing the point, staged the speech at a DHS campus in Northwest Washington, D.C., an old naval facility that occupies one of the highest perches in the city. From here, facing rows of men and women in the uniforms of the Coast Guard, Border Patrol, FEMA and other DHS agencies, Obama unquestionably occupied the high ground as well in his looming fight with Congress.

“The work you do hangs in the balance,” Obama said to those assembled, warning Republicans not to “jeopardize our national security over this disagreement” and mocking a claim by a Republican lawmaker that cutting off the department’s funding is “not the end of the world.”

“It is the end of a paycheck for tens of thousands of front-line workers who’ll continue to have to work without getting paid,” he said. “Over 40,000 Border Patrol and customs agents, over 50,000 airport screeners, over 13,000 immigration officers, over 40,000 men and women in the Coast Guard.”

This is why Republicans will probably come to regret the showdown they forced with Obama by allowing DHS funding to expire at the end of this month while the rest of the government operates through September. Their argument — that they are happy to fund homeland security as long as it doesn’t include funds to implement Obama’s executive actions on immigration — is unlikely to prevail in public opinion against Obama’s claims that Republicans “jeopardize our national security.” This has echoes of 2002, when President George W. Bush clobbered Democrats by alleging that they were “not interested in the security of the American people,” because of a dispute over union provisions in the creation of DHS.

Their uphill fight over DHS funding also distracts from Republicans’ budget arguments, where they are in a stronger position. Obama’s 2016 proposal is a combination of the timid (he again does little to address the long-term problem with entitlements) and the symbolic (his proposed tax increases have little chance in the Republican Congress).

In his speech Monday, Obama continued to make dubious claims to justify the new spending he proposes.

“Since I took office, we have cut our deficits by about two-thirds,” he said — but this is true only if you don’t count the enormous deficit amassed in fiscal 2009 as part of Obama’s presidency.

“The budget I’ve sent to Congress today is fully paid for,” he alleged — even though his budget has a $474 billion projected deficit in 2016 and would add about $5.7 trillion to the debt over a decade.

“I will not accept a budget that severs the vital link between our national security and our economic security,” he said — but a congressional budget resolution does not require a president’s signature.

Those inconsistencies might get more of an airing if Obama weren’t about to go eyeball-to-eyeball with congressional Republicans over homeland security. When it comes to fighting terrorists, the president brings better imagery than Congress can. The arsenal was on display Monday at DHS: the sharpshooters on roofs, helicopters overhead, multiple layers of vehicle barriers, explosive-sniffing dogs, magnetometers, X-ray machines and physical inspections, the sound system playing the Air Force Band’s rendition of “The Stars and Stripes Forever” — and rows of men and women in uniform, many taking photos of the commander in chief.

The 200 civil servants in an old gymnasium served as props for Obama as he made his dispute with Congress about them.

“You safeguard our ports, you patrol our borders, you inspect our chemical plants, screen travelers for Ebola, shield our computer networks, help hunt down criminals from around the world,” Obama told his props. And he all but dared Republicans to stop paying them. “Every day, we count on people like you to keep America secure. … The least we can do is have your backs.”

After his early arrival, Obama took just 14 minutes to deliver his message. Defending his budget would have been hard work — but winning this homeland-security fight with Congress is child’s play.

Dana Milbank is a Washington Post columnist.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, March 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The WA Cares law is designed to give individuals access to a lifetime benefit amount that, should they need it, they can use on a wide range of long-term services and supports. (Washington State Department of Social and Health Services)
Editorial: Changes to WA Cares will honor voters’ confidence

State lawmakers are considering changes to improve the benefit’s access and long-term stability.

Burke: If Canada won’t join U.S., our state could look north

There are more pluses than minuses to becoming the 11th province, including an easy-to-sing anthem.

Comment: Governor should reconsider pulling fisheries expert

Gov. Ferguson, without explanation, canceled the reappointment of a Fish & Wildlife panel member.

Comment: U.S. allies get the message in Signal debacle

It’s clear what U.S. officials think of ouor allies, but so to is the administration’s ineptitude.

Comment: ‘Adolescence’ should wake us to plight of boys

The Netflix series delves into how boys and young men have fallen for toxic role models on social media.

Comment: Trump-onomics made sense to voters; less so now

The president’s trade war and other economic policies are wars of choice. He will own their effects.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Keep journalism vital with state grant program

Legislation proposes a modest tax for some tech companies to help pay salaries of local journalists.

A semiautomatic handgun with a safety cable lock that prevents loading ammunition. (Dan Bates / The Herald)
Editorial: Adopt permit-to-purchase gun law to cut deaths

Requiring training and a permit to buy a firearm could reduce deaths, particularly suicides.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: One option for pausing pay raise for state electeds

Only a referendum could hold off pay increases for state lawmakers and others facing a budget crisis.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, March 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.