As the BP oil spill destroys nature’s delicate balance in and along the Gulf of Mexico, it may also upset an uneasy political balance in Congress — one that supports badly needed legislation to move the nation toward a cleaner, sustainable energy future.
Backers of a comprehensive climate and energy bill have focused their gaze on Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who helped write the bill introduced this month by Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.). Graham backed away from the bill to protest procedural moves by Majority Leader Harry Reid, and many had hoped a reversal on Reid’s part would bring Graham back into the fold. Now, though, Graham is balking because, he says, the BP spill will make it harder to expand offshore oil drilling — a key part of the bipartisan compromise Graham helped negotiate.
Understandably, Graham says he won’t back a bill that doesn’t have the votes to pass. He worries that because anti-drilling sentiment has hardened among Democrats, it will take more Republican votes to approve a compromise than he can deliver.
We would remind Graham’s GOP colleagues of a few key points:
That’s really the key question — whether our nation will be a leader in the clean-energy revolution that’s coming, or allow others to seize the economic benefits because we couldn’t break out of an outdated, dirty-energy mold.
As the true depth of the disaster in the Gulf emerges in the coming weeks, so should the answer.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
