Community Transit might soon start offering a low-income bus fare to qualified riders. (Lizz Giordano / The Herald)

State Supreme Court hears Everett case of bus fare checks

His lawyer contends fare checks amount to unconstitutional seizure. Justices will decide at a later date.

OLYMPIA — After attorneys gave their formal arguments Thursday morning in the state Supreme Court, justices could decide the fate of fare enforcement on public buses and trains.

At question: Is the act of inspecting a transit rider’s fare an invasion of a person’s right to privacy?

In this case, that person is Zachery Meredith, 37, who boarded a Community Transit Swift bus headed to Everett almost four years ago. When asked, he acted as if he had fare, but couldn’t find proof. He was arrested and eventually convicted by a jury for giving a Snohomish County sheriff’s deputy a fake name.

He reportedly said he was “Jason McGumery,” from Colorado, but deputies learned his real identity after fingerprinting him. One deputy advised him on the correct spelling of Montgomery, according to court documents.

Meredith has fought the gross misdemeanor through Everett District Court, Snohomish County Superior Court, the state Court of Appeals and finally the state Supreme Court.

Fare at the time cost $2.25.

Justices will submit their opinion at a later date. What they asked Thursday may hint at their approach. They may consider a number of questions.

The most important: Was Meredith seized?

Attorney Tobin Klusty said he was, the moment an armed, uniformed sheriff’s deputy asked him for proof of payment.

“In that moment, no reasonable person would feel that they could decline that command or refuse to answer,” Klusty said.

Such a seizure would be unconstitutional, Klusty said, because the deputy had not developed probable cause or a reasonable suspicion to stop him.

If justices side with Klusty, it could have far-reaching impacts on the way fare enforcement is conducted on public transit. It would be impossible to tell whether a passenger has paid fare by just looking at them. Even meeting the low bar of a reasonable suspicion would be unfeasible.

Agencies would have to rethink “barrier-free transit,” like the Swift line or King County Metro’s RapidRide buses, where riders can pay at the station instead of on the bus. Technically, no one will stop people from getting on if they don’t pay, so transit authorities rely on fare enforcement to ensure payments.

The barrier-free method is faster, less costly and more efficient, transit authorities say.

Representing the state, Snohomish County deputy prosecutor Nathaniel Sugg contended the act of asking for fare doesn’t constitute a seizure. If it was a seizure, he said, riders consent to it when they step on a public bus or train. He argued any reasonable person who boards should expect someone might ask for proof of payment. It’s a “minimal intrusion” that should qualify as a rare exception for the need of suspicion or probable cause, he said.

Who is a “reasonable person?” asked Justice Sheryl McCloud. She said there might be a difference in expectation depending on the person.

“When I’m asked for proof of fare, maybe I don’t necessarily feel seized,” McCloud said. “When a person of color is confronted by law enforcement and is asked for proof of anything, in an enclosed space, of a bus or train, maybe they do feel seized.”

Sugg suggested the court’s analysis “should properly include all people of color and of all experiences.”

A rider survey done by Sound Transit found Black passengers were disproportionately targeted by fare enforcement. Another study by King County Metro looked at the prevalent economic disparities of fare enforcement.

Justice Mary Yu asked Sugg whether there’s a difference between being asked for proof of payment by an unarmed transit employee or an armed law enforcement officer.

“There could be a difference in intimidating presence between law enforcement officers and non-law enforcement officer fare enforcers,” Sugg said.

In this case, Klusty said, because it was clear the sheriff’s deputy was law enforcement, the court didn’t have to consider whether an unarmed transit employee’s fare check amounted to a seizure.

That means justices could effectively decide fare checks can still happen, just not by law enforcement officers.

Potentially, justices also could scratch out the statute granting transit authorities the power to carry out fare checks, in the same way they did away with the crime of simple drug possession in the Blake decision last year.

Klusty said justices didn’t necessarily have to go that far. The statute could stay intact, he said, but the role of law enforcement should be limited.

Zachariah Bryan: 425-339-3431; zbryan@heraldnet.com. Twitter: @zachariahtb.

Talk to us

More in Local News

FILE - In this photo taken Oct. 2, 2018, semi-automatic rifles fill a wall at a gun shop in Lynnwood, Wash. Gov. Jay Inslee is joining state Attorney General Bob Ferguson to propose limits to magazine capacity and a ban on the sale of assault weapons. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson, File)
Democrats advance assault weapons ban, new rules for gun buyers

The measures passed a House committee without Republican support. They are part of a broader agenda to curb gun violence.

A person and child watch seagulls on the Mukilteo-Clinton ferry in Washington on Thursday, Jan. 12, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Cold weather returning to Western Washington

Nightly temperatures in the 20s with highs in the 30s were expected this weekend. Cold weather shelters will be open.

Marysville Mayor Jon Nehring is this year's winner of the Henry M. Jackson Award given by Economic Alliance Snohomish County. Photographed in Marysville, Washington on April 25, 2022. (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Marysville State of the City address set for Feb. 1

Mayor Jon Nehring will highlight 2022 accomplishments and look to the future. Questions from the audience will follow.

NO CAPTION NECESSARY: Logo for the Cornfield Report by Jerry Cornfield. 20200112
A move to require voting and a bicameral chasm on vehicle pursuits

It’s Day 19 and the mood is heating up as the third week of the 2023 legislative session comes to an end.

Lynnwood County Council candidate Joshua Binda is the subject of two complaints with the Public Disclosure Commission. (Josh Binda campaign photo)
Binda fined $1,000 for misuse of campaign contributions

The Lynnwood Council member’s personal use of donor funds was a “serious violation” of campaign law, the state PDC concluded.

Juniper DeCasso, 17, prepares groceries for pickup at the Edmonds Food Bank in Edmonds, Washington on Monday, Jan. 16, 2023. Scriber Lake High School student Juniper works at the Edmonds Food bank as part of an on-the-job training class that teaches students about career options and goal planning, while also paying them for a part-time internship. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
School program gives Scriber Lake teens class credits — and paychecks

The on-the-job training program offers paid internships and career planning assignments with a real-world feel.

Dr. Robert Carsrud from the 2015 King County Voters Pamphlet. (King County Elections)
State to pay $600K over psychologist’s harassment at Monroe prison

In a federal lawsuit, Tressa Grummer alleged persistent sexual harassment as an intern by her supervisor, Robert Carsrud.

Construction crews work on the Lynnwood Light rail station on Tuesday, March 29, 2022 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Sound Transit asserts Bellevue-Redmond line won’t delay Lynnwood light rail

Its board approved $6 million to study an East Link “starter line.” Lynnwood Mayor Christine Frizzell said: “Snohomish County wants to ride, too.”

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Justices weigh legality of tax aimed at rebalancing state’s tax code

The state Supreme Court heard arguments about whether to overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s.

Most Read