Comment: Blaming ‘Woke’ banks for SVB failure hides GOP’s divide

Traditional Republicans and populists are split on the cause, as they are on issues.

By Jonathan Bernstein / Bloomberg Opinion

Politicians generally don’t like looking silly. And yet a whole bunch of Republican politicians reacted to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank by raging about “woke” banking in ways that made them appear ridiculous to anyone actually concerned about the danger to the banking system and the economy.

No doubt Republicans such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer know that blaming SVB’s downfall on identity politics will play well in conservative media, a crucial audience. (We also shouldn’t discount the possibility that some Republican politicians believe the nonsense they’re saying, given the lack of policy expertise within the party.) But talking about corporations’ imagined woke fixations also helps to paper over the real conflict within the party that the banking scare threatens to reignite.

Republicans are increasingly split between traditional conservatives who back deregulation of banks and other industries and populists who blame their frustrations on institutions of all kinds. Populist rhetoric, extolling ordinary folks and bashing corporate America, has been popular with a segment of the party for a while now. At the same time — and often from the very same politicians — an anti-regulation mantra continues to be the party’s standard answer to many questions about how to best run the economy.

The conflict reflects divergent underlying interests among different groups within the Republican coalition; on the one hand the small and large business interests that have lined up behind Republicans for more than a century, and on the other the white working-class voters who have shifted to the GOP, first in the South and then elsewhere, over the last several decades. Finding policies, or even slogans, that fit both groups isn’t easy, and the more policy concerns center on economics, the harder it becomes to reconcile the conflict.

All this precedes Donald Trump as the Republicans’ leader. Recall that House Republicans revolted against a Republican administration at the peak of the financial crisis in 2008, forcing President George W. Bush to scramble for votes from Democrats to pass a key measure to stabilize the economy. Traditional Republicans had no problem bailing out big corporations, and in fact tended to believe that supporting business was actually the best policy for all Americans. But most voters didn’t buy that; and a lot of Republicans in 2008 sided with those voters.

Trump, in typical fashion, simply took both sides. He amped up populist corporate-bashing rhetoric, but he also talked up deregulating business at least as much as free-market booster Ronald Reagan had decades earlier. And it wasn’t just talk; a weakening of Dodd-Frank banking regulations was one of the few real legislative accomplishments when Trump presided over two years of unified Republican government in 2017 and 2018.

Directing attention away from the fissure within the party and toward the culture war is apt to be successful as long as there is a Democratic president who does the real work of preventing a full-fledged banking crisis.

But Republicans aren’t going to be able to ignore the conflict forever. The split goes far beyond the merits of deregulation. The GOP is divided over immigration, aid to Ukraine and myriad other issues. Republicans seeking the party’s nomination for president will face pressure to reveal where they stand. And should a Republican win the White House, she or he will discover that populist grandstanding is of little use once the fire is at their heels.

Jonathan Bernstein is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering politics and policy. He is a former professor of political science at the University of Texas at San Antonio and DePauw University.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, March 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Construction workers walk along the underside of the Lynnwood Link light rail tracks on Tuesday, March 29, 2022 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: What’s needed to get Link light rail on track

Sound Transit needs to streamline its process, while local governments ready for rail and stations.

Comment: Lawmakers risk second lawsuit over special education

Legislative funding proposals for special education fall far short of what school districts are due.

Comment: Hydro remains key to our next ‘Great Electrification’

Moving to a carbon-free electrical grid will rely on all sources of clean energy, especially hydropower.

Comment: Legislation could threaten access to telehealth

A bill to protect consumers’ health data could inadvertently undermine teleheath services.

Forum: Don’t allow hate to go unchallenged in our communities

Arlington and Snohomish County can’t stay silent in the face of hate crime attacks of family and friends.

Dan Hazen
Forum: When our thoughts don’t square with beliefs, we justify

We seem easily able to dismiss nagging thoughts when our actions don’t match our stated viewpoints.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, March 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Cathlamet, the Washington State Ferry that crashed in Seattle last month, sits at the Port of Everett on Thursday, Aug. 25, 2022, in Everett, Washington. The ferry will require extensive repairs after a hard landing crumpled one corner of the boat at the Fauntleroy dock on July 28. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State needs quicker route for its new ferries

‘Build in Washington’ can be scraped as a mandate, while still counting benefits of in-state shipyards.

Most Read