Comment: Election losers often doubt results; 2020 was worse

Comparing the ‘16 and ‘20 elections, historic numbers of Trump voters refused to accept the outcome.

By Robert Griffin and Mayesha Quasem / Special to The Washington Post

According to data from the Monmouth University Polling Institute, 63 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning independents continue to believe that President Biden won the office through voter fraud. That remarkable figure helps to explain why Republicans in at least 14 states have passed laws making it harder to vote, and why Senate Republicans this week blocked the For the People Act, which would have offset some of those state-level efforts.

A new report from our organization, the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group, helps to clarify just how unusual the 2020 election was, in terms of sowing distrust among voters about the American election system; especially on the right.

In the weeks before the election, there was very little difference in the confidence of Democrats and Republicans that their votes would be miscounted. In late October, according to our weekly survey of some 6,000 voters (a nationally representative sample), 62 percent of supporters of President Trump and 63 percent of Biden supporters said they were somewhat or very confident that the election would be conducted fairly. But by the week after the election, a chasm had opened; with 93 percent of Biden supporters saying they were confident of fairness, compared with just 29 percent of Trump supporters. A similar post-election shift occurred around these voters’ perceptions of the accuracy of vote counts and the prevalence of voter fraud.

Trump’s behavior obviously contributed to this situation. He not only failed to concede that he lost but also led a conspiracy-filled campaign to discredit the results of the election.

To be sure, confidence in the results of elections is typically polarized, with partisans of the losing candidates spotting unfairness. In a separate survey, however, conducted in partnership with YouGov, we found that polarization on the question of fairness of elections was markedly more intense in 2020 than in 2016. In that survey, which included interviews with some 4,900 people from Nov. 13 to Dec. 7, 2020, (again, a nationally representative sample), we found that fully 35 percent of Trump voters said that they were “not at all confident” that their votes had been counted accurately. Many of the same panelists in that survey had taken part in a similar poll after the 2016 election; after that election, only 8 percent of Hillary Clinton voters said they were not at all confident about the vote-counting; more than a fourfold difference.

Polling from Gallup lends weight to the argument that rejection of the election’s winner was far higher this time around. In 2016, more than 8 in 10 Americans said they would accept the elected candidate as legitimate. That includes 76 percent of Clinton voters who said they would accept Trump as their president.

Because of methodological differences, we cannot directly compare results from different polls. But our study found, in contrast, a profound rejection of Biden among Republicans. According to our YouGov-affiliated survey, in the weeks after the election, only 70 percent of all respondents said they accepted Biden as their president. That figure was driven down by Trump supporters, of whom only 34 percent said they accepted Biden’s legitimacy.

Worse, high levels of distrust among Republicans also trickled over into the endorsement of dubious actions. In that same YouGov survey fielded in November 2020, we found that 86 percent of Republicans thought it appropriate for Trump to file lawsuits challenging the election’s results, and 54 percent said it would be appropriate if Trump never conceded the election. An astonishing 46 percent of Republican respondents said it would be appropriate for Republican state legislators to assign electoral votes to Trump in states won by Biden; a radical violation of American electoral norms.

All of this data was collected before the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. In retrospect, the data speaks to the prevalence of the attitudes that motivated the events of that day. Some people thought the Capitol insurrection might be a wake-up call, leading conservative elites to tamp down conspiratorial thinking in the GOP ranks. But so far very little of that has happened; and it has had scant effect on rank-and-file attitudes.

Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our democracy; and trust in those systems and results is critical. While heated elections inevitably produce skepticism and distrust among the supporters of losing candidates, the acceptance of that loss is usually aided by the conciliatory words and actions of losing parties.

The problems sowed by Trump and significant portions of the Republican Party are still with us. Based on the data in this new report, there is every reason to believe we will be dealing with the fallout for the foreseeable future.

Robert Griffin is a political scientist and research director of the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group. Mayesha Quasem is a research assistant for the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

June 11, 2025: Tear Gaslighting
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, June 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

In a gathering similar to many others across the nation on Presidents Day, hundreds lined Broadway with their signs and chants to protest the Trump administration Monday evening in Everett. (Aaron Kennedy / Daily Herald)
Editorial: Let’s remember the ‘peaceably’ part of First Amendment

Most of us understand the responsibilities of free speech; here’s how we remind President Trump.

Will public get a vote on downtown Everett stadium?

I see The Herald is enthusiastic about the push to build a… Continue reading

How are Trump’s actions the ‘will of the people’?

Calling up the National Guard is usually done in concert with a… Continue reading

Call constitutional convention for balanced budget amendment

Congress has not managed the federal purse well. We have been running… Continue reading

Comment: So much for RFK Jr.’s pledge of ‘choice’ on vaccines

His latest action confirms his intention to delist specific vaccines, making them less affordable.

THis is an editorial cartoon by Michael de Adder . Michael de Adder was born in Moncton, New Brunswick. He studied art at Mount Allison University where he received a Bachelor of Fine Arts in drawing and painting. He began his career working for The Coast, a Halifax-based alternative weekly, drawing a popular comic strip called Walterworld which lampooned the then-current mayor of Halifax, Walter Fitzgerald. This led to freelance jobs at The Chronicle-Herald and The Hill Times in Ottawa, Ontario.

 

After freelancing for a few years, de Adder landed his first full time cartooning job at the Halifax Daily News. After the Daily News folded in 2008, he became the full-time freelance cartoonist at New Brunswick Publishing. He was let go for political views expressed through his work including a cartoon depicting U.S. President Donald Trump’s border policies. He now freelances for the Halifax Chronicle Herald, the Toronto Star, Ottawa Hill Times and Counterpoint in the USA. He has over a million readers per day and is considered the most read cartoonist in Canada.

 

Michael de Adder has won numerous awards for his work, including seven Atlantic Journalism Awards plus a Gold Innovation Award for news animation in 2008. He won the Association of Editorial Cartoonists' 2002 Golden Spike Award for best editorial cartoon spiked by an editor and the Association of Canadian Cartoonists 2014 Townsend Award. The National Cartoonists Society for the Reuben Award has shortlisted him in the Editorial Cartooning category. He is a past president of the Association of Canadian Editorial Cartoonists and spent 10 years on the board of the Cartoonists Rights Network.
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, June 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer testifies during a budget hearing before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ending Job Corps a short-sighted move by White House

If it’s jobs the Trump administration hopes to bring back to the U.S., it will need workers to fill them.

Marcus Tageant (Courtesy of City of Lake Stevens)
Welch: Marcus Tageant embodied the spirit of Lake Stevens

I served with Marcus on the city council, witnessing an infectious devotion to his community.

Comment: Anti-‘woke’ crusades by Hegseth, Rubio petty, dangerous

Focused on renaming ships and scrubbing websites, the department heads risk their distraction.

Comment: Why Trump’s Guard deployment is threat to democracy

Trump claims rebellion and invasion; there is neither. Policing protests must be left to states.

Comment: Hegseth renaming ships dishonors memory of ‘warriors’

Navy vessels were named for Harvey Milk, Cesar Chavez and others in recognition of their service to country.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.