Comment: Restoring judicial discretion is in victims’ interest

Mandatory sentences don’t restore justice and often deny victims their voice and support they deserve.

By Annie Nichol / For The Herald

In 1993, my family experienced a horrific crime that changed our lives forever. What we didn’t know at the time was that our trauma would be used to dramatically alter the landscape of the criminal justice system in the U.S. for the next three decades.

I was 6 years old when my sister, Polly Klaas, was kidnapped from our bedroom in Petaluma, Calif., and murdered. In the aftermath of Polly’s death, our tragedy became a rallying cry for punitive sentencing laws that have rapidly expanded prison populations and contributed to the crisis of mass incarceration.

Lawmakers and law enforcement told us these harsh sentencing laws were meant to be a tribute to Polly. But far from honoring my sister’s memory, these laws exploited our grief and used our pain to needlessly punish people, many of whom are still serving decades in prison for low level offenses despite clear evidence of rehabilitation. These sentencing laws prioritized punishment over prevention and created harm in communities far removed from our own. For years, I struggled with the shame of knowing that Polly’s name was used to justify policies that failed to bring the justice or healing survivors deserve. As a resident of Washington, this is why I am voicing my support for the Judicial Discretion Act, House Bill 1125, which is a pivotal step toward putting survivors’ needs and real accountability at the center of resentencing.

Mandatory sentences assume that locking someone away for as long as possible ensures safety, a belief that gained traction in the wake of tragedies like my family’s. But the reality is far more complicated. These policies strip judges of the ability to consider context, including age, trauma or evidence of rehabilitation. A young person who commits a crime under immense personal distress is sentenced with the same rigidity as someone with a lifetime of harmful intent. Such blanket approaches erase opportunities for accountability and growth, the very things that could prevent future harm.

Although lawmakers have framed harsh sentencing as a way to support victims, the voices and needs of most survivors have been broadly excluded from the policies enacted in their name. Studies consistently show that crime survivors overwhelmingly support strategies that focus on prevention and rehabilitation, recognizing these as more effective pathways to safety than extended prison sentences. We want a justice system that keeps people safe, not one that perpetuates cycles of harm. Yet mandatory sentencing disproportionately targets communities of color and low-income families, destabilizing vulnerable neighborhoods while ignoring the root causes of violence.

This is why I hope you will join me in supporting the Judicial Discretion Act, a transformative piece of legislation in Washington state. The act doesn’t eliminate accountability; it enhances it. By allowing judges to revisit sentences after significant time has passed, the JDA acknowledges that people can change and that justice must remain responsive to those changes. It prioritizes fairness and rehabilitation while keeping survivors like me at the center of the process.

The Judicial Discretion Act does more than just offer a second look at sentences. It provides critical resources for survivors, such as relocation assistance, therapy funding, and safety planning. It restores victim advocates in every county to help survivors navigate the resentencing process and ensure their voices are heard. These provisions recognize that justice isn’t only about addressing those who cause harm;

it’s about supporting those who have endured it.

The act also includes safeguards to balance fairness with safety. Judges cannot modify sentences for the most severe crimes, like aggravated murder. Survivors are notified of all hearings and given the opportunity to provide input, ensuring our experiences are central to the process. This thoughtful approach protects public safety while offering a path to healing for everyone involved.

Truth in sentencing laws have long promised finality and closure, but they’ve delivered neither. Instead, they’ve locked survivors and communities into cycles of trauma. The Judicial Discretion Act offers something better: a realistic, compassionate framework that acknowledges the complexities of justice. By focusing on rehabilitation, addressing survivors’ needs, and restoring dignity to the process, this legislation reflects what I’ve come to believe as a survivor: justice must be about more than punishment.

I urge Washington’s lawmakers to pass the Judicial Discretion Act. Survivors deserve a system that listens to us, supports us, and prioritizes safety in ways that punitive policies never have. Justice is not about locking harm away and throwing away the key. It’s about breaking the cycle of harm so that no one else has to suffer the same kind of loss that we have endured.

Annie Nichol is a writer and survivor advocate living in Washington state. She works with Crime Survivors for Safety and Justice to support policies that prioritize healing and accountability.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

Schwab: If you’re OK with foreign aid cuts, guess who’s next

At some point, if they haven’t already, Trump’s and Musk’s cuts will hit all but a very elite few.

Poor planning behind Snohomish PUD rate increase

It did not take long in 2025 for the Snohomish Public Utility… Continue reading

Trump’s aid cut will cost U.S. influence

The last time the U.S. pulled back its aid to other countries,… Continue reading

Musk’s financial access is a threat to personal data, payments

Recently Elon Musk along with six young men between 19-24 were able… Continue reading

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

Comment: Birthright citizenship has helped make America great

Trump’s attempt to end it, almost certainly unconstitutional, won’t fix the nation’s problems at its borders.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

State single-payer health care bill offers many advantages

I was excited to read in Will Geschke’s report (“Everett lawmakers back… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.