Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., a key holdout vote on President Joe Biden’s domestic agenda, speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Oct. 27. (Andrew Harnik / Associated Press)

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., a key holdout vote on President Joe Biden’s domestic agenda, speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Oct. 27. (Andrew Harnik / Associated Press)

Commentary: How both Joes can rebuild Build Back Better

Democrats can sign on to what Manchin wants and offer to keep talking on the Child Tax Credit.

By Adam Jentleson / Special To The Washington Post

Clearly, mistakes were made with the Build Back Better bill.

Who was at fault? Tough to say. On one hand, President Biden, who had a limited supply of policy sweeteners to offer Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., gave them all away up front. On the other hand, Manchin appears to have overreacted to a perceived slight and put federal policy and the fates of millions at risk because his ego got bruised.

In any relationship, fights can be productive, or they can spiral out of control. It’s too early to tell which direction this one will take. One development that could help Democrats move in a positive direction is that Manchin finally put his demands on paper. However, a new obstacle is that those demands exclude making the expanded child tax credit permanent. That’s the economic centerpiece of Biden’s Build Back Better plan, which has slashed child poverty and hunger but is due to expire at the end of this year; pushing 10 million children into poverty.

A productive path forward will involve making some tough choices, restoring a modicum of trust, and engaging in the hard work of persuasion. But the outcome could be a big win for Biden; and Manchin. Substantively, it might also be our best shot at saving the planet, moving America toward its peers in child care and education and keeping children from going hungry.

Here’s the path that the White House and Manchin might follow.

Start with Manchin’s offer: First, Democrats have a huge opening in Manchin’s $1.8 trillion proposal, which was reported by The Washington Post. The bill Manchin would approve includes nearly $2 trillion worth of sound policy, including universal prekindergarten programs. Securing major federal action on climate always depended on the vote of Manchin, a coal state senator, and Manchin’s offer reportedly includes funding levels close to what Biden was seeking, among other things. Democrats could put it on the floor, with the addition of a short-term (say, six-month) extension of the child tax credit. This would mean giving Manchin everything he told Biden he wants.

Manchin’s bottom line only looks bad through the lens of what it leaves out. On that front, Democrats could make an eminently reasonable ask: In return for giving Manchin everything he wants, and putting aside trillions’ worth of their demands, all they will be asking for is a short-term extension of the child tax credit, which Manchin has voted for previously and which will prevent millions of children from sliding into poverty this holiday season. Some quick back-of-the-envelope calculations off the $1.4 trillion cost of a full 10-year extension suggest that a six-month extension would cost just $70 billion. That means that cost-wise, in a $1.8 trillion bill, a short-term extension of the child tax credit is a rounding error.

A short-term extension gives Manchin something else he claims to want: the chance to negotiate a bipartisan solution to extend the credit on a long-term basis. Again, all the White House would be asking for is to keep 10 million kids out of poverty while those negotiations occur. What could be more reasonable?

Set a new deadline to meet: Of course, it would be irresponsible for Democrats to simply hope and pray that these negotiations succeed. Therefore, while Manchin is pursuing bipartisan negotiations, Democrats could introduce a new Families Bill, with a long-term extension of the child tax credit as the centerpiece. This bill can move through the budget reconciliation process, since we already know the tax credit can comply with reconciliation’s strict rules, and the Senate parliamentarian has ruled that additional reconciliation vehicles are available for Democrats to use next year.

This approach would also set up something that typically forces Congress to act: a deadline. It is a sad commentary on our dysfunctional system that Congress needs cliffs to avoid crashing over, but as someone who lived through several crises in my own time working in the Senate, it is true. If the child tax credit is extended for six months, that will create a “CTC cliff” next summer, providing a backstop that will prevent negotiations from dragging on interminably, forcing action and driving media attention.

Meanwhile, the Families Bill would be a boon for Democrats. Build Back Better is an agenda, not necessarily a bill. A major messaging challenge on the legislation itself has been its amorphous, sprawling nature. For example, the reason there is not more attention on the expiration of the child tax credit at the end of this year is that the news is too crowded with the many other issues in the current version of Biden’s legislation.

By contrast, a Families Bill might be much easier to sell to the public, especially in an election year. Having already banked other key elements of Build Back Better, Democrats could make the highly popular child tax credit the centerpiece of their 2022 campaign messaging and highlight Republicans’ refusal to join them in saving kids from poverty. Biden can make the child tax credit a major focus of his State of the Union and use the bully pulpit to demand that Congress refuse to go on summer recess unless it avoids going over the cliff.

What will Manchin do? The big question remains: How will Manchin vote? Predictions are a fool’s game at this point. But the solution is likely a combination of old-fashioned engagement, elbow grease and persuasion. Opposing Biden’s amorphous, multitrillion-dollar spending plan was always an automatic winner for Manchin in West Virginia, a state Trump won by 39 points. But the child tax credit, as a stand-alone, is different. Whatever Manchin’s plans are, killing a tax credit that even Trump supported and sending millions of kids into poverty as a result is a bad look.

Another benefit to Democrats is that Manchin has consistently supported policies to make big corporations and the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share in taxes; opposition from Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., not Manchin, struck such policies from the Build Back Better legislation. To pay for the Families Bill, or Manchin’s bill (or both), Democrats can bring these pay-fors back into play; and prevent themselves from getting outflanked on economic populism by Republicans. Sinema may remain a problem, but she has never been forced to publicly own her opposition to these very popular policies, which even Manchin supports.

Taken together, this approach is not just a way to make the best of a tough situation, but a path to rounding out two years that will, if something like Manchin’s proposal passes, have been very successful legislatively for Biden. Manchin’s bill plus a stand-alone child tax credit extension would come to close to $3 trillion, which is much more than is on the table at the moment. In the child tax credit, Democrats will be giving themselves a focused, popular, bread-and-butter issue to run on in 2022, and forcing Republicans to explain why they oppose a tax credit for families.

The options may look bleak right now. But by taking this approach, Democrats could make the fracas of the past week a distant memory.

Adam Jentleson is the former deputy chief of staff to former Senate majority leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., the author of “Kill Switch: The Rise of the Modern Senate and the Crippling of American Democracy,” and executive director of Battle Born Collective, a progressive strategy nonprofit.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Fire destroyed much of the town of Malden, Washington in 2020 after a tree reportedly snapped and fell into power lines operated by Avista. (AP Photo/Jed Conklin, file)
Editorial: Return of wildfire season brings new concern

Utilities in the state will need to pay more attention to risks to powerlines from wind and trees.

It’s not too late to reverse threats to our existence

In recent weeks I’ve met and engaged with some brilliant individuals who’ve… Continue reading

Prayer on high school field violates church-state separation

This so-called “freedom of speech” case brought to the U.S. Supreme Court… Continue reading

Not all rights are spelled out in the U.S. Constitution

A real flashpoint, Justice Samuel Alito, Sen. Lindsey Graham and others contend… Continue reading

Comment: Jan. 6 riot demands more than six hearings

Summarizing its work over two weeks could allow the House panel’s crucial work to be quickly forgotten.

Comment: At Constitution’s writing abortion was left to women

Those drafting the Constitution were largely content to have women quietly take care of the matter.

Comment: If Democrats want to win they have to simplify

For example, broad tax reform won’t fly, but they might find support for a smaller scale proposal.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Most Read