Steve Rochetta / National Park Service

Steve Rochetta / National Park Service

Editorial: Why grizzly bears need to return to the North Cascades

By The Herald Editorial Board

As awe-inspiring as the North Cascades National Park and its adjacent wilderness areas are, there is something missing, something that has left the wilderness without an important player in that ecosystem for about 150 years.

Grizzly bears, which may have originally numbered in the thousands in the North Cascades — and more than 50,000 throughout the West — were hunted to less than 400 in the region by the 1860s and now may number only 10 to 20 in the larger ecosystem that includes land in Washington state and British Columbia. In the past decade, there have been four confirmed reports of grizzly bear sightings in the 9,800 square miles of the park in Washington state and the 3,800 square miles in B.C.

The National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are working to wrap up a draft environmental impact statement on a plan to restore a self-supporting population of grizzlies to the ecosystem. Written comments on four options for the plan are being accepted until Tuesday.

Three options offer different rates of reintroduction; a fourth no-action option calls for habitat improvements that could aid in recovery but would not use relocation of bears to give restoration efforts a jump-start. Depending on the rate of relocation of bears from other regions in the West, the plans seek a self-sustaining population of 200 bears that would take as few as 25 years or as as long as a century to build.

Simply enhancing the habitat to support grizzly bears likely isn’t enough to aid in their return, as has been the case with gray wolves in Washington state and throughout the U.S. Relocating bears to remote areas of the park and wilderness would result in slow population growth. Grizzlies typically give birth to one or two cubs every three or four years, and only about 50 percent of cubs survive.

Because a reintroduction plan involves government intervention, as well as between $6 million and $8.5 million over the next 25 years, the costs, risks and benefits have to be considered.

And there are risks, particularly for those who travel into the North Cascades for recreation and those who live along the lands that border the park and wilderness areas.

Grizzlies do kill. Among the most recent deaths was that of a mountain biker in June outside Glacier National Park in Montana. But such attacks are infrequent. The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in Wyoming and Montana, which supports about 590 bears, had two fatal grizzly attacks in 2011, but Yellowstone’s last fatal attack prior to that was in 1984.

But risk has always been part of the wilderness experience. Climbing accidents and rockfalls have been the most common cause of death in the North Cascades in recent years. And visitors to Yellowstone, Glacier and other national parks that are home to grizzlies are more likely to die in a vehicle accident than in an encounter with a bear.

A recent guest commentary in The Herald by a conservationist, a hunter and angler, and a guidebook author, noted that safety concerns can be addressed through education programs on bear ecology and behavior and safe wilderness practices.

By why risk even the remote possibility of death?

Because the North Cascades are now something less than they were before the bears were hunted to near extinction. The return of 200 grizzlies to 9,800 square miles of land isn’t likely to result in the rewilding or “tropic cascade” that the return of gray wolves has had on some ecosystems, controlling the population of elk and other prey and allowing for a healthier ecosystem that supports a greater diversity of animals and plants.

But umbrella species, such as grizzlies, do play an ecological role, according to the advocacy group, Friends of the North Cascades Grizzly Bear. Because of what bears do in the woods, seeds from the plants on which the feed are spread, as are nutrients from the trout and salmon on which they also feed.

Anyone who has seen a grizzly in the wild will admit to a mixture of awe and fear, feelings that generate a renewed and healthier respect for wilderness.

For the same reason we want to save wild salmon runs and preserve pods of orcas in Puget Sound and the Salish Sea, we need to bring grizzlies back to the North Cascades: The wilderness would be less without them, as would we.

Comment on plan

For more information and to comment on the plans to restore grizzly bears to the North Cascades go to www.nps.gov/noca/grizzly.htm. Comment deadline is March 14.


Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, July 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Junelle Lewis, right, daughter Tamara Grigsby and son Jayden Hill sing “Lift Every Voice and Sing” during Monroe’s Juneteenth celebration on Saturday, June 18, 2022. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Happy Independence Days, America

Linked by history and promise, Juneteenth and the Fourth of July should be celebrated together.

FILE - In this Oct. 19, 2016 file photo, a man fishes for salmon in the Snake River above the Lower Granite Dam in Washington state. Three Republican U.S. House members from Washington state are criticizing Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., for opposing their legislation that would prevent the breaching of four dams on the Snake River to help improve endangered salmon runs. (Jesse Tinsley /The Spokesman-Review via AP, File)
Editorial: Waiting could force bad choice on dams, salmon

Work should begin now to begin replacing what four dams on the Snake River provide.

Joe Kennedy, a former assistant football coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Wash., poses for a photo March 9, 2022, at the school's football field. After losing his coaching job for refusing to stop kneeling in prayer with players and spectators on the field immediately after football games, Kennedy will take his arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, April 25, 2022, saying the Bremerton School District violated his First Amendment rights by refusing to let him continue praying at midfield after games. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Court majority weakens church, state separation

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision does more to hurt religious liberty than protect a coach’s prayer.

A pregnant protester is pictured with a message on her shirt in support of abortion rights during a march, Friday, June 24, 2022, in Seattle. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to end constitutional protections for abortion has cleared the way for states to impose bans and restrictions on abortion — and will set off a series of legal battles. (AP Photo/Stephen Brashear)
Editorial: Court’s decision a subtraction from our rights

Using a cherry-picked history, it limits the rights of women and will extend the reach of poverty.

Comment: America’s 250th offers opportunity to look forward

The bicentennial in 1976 focused on America’s history. We can use the ‘semiquin’ in 2026 to look ahead.

Downtown Everett perfect location for Sorticulture

I was at Sorticulture this year and what a great turnout (“Sorticulture,… Continue reading

No way to treat Lady Justice

Dear Lady Justice, your blindfold seems to be slipping down. Sir, my… Continue reading

Saunders: U.S. policy luring people to risky border crossing

Providing amnesty to those who have previously crossed illegally will only lead to more deaths.

Most Read