Supreme Court whistleblower alterted nation to crisis

First of all, Roe v. Wade didn’t endorse abortion, it passed responsibility for regulating abortions covered by a woman’s constitutional right to privacy to the states. The court’s new plan reveals what has been called “a Talibanesque attack on women’s rights.”

After the leak went public, Justice Clarence Thomas said, “Governmental institutions shouldn’t be bullied.” The source has been called a “leaker,” a bad apple, and his or her action “absolutely appalling.” But what if it is a governmental institution that is doing the bullying? What if a planned action of the Supreme Court would be more divisive and damaging to the nation than unauthorized exposure of it to the light of day? Would that change the narrative?

Thomas’ reaction joined with the politically polarized court’s effort to put a positive spin on its unpopular opposition to Roe v. Wade. The court’s home-court position as the nation’s final arbiter of law lets it push its partisan positions while elsewhere, public office holders caught similarly abusing the public’s trust would be charged with malfeasance.

The leak revealed a court conspiring to misuse its honored position in law to subvert existing law, a law of the land, and the will of a supermajority of citizens. The court’s conservatives had designed a combination anti-abortion law and Trojan horse to open the door to the divisive conservative Christian agenda. They were caught at it, thanks to a courageous whistleblower.

The so-called leaker, better described as “a whistleblower,” undoubtedly holds a law degree, and was aware that being identified would threaten their right to practice law. But what if that personal cost paled in comparison with what the plan would do to not only women’s reproductive rights, but lifestyles not approved by conservative Christians.

The whistleblower weighed personal risk against the cost of doing nothing and took the courageous course, revealing a greater respect for the law’s duty to protect basic freedoms than that held by the architects of the court’s draft of a plan to overturn Roe v Wade.

We have known better times: The Jan. 6 insurrection, a dysfunctional Congress, and now a court so politicized that it has made itself incapable of rendering decisions that ensure rights, freedom, and general welfare. We can do better. The world looks to us to elect and appoint better leaders.

Robert Graef

Mill Creek

Talk to us

More in Opinion

FILE - Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., speaks during a news conference the vote to codify Roe v. Wade, in this May 5, 2022 file photo on Capitol Hill in Washington. Murray is one of the U.S. Senate's most powerful members and seeking a sixth term. She is being challenged by Tiffany Smiley, a Republican from Pasco, Wash. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)
Editorial: Murray’s effective leadership warrants reelection

The five-term U.S. senator is a leader in the chamber yet works for needs of her constituents.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Oct. 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2022 Election campaign buttons with the USA flag - Illustration
Editorial: Retain Sen. Liias, Rep. Peterson in 21st district

The long-serving Democrats’ record of legislative success has earned leadership posts for both.

2022 Election campaign buttons with the USA flag - Illustration
Editorial: Return Duerr, Kloba to 1st District House seats

The two Democrats have been effective in passing legislation that serves residents’ needs.

Cassie Franklin, Mayor of Everett, delivers the annual state of the city address Thursday morning in the Edward D. Hansen Conference Center in Everett, Washington on March 31, 2022.  (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett’s budget crunch points to larger tax issue

The city’s deficit and a need for more revenue calls attention to reforms to the state’s tax structure.

FILE - The U.S. Supreme Court building is shown on May 4, 2022, in Washington. The Supreme Court says it will continue providing live audio broadcasts of arguments in cases, even as it welcomes the public back to its courtroom for a new term that begins Monday. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
Comment: Is the Supreme Court guided by principle or party?

There’s agreement the court has shifted but debate about what standards are behind its decisions.

Comment: Inslee’s vaccine mandate causing worker shortages

The CDC gave the governor an out from bad policy that has cost state workers theirs jobs.

Comment: Salmon won’t wait for us to be ready to remove dams

Gov. Inslee and Sen. Murray say removal isn’t feasible in the ‘near term.’ Neither is species’ survival.

Holocaust series shows danger in mixing politics, religion

As I’ve watched Ken Burn’s new PBS documentary series, “U.S. and the… Continue reading

Most Read