Comment: State should follow Arizona lead on school choice

Private schools have shown they do more with less funding. That’s a model that should be encouraged.

By Keri D. Ingraham / For The Herald

One of the biggest differences between public and private K-12 schools are the incentives.

Private schools are motivated to satisfy their customers, parents and families; be responsive or risk losing them. For the private school, losing a student equates to a direct loss of revenue. The loss of several students could jeopardize their financial stability since their business model is based on tuition revenue rather than government funding. Case in point: Private schools were creative and resourceful during the covid-19 school closures, finding solutions to fully reopen schools for five-day-a-week in-person learning throughout the 2020-21 school year.

Public schools, by significant contrast, had no such financial incentive to reopen schools. Funding was provided in full — plus hefty federal government covid-19 relief money — regardless of whether they offered full student instruction or supervision. In fact, they had an incentive to remain closed — using the reopening holdout as leverage to meet absurd teacher union demands. For example, the teacher union of the Los Angeles Unified School District (the second largest district in the country) demanded the defunding of the police, a moratorium on charter schools, and Medicare for all to reopen. In essence, they were holding children and teens hostage to demands that had nothing to do with providing learning for students or even their union members’ jobs.

Besides the lack of incentives to please their customers, public schools also lack strong incentives to produce academic results among their students. Again, unlike private schools, funding continues regardless of results. Families who lack the financial resources to pay private school tuition or move to a higher-performing school district are trapped in the system.

Data shows that private schools outperform public schools despite significantly lower spending per student. For example, the National Assessment of Educational Progress Exam scores reveal that private school students score significantly higher in each individual subject than public school peers at all testing grade levels (i.e., fourth, eighth and 12th). Yet, the national average private school tuition is $12,218 per student for the 2022-23 school year, while public school spending averages $16,862 per student. Washington state joins in with the excessive spending at an average of $16,800 per student as of 2020-21. Seattle Public Schools’ spending came in at $22,292 per student for 2021-22, nearly double that of the national private school tuition average.

Imagine the implications of a free market K-12 landscape in which parents are empowered to select the school they believe will best serve their students. The competition would push schools to provide quality, customer-focused learning. The result for our nation’s educational system, and our future, could be truly transformational.

The good news is it’s starting to happen. Arizona recently implemented universal school choice for all 1.1 million of the state’s K-12 students. According to a news release from the Office of Gov. Doug Ducey in July, “Arizona families who participate in ESAs would receive more than $6,500 per year per child for private school, homeschooling, microschools, tutoring or any other kinds of educational service that helps meet the needs of their students outside the traditional public school system.”

Education entrepreneurs — referred to as edupreneurs — are creating new schools and innovative new school models to meet the demand. The demand will grow quickly as more parents become aware of and take advantage of this unprecedented opportunity.

But the impact will not be limited to private and non-traditional education avenues. Traditional public schools in Arizona will also be influenced for the better. For the first time in history, on a large scale, free-market competition will provide the needed incentives for public schools to produce results and provide quality customer service; or they’ll continue to lose students to other options.

The benefits to students statewide will be enormous. And it will only be a matter of time before other states join Arizona in offering universal school choice. The question is: Which state will be next?

Washington state would be wise to follow Arizona’s lead for its own more than 1 million K-12 public school students. It could be the most strategic plan for the state with far-reaching workforce, societal and economic benefits.

Dr. Keri D. Ingraham is a fellow at Discovery Institute and Director of the Institute’s American Center for Transforming Education.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

A young man carries water past the destroyed buildings of a neighborhood in the Gaza Strip, Feb. 2, 2025. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “own” the Gaza Strip and transfer its population elsewhere has stirred condemnation and sarcasm, but it addresses a real and serious challenge: the future of Gaza as a secure, peaceful, even prosperous place. (Saher Alghorra/The New York Times)
Comment: ‘Homeland’ means exactly that to Gazans

Palestinians have long resisted resettlement. Trump’s plan to ‘clean out’ Gaza changes nothing.

Rent stabilization can keep more from losing homes

Thank you to The Herald Editorial Board for its editorial, regarding rent… Continue reading

Don’t pamper young criminals with lenient sentences

I want to give a shout out to Todd Welch for his… Continue reading

Comment: Democracy depends on support of local journalism

A state bill provides funding to support local news outlets through a modest tax on tech businesses.

Comment: Love is intoxicating; romance doesn’t have to be

Navigating sobriety while dating, with Valentine’s Day coming up, is possible and fulfilling.

Comment: State attempt at single-payer health care bound to fail

Other states have tried, but balked when confronted with the immense cost to state taxpayers.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

Forum: Requiem for a lost heavyweight: Sports Illustrated

SI, with Time and NatGeo, were a holy trinity for me and my dad. Now, it’s a world of AI clickbait.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.