Democratic presidential elector Bret Chiafalo stands outside the U.S. Court House before a hearing, Dec. 14, 2016, in Seattle. Chiafalo and other Washington state delegates to the Electoral College broke with their pledge to vote for the candidate that a majority of state’s voters elected and were fined $1,000. (Elaine Thompson/Associated Press file photo)

Democratic presidential elector Bret Chiafalo stands outside the U.S. Court House before a hearing, Dec. 14, 2016, in Seattle. Chiafalo and other Washington state delegates to the Electoral College broke with their pledge to vote for the candidate that a majority of state’s voters elected and were fined $1,000. (Elaine Thompson/Associated Press file photo)

Editorial: Problem is Electoral College, not ‘faithless electors’

A movement by state legislatures to elect the president by popular vote continues to add support.

By The Herald Editorial Board

Even as the 2020 presidential campaign ramps up, we’re still dealing with fallout from the last presidential election.

Enter the “faithless electors” — kids, if you’re looking for a band name, it’s yours — four members of Washington state’s Electoral College delegation who, rather than cast their votes in the Electoral College for Democrat Hillary Clinton following the election — as they had pledged to do — cast their votes for others. Doing so, under state law, earned them, including an Everett-area man, a $1,000 fine, a case that is now on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A quick refresher: U.S. presidents, since the Constitutional Convention of 1787, have not been elected by popular vote. Instead, the election’s winner is determined by the Electoral College, where all of a state’s delegates are awarded, winner-take-all, to the candidate winning a majority in that state. The number of state delegates uses the same rationale used to determine the size of each state’s delegation in the House of Representatives, plus the two senators. With 538 national electors, a candidate needs at least 270 to win the White House.

Usually, the outcome of the popular vote and the electoral vote are in alignment, but on five occasions — including the 2000 race between Republican George W. Bush and Democrat Al Gore and the 2016 race between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton — the two diverged with the Democratic candidates winning the popular vote and the Republicans winning the Electoral College vote and the presidency.

The four “faithless electors” and three others elsewhere in the nation bolted from their pledge. Everett’s Bret Chiafalo, calling himself a “Hamilton” elector — sorry; Lin-Manuel Miranda got to that one first — initially hoped to foil Trump’s election by offering to trade his vote for Clinton to an elector in another state pledged to Trump. The effort failed, but the “faithless” remained so on principle.

Legislation in the state Senate seeks to head off such protests in the future. Senate Bill 5074, would require parties and independent candidates to nominate electors and an alternate, and would disqualify an elector who refused to cast a ballot for the candidate winning the state’s popular vote, substituting the vote of the alternate, if necessary. It would also eliminate the $1,000 fine for electors who don’t vote as pledged.

It’s up to the Supreme Court to make a final ruling on the philosophical question of whether electors can use their own judgment in casting their ballot.

As for the state legislation, which has passed out of committee and is expected to get a vote on the Senate floor, while it would provide more certainty to the process, it doesn’t address the problem with the Electoral College’s occasional divergence from the popular vote.

Because of its structure, the Electoral College can give greater weight to the votes of those in states with smaller populations. Some have defended this as a plus precisely because it gives those smaller states a greater voice, but that acknowledgement is an argument against itself; a violation of the basic tenet of our representative democracy of one person and one vote.

Eliminating the Electoral College would require the heavy lift of a constitutional amendment, but another option is gaining support that would keep the college in place but reform it through a multi-state pact.

The National Popular Vote, an organization that seeks to give greater consideration to the popular vote, is asking state legislatures to pass a law that would award all their electors not to the winner of that state but to the candidate who wins the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. To enact the change, states representing 270 electoral votes — the same threshold that determines the presidency — would have to the adopt the popular vote bill.

Washington state adopted the legislation in 2009. Eleven other states — totaling 172 electoral votes — have passed similar legislation.

Thursday, Colorado’s House and Senate passed legislation that will add its nine electoral votes to the mix for a total of 181. Colorado’s governor has said he will sign the legislation. And earlier this month, legislation passed in New Mexico’s House that would add its five electoral votes.

In seven states, including Oregon, totaling 75 votes, it has passed one chamber, and the proposal has been considered in 16 other states totalling more than 120 votes.

The Electoral College, designed as fail-safe on the popular vote, is no longer necessary, if it ever was. The National Popular Vote compact corrects that.

Video: A Teach with TVW Documentary explores the 2016 Washington State Electoral College and shows the struggle some electors had with their vote, while experts and state officials discuss how presidents are chosen in the United States. (Produced by TVW)

Talk to us

More in Opinion

The Snohomish County Auditor's Office is one of many locations where primary election ballots can be dropped off on Tuesday. (Sue Misao / The Herald) 20180806
Editorial: Voting’s a duty, but should it be mandatory?

Legislation to require voter registration and voting needs more discussion among the public, first.

Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Herald columnist Julie Muhlstein received this card, by mail at her Everett home, from the Texas-based neo-Nazi organization Patriot Front.  The mail came in June, a month after Muhlstein wrote about the group's fliers being posted at Everett Community College and in her neighborhood.  (Dan Bates / The Herald)

(Dan Bates / The Herald)
Editorial: Treat violent extremism as the disease it is

The state Attorney General urges a commission to study a public health response to domestic terrorism.

Photo Courtesy The Boeing Co.
On September 30, 1968, the first 747-100 rolled out of Boeing's Everett factory.
Editorial: What Boeing workers built beyond the 747

More than 50 years of building jets leaves an economic and cultural legacy for the city and county.

Marysville School District Superintendent Zac Robbins, who took his role as head of the district last year, speaks during an event kicking off a pro-levy campaign heading into a February election on Thursday, Jan. 5, 2023, at the Marysville Historical Society Museum in Marysville, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Voters have role in providing strong schools

A third levy failure for Marysville schools would cause even deeper cuts to what students are owed.

Marysville schools working hard to improve, help them with levy

As an educator in Marysville, I feel compelled to share how important… Continue reading

HeraldNet app allows me to keep up with news

First I was pretty miffed. I’m 76, my wife says I’m a… Continue reading

Ban net-pen fish farms in federal waters, too

As we go into 2023, we all want to start the new… Continue reading

Saunders: If Hunter Biden’s looking for cash, he’s in trouble

He hasn’t faced criminal charges before for his indiscretions, but that may be changing soon.

Most Read