I read with interest The Herald article about reintroducing grizzly bears to the North Cascades (“‘Hell, no to grizzlies’: Darrington locals give federal agencies an earful,” The Herald, Nov. 4). Reading through the article I didn’t see anything mentioned about the ecosystem that exists (or had existed) in that region; or any description from anyone about the impact on that ecosystem once the bears had disappeared (we humans made that happen).
Ecosystems are about balance; one part of that system in some way affects every other part of the system. In effect, reestablishing the bear population could and should return that ecosystem to that balance; if their absence, for however long they were gone, didn’t already restructure that ecosystem in some way.
Wild animals don’t take from the environment, they are “part” of the environment, and live “with” it, in the same way that indigenous peoples have played a similar part; if they take away, they give something back in return. A good example of that is the story about what happened when gray wolves were reintroduced back into Yellowstone Park; and the positive impacts on the environment that occurred due to that reintroduction. You can find that story on YouTube; very interesting!
Jim Bloss
Monroe
Talk to us
- You can tell us about news and ask us about our journalism by emailing newstips@heraldnet.com or by calling 425-339-3428.
- If you have an opinion you wish to share for publication, send a letter to the editor to letters@heraldnet.com or by regular mail to The Daily Herald, Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.
- More contact information is here.
