Comment: One measure delivers fair wage to workers, employers

Everett’s Initiative 24-02 will increase the minimum wage, but counts tips toward the $20.24 rate.

By Carrie deKubber and Kerri Lonergan-Dreke / For The Herald

There are two initiatives on the November ballot to raise Everett’s minimum wage to $20.24 per hour. How are Everett voters who want to raise the minimum wage to decide between the two?

Here’s some helpful clarification. While both initiatives would raise Everett’s minimum wage to just five pennies under the highest citywide minimum wage in the nation, Initiative 24-01 will harm small businesses and our local economy; Initiative 24-02 will not.

Initiative 24-02 is the responsible way to raise the minimum wage for local workers, small businesses, and the Everett community.

We are local small business owners. We care about our team members. We pay their paychecks, and we support providing Everett workers with higher wages. We also care about our community, and we need to raise the wage in a way that will not negatively impact local residents.

Initiative 24-02 ensures all workers earn at least $20.24 an hour, while recognizing all forms of compensation; including tips and benefits.

Everett tipped employees are already making well above the minimum wage. A recent survey of Everett restaurants shows tipped employees earn an average of $15.94 per hour. In other words, tipped employees earn nearly as much as the state minimum wage (currently $16.28 per hour) in tips alone.

Under 24-02, these employees — who already earn nearly twice the state’s minimum wage — will continue to do so. No employee would earn less than $20.24 an hour. No employer would pay less than the state minimum wage. If an employee earns tips, that employer can count up to $3.96 per hour of those tips to meet the $20.24 wage. No employee is dependent upon tips to make the minimum wage. Every employee has certainty of their minimum compensation. If an employee does not earn tips, their employer pays the full $20.24 per hour.

This model has been used successfully in other Washington cities that have raised their local minimum wage and in progressive cities across the nation.

Why is this the best and most responsible and sustainable way to raise Everett’s minimum wage?

First, a $4 per hour wage increase for employees represents a 25 percent cost increase for local small businesses. If employers were to bear this cost burden themselves, it would very likely force many to raise prices, among other bad options.

Everett voters have no doubt noticed the increased cost of goods and services across our local economy, such as food, groceries, and child care. Adding large costs to local small businesses and non-profits will only accelerate this trend.

Second, tips are considered wages by the federal government; employees who receive tips pay taxes on them with the IRS and employers pay payroll taxes on these tips. It’s not unreasonable or unfair for a small portion of this tipped income to be factored into an employee’s overall compensation calculation.

Doing so doesn’t make employees reliant on tips; 24-02 neither requires employees to receive tips nor penalizes them if they don’t.

Third, increasing the minimum wage without the flexibility provided by 24-02 would harm restaurants in particular; and fundamentally alter the hospitality experience we aim to provide to our guests.

People love and rely on restaurants, but it’s never been harder to operate a restaurant in Washington. Recent industry data about Washington’s restaurants is sobering for anyone in the state for whom dining out is an essential part of their weekly meal plan.

After paying out all costs required to operate their business, your local restaurant owner takes home just 1.5 percent of revenues coming in. This is 60 percent lower than the national average, and the lowest we’ve seen at any point in history.

Nearly 40 percent of our costs are labor costs — which is 10 percent higher than the national average — even though we employ 20 percent fewer workers. A 25 percent increase on top of this would be unsustainable.

You favorite local restaurant can’t absorb this increase and would be left with few places to go to manage it. They could reduce their hours of operation or cut staff, but that means reduced paychecks for employees or fewer paychecks altogether.

They could increase menu prices, but Washington menu prices are already 12 percent higher than the national average; and higher menu prices hurts working families, who rely on restaurants an average of 6.3 meals per week.

They could move away from a tipping model and institute a service charge instead, but that would also dramatically cut the paychecks of employees who currently rely on tips as wages.

They could do all of the above. Speaking again from first-hand experience, restaurant operators don’t want to do any of the above.

The good news is, there’s another option. We can ensure that Everett workers receive a higher wage, without picking winners and losers.

Vote yes on 24-02 to support workers, local small businesses and non-profits, and the whole Everett community.

Carrie deKubber is the owner of Bob’s Burgers and Brew in Everett. Kerri Lonergan-Dreke is the co-owner of Lombardi’s Italian Restaurant & Wine Bar.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

The Everett Public Library in Everett, Washington on Thursday, Jan. 19, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Editorial: What do you want and what are you willing to pay?

As local governments struggle to fund services with available revenue, residents have decisions ahead.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Dec. 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Children play and look up at a large whale figure hanging from the ceiling at the Imagine Children’s Museum on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Making your holiday shopping count for even more

Gifts of experiences can be found at YMCA, Village Theatre, Schack and Imagine Children’s Museum.

Stephens: Biden’s pardon of son a disgrace and a betrayal

Biden’s action to protect his son from consequences proves what Trump’s supporters believed all along.

French: Welcome stranger in by supporting homeless outreach

Feeding and sheltering those in need won’t alone fix homelessness, but it builds relationships that can.

Comment: Bipartisanship’s prospects, advantages to be tested

In Minnesota and D.C., lawmakers may find that little will get done without some give and take.

FILE — Bill Nye, the science educator, in New York, March 5, 2015. Nye filed a $37 million lawsuit against Disney and its subsidiaries on Aug. 25, 2017, alleging that he was deprived of extensive profits from his show “Bill Nye, the Science Guy,” which ran on PBS from 1993 to 1998. (Jake Naughton/The New York Times)
Editorial: What saved climate act? Good sense and a Science Guy

A majority kept the Climate Commitment Act because of its investments, with some help from Bill Nye.

FILE - In this Jan. 22, 2019, file photo, Washington Supreme Court Justice Steven González listens to testimony during a hearing in Olympia, Wash. González has been elected as the next chief justice of the Washington state Supreme Court. He was elected by his colleagues on Thursday, Nov. 5, 2020, according to a news release sent by the court. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: Daunting fix to fund right to public defenders

With a court system in crisis, threatening justice, local governments say they can’t pick up the tab.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Dec. 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

McMillian Cottom: How to help those still devasted by Helene

Among charities, consider Southern Smoke, which aids families employed in the hospitality industry.

Comment: As tariffs looming, holiday deals may not return soon

Aside from some January sales, you can expect retailers to offer fewer deals once tariffs are in effect.

Residents from the south celebrate as they return to their homes, south of Beirut, Nov. 27, 2024. A cease-fire meant to end the deadliest war in decades between Israel and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah officially took effect early Wednesday, less than a day after President Biden announced the deal and Israel approved its terms. (Daniel Berehulak /The New York Times)
Comment: What the ceasefire means; and what it doesn’t

Hopes for a broader Mideast peace are faint at best, but stability provides a path for further agreements.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.