Comment: Pennies’ end brings necesssary change to change

Not making cents — and nickels, too — makes financial sense for the country. Get used to rounding.

By Sheldon H. Jacobson / Tribune News Service

One thing you can say about the president is that he likes to change things.

He wanted the Gulf of Mexico renamed the Gulf of America, signing an executive order making it the official name for the federal government. He also signed an executive order changing the highest peak in the nation back to Mount McKinley from Denali. He renamed the Department of Defense the Department of War, a name that it held until after the 1947 National Security Act was passed into law.

The one change that will directly impact Americans is his proposal to eliminate the penny. Though the first three changes raised some eyebrows, and perhaps were more symbolic than substantive, the fourth has some teeth and makes good sense.

The cost of producing a one cent coin was 3.69 cents in 2024, broken down by materials (which is now mostly zinc), administration, and distribution. 3.172 billion one cent coins were produced in 2024, placing $31.72 million of monetary value into circulation at a cost of $117 million. From a purely cost-savings perspective, adding more penny coins to circulation provides a negative return on investment.

Numerous other countries have already eliminated the penny coin or its equivalent. Canada did so back in 2012 and has never looked back. They also eliminated one dollar and two dollar banknotes in favor of coins, back in 1989 and 1996, respectively, now affectionately known as loonies and toonies. Such a change is not something our nation appears ready for anytime soon.

There is a precedent with the Treasury eliminating coin denominations. In 1792, the U.S. had 10 denominations of coinage: half-cent, one cent, half-dime, dime, quarter, half-dollar, one-dollar, quarter-eagle ($2.50), half-eagle ($5), and eagle ($10). In 1857, production of the half-cent coin was stopped, given the limited economic value (buying power) that it provided. Other coin denominations (two-cent, three-cent, 20-cent, and $3-dollar) all came and went at varying times between 1851 and 1889.

With around 86 percent of financial transactions now done electronically, and with this number growing over time, pennies have become akin to noise in many cash transactions. Given that one cent in 1857 has the equivalent buying power of 37 cents today, the value of a penny has become negligible.

The loudest and perhaps most worthy argument in favor of keeping the penny is that those in the lowest socio-economic strata, who almost exclusively rely on the cash economy could be negatively impacted with the elimination of pennies. However, stopping the production of pennies does not mean that they will instantaneously cease to exist. In Canada, pennies remain legal tender and can be exchanged at any financial institution. Moreover, the nickel has effectively replaced their smallest unit of coin circulation, with rounding up or down used to determine cash prices.

Yet why stop with pennies? The cost of producing nickels was 13.78 cents in 2024. From a cost savings perspective, eliminating nickels should also be considered, leaving the 10-cent dime as the smallest coin produced. This would be equivalent to moving the decimal place over by one space in cash transactions, making a dime the de facto new penny.

Consumers would bear a small cost of such eliminations, estimated by the Federal Reserve to be $6 million annually for pennies and $56 million annually for nickels, mostly due to skewed price rounding. No longer producing pennies and nickels would also yield a cost savings to the U.S. Mint far above $100 million annually, a positive return on investment. Given that the U.S. population is now over 340 million, the resulting consumer costs translate into two cents and 17 cents per person annually, respectively.

Though the cost savings in not producing pennies and nickels may be the strongest argument, the best reason is more fundamental: changes in buying power have historically dictated coinage denomination changes and needs, and should continue to do so. Unfortunately, our nation has a disappointing record of being slow to adapt to changes that the rest of the world have embraced for their own betterment.

To illustrate this point, the U.S. made an effort to switch to the metric system in 1976, which the majority of the world uses. Adopting such standardization provides economic advantages, particularly in products distributed through global trade. Good faith efforts were made, including the creation of the United States Metric Board to support the conversion. All such efforts failed, with metric measures generally not well received and eventually falling by the wayside.

Change is hard; leaving the status quo alone is easy. But just because something is easy does not mean that it is ideal. The time to sunset both pennies and nickels has arrived. Much like coins that fell by the wayside in the past, leave them to numismatists to enjoy in their collections and for the history that they possess for future generations.

Speaking of sunsets, the end of daylight saving time has occurred. Perhaps the president will also take the necessary steps to stop the clock change gymnastics once and for all.

Sheldon H. Jacobson, Ph.D., is a computer science professor in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. ©2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks alongside President Donald Trump during an event announcing a drug pricing deal with Pfizer in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Sept. 30, 2025. Advisers to Kennedy appear poised to make consequential changes to the childhood vaccination schedule, delaying a shot that is routinely administered to newborns and discussing big changes to when or how other childhood immunizations are given. (Pete Marovich/The New York Times)
Editorial: As CDC fades, others must provide vaccine advice

A CDC panel’s recommendation on the infant vaccine for hepatitis B counters long-trusted guidance.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Dec. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: FDA’s vaccine memo reckless, dangerous to public health

It offers no supporting evidence for its claims of children’s deaths and talks vaguely of broad changes.

Bouie: Support efforts of those helping meet needs in your area

In every committee, groups strive to meet the needs of others who lack proper shelter and nutrition.

French: Immigrant outreach answers current darkness with light

New Life Centers of Chicago answers the call in Leviticus to love the stranger as one’s self.

Comment: Using SNAP as leverage was bad idea first time around

The White House says it intends to suspend food aid in blue states that refuse to surrender data on recipients.

Comment: It really is the economy, stupid

A new study strengthens evidence that trust in government increases with good economic management.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Dec. 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Customers look at AR-15-style rifles on a mostly empty display wall at Rainier Arms Friday, April 14, 2023, in Auburn, Wash. as stock dwindles before potential legislation that would ban future sale of the weapons in the state. House Bill 1240 would ban the future sale, manufacture and import of assault-style semi-automatic weapons to Washington State and would go into immediate effect after being signed by Gov. Jay Inslee. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)
Editorial: Long fight for state’s gun safety laws must continue

The state’s assault weapons ban was upheld in a state court, but more challenges remain ahead.

Comment: Trump’s common-man anger has lost its focus, purpose

What’s different now is where he could once shape the public zeitgeist, he now appears out of touch.

Comment: GOP Tenn. win offers little solace for 2026 prospects

The Republican won by 9 points but it’s a margin dwarfed by Trump’s win in 2024, mimicking other recent results.

Comment: Relaxing fuel-effiency won’t be much help to consumers

Vehicles aren’t likely to become much cheaper and you’ll pay for more gas. Automakers will benefit, though.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.