Comment: Put sales tax increase for housing before voters

The County Council is moving too quickly and without a sense for the public’s support of a new tax.

By Nate Nehring / For The Herald

Last week, a proposal was introduced at the Snohomish County Council to increase the countywide sales tax rate by one tenth of 1 percent for the purpose of making housing more affordable. The merit of the underlying proposal should be subject to healthy debate and scrutiny. But what is even more concerning than the tax increase itself is the rushed process being used, which minimizes transparency, deliberation and public input.

Typically, proposals to increase the sales tax rate are placed on the ballot for consideration by the voters. However, the passage of House Bill 1590 earlier this year by the Washington state Legislature provides a carve-out which “eliminates the requirement that the imposition of the tax be subject to the approval of a majority of county or city voters” when the tax revenue is dedicated toward affordable housing. This allows for cities and counties to raise the tax with only a majority vote of a county or city council, avoiding a vote of the people.

Enacting a countywide sales tax increase councilmanically may be legal, but that doesn’t make it right. Elected officials serve at the pleasure of the public; and we ought to remember that the funds in question belong to the taxpayers. If advocates of this proposal believe that this is the most effective way to solve homelessness, then they should make that case to the voters and be open to a robust public process which includes a ballot measure.

In addition to avoiding a public vote, this Snohomish County proposal has been fast-tracked to circumvent the traditional timeline and instead be adopted at the last County Council meeting before Christmas, this coming Wednesday. There is no reason that this process should be rushed. In fact, I would argue that we ought to take more time than usual given the gravity of this decision, which is projected to raise more than $100 million in additional sales tax revenue, collected from taxpayers over the next five years.

Regarding the merit of the underlying proposal, there is no question that homelessness and the associated issues of drug abuse, mental health and crime represent one of the greatest challenges our community faces. What is subject to debate, however, is how to best address this challenge.

The City of Seattle faces the most significant homelessness issue in our state, perhaps in our entire nation. Their “solution” typically involves putting a higher number of taxpayer dollars toward the problem, amounting in hundreds of millions of dollars per year. Despite all of the money thrown at the problem, the situation has undeniably worsened. Why should we look to replicate this failed approach in Snohomish County?

As a letter from the Lynnwood City Council to the County Council opposing this sales tax increase rightly points out, sales tax is a regressive form of taxation. It disproportionally burdens the poor and the working class in our communities. While Snohomish County families continue to feel the negative impacts of high inflation and small businesses struggle to recover from recent economic restrictions, it’s difficult to imagine a worse time to propose increasing the countywide sales tax.

Regardless of varying opinions in support or opposition of the underlying tax increase proposal, I believe a process involving transparency, deliberation and public input must be prioritized. Snohomish County voters should have their say on this critical matter; we can and should ensure that happens by placing this measure on the ballot for a public vote.

Nate Nehring serves on the Snohomish County Council, representing the 1st District. He lives in Arlington.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Dec. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

An electric vehicle charges at an EVgo fast charging station in Detroit, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2022. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
Editorial: Start work now to power electric vehicle future

The goal for more electric cars will require a beefed-up grid and a network of charging stations.

A pedestrian uses the crosswalk at 30th Street NE along 113th Avenue NE near Lake Stevens High School on Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Stepped-up effort needed to reduce traffic deaths

Lawmakers, local officials and drivers, themselves, need to put more emphasis on traffic safety.

A floating offshore wind turbine platform is part of a six-turbine, 50 megawatt wind farm off the coast of Aberdeen, Scotland. (Starkraft)
Editorial: Answer for environment, maritime jobs blowing in wind

Floating offshore wind farms could be a boon for maritime employers like Everett’s Dunlap Towing.

Comment: Judge’s ruling may end protections for abuse victims

Citing a Supreme Court ruling, a Texas judge has allowed a man with a protection order to possess a gun.

Why wasn’t Everett shooting suspect arrested earlier on warrants?

A recent Herald story (“Man charged in Everett shooting that left man… Continue reading

‘Grain to Table’ story offered full loaf on local food producation

Taylor Goebel’s recent article about the connection between an Edmond’s bakery, a… Continue reading

Logging sales of legacy forests shouldn’t fund new schools

A recent story in Cascadia Daily News, “Whatcom’s ‘Box of Rain’ forest… Continue reading

Fact Check: Not grasping Constitution, Trump tries to bend it

The former president has often praised it but more often misinterprets it to fit the outcomes he seeks.

Most Read