By Megan Dunn / For The Herald
Deliberating and approving the county budget each year is the most important decision that our county council makes.
Our county budget is a reflection of our shared values, and I take that responsibility very seriously. An equally important responsibility is to ensure that we as a county are being good stewards of taxpayer dollars, while still providing essential services.
There has unfortunately been an onslaught of misinformation about the proposed budget with uncorrected misunderstandings of the impacts it would have on households in the county. This misinformation has only muddied conversations and unnecessarily brought fear and uncertainty to residents in our county. As elected leaders, it’s our duty to provide accurate and transparent information to residents, not monger resentment and burn bridges.
It’s time to set the record straight, temper emotions, and pledge that we will engage in civil and factual discourse.
Since 2001 our county’s general fund budget has been limited by state law to grow by only 1 percent each year, however expenses tend to grow by 4 percent per year because government also experiences the pressures of inflation like the rest of the community. There have been times when previous budgets did not implement the 1 percent increase, but instead banked it to use at a later date — a term called “banked capacity.” At this point, the county has 6 percent in banked capacity. State law expressly allows for this practice. Recently, this imbalance between allowed budget growth and increases to the cost of doing business has been felt strongly as costs have far outpaced the 1 percent cap. Despite this imbalance, the county has worked for years to find efficiencies, reduce spending and diligently tighten our belts, and this year is no exception. In order to preserve services and avoid layoffs the proposed biennial budget includes 3 percent in cuts and under-spending to general fund departments, but these cuts aren’t enough to preserve services.
The current proposed biennial budget from the County Executive includes an increase in our county’s levy rate which draws down our full banked capacity. This would be the 1 percent allowed increase, plus the 3 percent of our banked capacity, for a total of 4 percent for 2025, and a duplicate 4 percent in 2026. It’s important to remember that this proposed increase is not an increase in your overall property tax bill, it only applies to the county portion of your property taxes which is about 6 percent of your overall tax bill. The current levy rate would increase a little more than 2 cents per $1,000 of a property’s assessed value. For a house valued at $650,000 the increase would be around $14 to $15 of property taxes for the year.
It bears repeating: the proposed 8 percent property tax increase over two years only applies to the county’s portion of your property tax bill, which is about 6 percent of your overall bill, would amount to about $14 to $15 additional each year, and would prevent cuts to public safety and other essential services in the county.
During budget deliberations, we have heard from council members who support no increase in the levy rate. One amendment would cut $8 million and includes $1 million in cuts from our sheriff’s department, which I oppose. Now is not the time to defund our sheriff’s department when public safety is a top concern for community members. Other cuts to our parks department, courts, elections office, public health and general fund departments would hamper our county’s quality of life and ability to meet the community’s needs. An alternative amendment would strike a balance by preserving some county services, but also not taking the full amount of bank capacity needed to adequately maintain all county services and relies on spending down our savings to potentially unstable levels.
Another proposed amendment to cut the executive department misconstrues findings from a recent audit to justify the elimination of targeted positions, programs and funding for our Office of Social Justice and the investments that they provide to community groups. These employees and investments bring great value to our county, and we shouldn’t make isolated cuts to their important work.
It’s critical that elected leadership fosters an environment where this budget dialogue starts from a shared baseline of facts. Only then can we cultivate civility and understanding across the diverse opinions of ways that our county budget should be allocated.
The council is scheduled to make a final vote on the county’s 2025-26 budget on Monday, Nov. 25, at the 9 a.m. Public Hearing meeting.
Megan Dunn, a Democrat, is a member of the Snohomish County Council, representing the 2nd District, which includes Tulalip, Everett, Mukilteo and unincorporated parts of the county.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
