Public health cuts: a prescription for poor health

  • By Barbara J. Bly, RN, and Mara Marano-Bianco, RN
  • Friday, August 29, 2008 3:01pm
  • OpinionCommentary

Which of the following is acceptable to you, your family and your community?

— An increase in newborn and infant deaths along with a rise in child abuse due to lack of services to thousands of impacted families and pregnant women.

— An increase in measles and pertussis (whooping cough) outbreaks due to 10,000 fewer immunizations each year.

— An increase in head lice, infectious diarrhea and Hepatitis B cases for our children when hundreds of child care centers do not receive the necessary information on hygiene and safety, and prevention of infections and communicable diseases.

— An increased risk of tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases when thousands of high-risk individuals are not treated.

The continued and proposed cuts in public health spending from Snohomish County will result in all of the above, along with a lack of access to basic human needs such as food, housing and health-care referrals for thousands, including children. It will also severely impact our readiness to respond in the event of a health and security threat such as a flu epidemic, natural disasters or bioterrorism.

The proposed cuts along with an ever-increasing case load acuity of the public health nurses will lead to the degradation of the public safety net and an immediate impact on public safety and quality of care. Though some of the effected are the most highly vulnerable and often invisible populations, the local health department has responsibility for people of all ages, incomes and ethnic backgrounds.

Public health nurses are on the frontlines of the system and witness every day the positive impact that public health has across communities. As registered nurses, we understand and see the consequences every day of the crumbling public health system.

The community has come to rely on the Snohomish Health District and its public health nurses for many types of direct and preventative care, including:

— clinic services for immunizations, refugee screening, travel consultation, screening and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases;

— communicable disease prevention and control, as with tuberculosis and pertussis;

— prenatal health to prevent negative birth outcomes;

— parenting skills and child development education to prevent child abuse and infant mortality;

— assessment and interventions with children who have special health-care needs;

— health consultation and training of early childhood care providers; and

— assistance in accessing appropriate health care and other community services.

Many of our community partners rely on the referrals and support provided by our programs to ensure the health of our community. These include criminal justice/corrections, school districts, prenatal and health-care providers, DSHS, food banks, housing resources, mental health agencies, hospitals, child-care licensers and providers, and chemical dependency treatment and domestic violence programs. The dissolution of public health funding and services will lead to higher human services caseloads, fewer resources and higher health-care costs.

The public health system in Snohomish County, along with all of Washington’s public health system, is in jeopardy due to decades of neglect and erosion in public health spending. The ability of our local public health department to perform its core functions has been greatly reduced.

Public health is the most cost-effective system for disease prevention and health improvement. Yet, only 2 percent of the total health care dollars are spent on public health services, and Washington ranks 44th in the nation in per capita spending on public health.

Clearly, the current system is grossly inadequate. Any further cut to the system is simply irresponsible and places the community at unacceptable risk. Public health is the epicenter of a quality health-care system and is the most cost-effective system for disease prevention and health improvement. It is our first line of defense in responding to a communicable disease outbreak, bioterrorism or other health disaster.

Public health funding is a top priority for the Washington State Nurses Association and it needs to be a top priority for the people of Snohomish County and the state. We must hold public officials, at both the local and state level, accountable for restoring and increasing public health funding to ensure the health of our community. The health of our communities is very much dependent on our public health departments and public health nurses.

Public health and public health nursing is the center of a medical care system that promotes the health of our communities and plays a key role in disease prevention. If you’re not aware of their work, it’s a sign that public health departments and public health nurses are doing their jobs well.

Barbara J. Bly of Everett is chair and Mara Marano-Bianco of Mukilteo is co-chair of the Washington State Nurses Association unit that represents Snohomish County public health nurses. Bly has worked as a public health nurse for 30 years, Marano-Bianco for 13.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

November 17, 2025: But Her Emails
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Where are cartoons lampooning Kamala Harris?

I agree with a recent letter writer, The Herald Opinion page’s cartoons… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons are satire; it’s to be expected

I have read and sent letters to the editor of The Herald… Continue reading

People should rely on own savings not on goverment assistance

Laudable is the social legislation that provides 26 weeks of subsidies to… Continue reading

Comment: What climate ‘realists’ miss are pledges’ quiet wins

Climate fatalists should consider that nations committed to reductions are meeting their targets.

Comment: Too many kids can’t read; blame lack of spelling tests

Leaving the task to spellcheck holds back kids’ skill and love of reading. Spelling is key to comprehension.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

Comment: Ignoring Trump, stock market believes in climate crisis

Green energy and cleantech indices are outperforming the overall market. You can partially thanks AI’s demand.

Comment: Shutdown raises profile of childcare as an issue

With work requirements on or coming for SNAP and Medicaid, more families will rely on Head Start.

Saunders: Shutdown is over; recriminations for Democrats aren’t

Except for a handful of heroes, the Democrats need to explain why they put so many through this.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.