Saunders: The big difference between protest and intimidation

Efforts to intimidate members of the Supreme Court go against rules of civility and democratic standards.

By Debra J. Saunders / syndicated columnist

Let’s call the mass gatherings held outside the homes of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh what they are: They’re not protests; they are mob intimidation.

When activists gather and chant in front of justices’ homes after an unprecedented leak of a draft opinion to overturn Roe v. Wade, they are warning the Supreme Court that bad-faith actors know where they live. They are bringing the fight to the justices’ families.

Wednesday, the pro-abortion group Ruth Sent Us expanded its targets to all six justices appointed by Republican presidents. I fear where activists’ next expansion might lead.

“If you take away our choices, we will riot,” protester Lacie Wooten-Holway told WUSA9 in front of Kavanaugh’s home.

Old-school rules of civility mean nothing.

“The View” host Joy Behar applauded the homefront protests on the grounds that intimidation tactics are warranted.

“It shows Alito what it feels like to lose your freedom of choice. He cannot leave the house easily, so maybe that’s a good lesson for them,” said Behar.

She’s ill-informed and wrong.

If the Supreme Court overturns Roe, states can decide if they want restrictions on abortion or not. That’s choice, rendered by elected officials chosen by their peers.

But also, if it’s OK to threaten justices because you think they will take away other people’s choice on abortion, what is OK to do if you think abortion is akin to murder? What’s good for the goose … .

It did not bode well for the Supreme Court when Politico first reported on a 98-page draft written by Alito to overturn Roe. With that unprecedented leak, the big bench’s facade of being above factionalism was shattered.

Not that the White House seems to mind.

Asked Tuesday if President Biden considers protests in front of justices’ homes undue interference, press secretary Jen Psaki replied that Biden supports “peaceful protest.” And she called out conservatives who remained silent when activists protested outside the homes of school board members and the Michigan secretary of state.

It’s a child’s retort; decreeing that bad behavior is permissible because the other side does something like it.

If Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg were alive, I truly doubt she would approve of these coercive tactics.

Ginsburg’s friendship with the late Justice Antonin Scalia was legendary.

In 2020, shortly after Ginsburg died, Scalia’s son Eugene, then President Donald Trump’s Labor secretary, wrote in The Washington Post about the bond between the two justices: “Not for a moment did one think the other should be condemned or ostracized. More than that, they believed that what they were doing — arriving at their own opinions thoughtfully and advancing them vigorously — was essential to the national good.”

That’s what Psaki should have said. That’s what Biden should say.

Debra J. Saunders is a fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Chapman Center for Citizen Leadership. Email her at dsaunders@discovery.org.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, July 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Joe Kennedy, a former assistant football coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Wash., poses for a photo March 9, 2022, at the school's football field. After losing his coaching job for refusing to stop kneeling in prayer with players and spectators on the field immediately after football games, Kennedy will take his arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, April 25, 2022, saying the Bremerton School District violated his First Amendment rights by refusing to let him continue praying at midfield after games. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Court majority weakens church, state separation

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision does more to hurt religious liberty than protect a coach’s prayer.

Schwab: May it please the court; because the rest of us aren’t

The Supreme Court’s ‘Sanctimonious Six’ have enshrined a theocratic plutocracy in the the law.

More than access to abortion is at stake, women

This is to the ladies; I don’t want to start a debate… Continue reading

City of Snohomish tax break for developer hurts taxpayers

Property owners of the city of Snohomish are in for a huge… Continue reading

Please reconsider private fireworks on Fourth of July

The Fourth of July is fast approaching. I know many of us… Continue reading

Comment: What Biden’s low poll numbers mean for midterms

It’s not that his numbers won’t improve as inflation eases, but will it be too late to help Democrats on Nov. 9?

Comment: Abortion rights activists can make points viscerally

Anti-abortion protesters used gore to make their points. It’s time to use similar images to win back access.

Comment: Child care key to fixing the U.S. labor shortage

Public support of child care — as we do for K-12 education — would allow more parents to take open jobs.

Most Read