The Point Wells industrial area next to Woodway. (BSRE Point Wells)

The Point Wells industrial area next to Woodway. (BSRE Point Wells)

Hearing examiner denies Point Wells high-rise condo proposal

It’s the second time BSRE’s plan was determined to not conform to county rules. But the saga isn’t over yet.

EVERETT — A plan to build a high-rise condo development at Point Wells has once again been rejected by the Snohomish County hearing examiner, who ruled on Friday that the decade-old proposal still fails to meet legal requirements.

Hearing Examiner Peter Camp gave county planning officials permission to deny the proposal “because of substantial conflicts with county code,” including buildings that would be too tall and too close to landslide hazard areas.

Instead of redesigning earlier plans to comply with the code, developer BSRE Point Wells sought exceptions to the rules it would break by building some 3,000 condos on an industrial site between Puget Sound and a steep hillside near Woodway. Yet the developer failed to prove there were special circumstances that qualified the plan for those exceptions, Camp decided.

Released just before 5:45 p.m. on Friday, Camp’s latest decision deals yet another setback to the Point Wells project, which first crossed the desk of county planning officials in a 2011 permit application.

Some of the buildings proposed would reach heights of 180 feet, or about 17 stories, according to paperwork submitted by BSRE, an acronym for Blue Square Real Estate.

The developer’s attorneys did not respond to emails and phone calls from The Daily Herald requesting comment on the most recent ruling.

Residents and government authorities have repeatedly raised concerns about traffic, landslide risks and other issues associated with the project. They reiterated those points during a November hearing before the hearing examiner.

County Planning and Development Services department staff, too, recommended against the latest version of the plan. Camp cited many of the problems that the department highlighted during the November hearing, including discrepancies in documents submitted by the developer.

“The decision cited a number of things we pointed out, where the applicant’s plans were not internally consistent on what they were asking for,” said county planning supervisor Ryan Countryman. “That’s been part of the challenge all along.”

The project’s lead architect told the hearing examiner last fall that county planners did not offer much help when the project team was trying to navigate the permitting process. The architect, Dan Seng from the Seattle-based firm Perkins+Will, touted the benefits of the project, which would also include public beach access and space for restaurants and retailers.

Camp rejected BSRE’s argument that the planning department did not review the application in good faith.

An architectural model of the planned development of 3,080 waterfront condos at Point Wells near Woodway. (Blue Square Real Estate)

An architectural model of the planned development of 3,080 waterfront condos at Point Wells near Woodway. (Blue Square Real Estate)

“Further, BSRE’s hands are not clean,” Camp said in the 77-page ruling. “It failed to take advantage of its mulligan or do-over and did not materially change its application or submit alternatives.”

But the plan’s backers haven’t exhausted all their options to make their vision a reality. The developer, or anyone else who is party to the hearing examiner proceedings, can formally request that Camp reconsider. The deadline to do so is Feb. 8, Camp said in the ruling.

The developer can also appeal his decision to the Snohomish County Council. Such an appeal must be filed on or before Feb. 12, according to the ruling.

Then, if the council sides with the hearing examiner, the court system offers another avenue for appeal. That’s the route that BSRE took in 2018, when Camp denied an earlier version of the project.

After the County Council upheld Camp’s 2018 ruling, BSRE asked King County Superior Court to review the denial. King County Superior Court Judge John McHale gave the developer additional time to seek approval for the project.

McHale ruled that BSRE had to address the issues identified by Camp in his earlier ruling. BSRE has appealed McHale’s ruling to the state Court of Appeals, however, seeking clarification on two key county code requirements that Camp cited related to building height.

One rule requires setbacks from tall buildings to lower-density residential development.

The other rule bars buildings higher than 90 feet unless there’s a “high capacity transit route or station” nearby.

BSRE has offered to build a platform for a Sound Transit commuter rail line that travels a railroad corridor running through the site. But the developer “made no serious effort” to make the new station a reality and didn’t submit documentation to show definitively whether the transit agency supports the idea, Camp said in the ruling.

In its latest set of plans, submitted in December 2019, the developer sought variances that would grant it special permission to disregard the two building height limits.

But Camp ruled that the developer failed to prove that those variances would not harm other properties or public welfare. Some of the proposed buildings would detract from the views of properties neighboring the development, Camp said.

BSRE made a few more changes to its plan, including reducing the number of homes by about 240, outlining a four-phase development schedule and relocating some — though not all — of the proposed buildings to be outside required setback areas.

“Otherwise, the project proposal remains largely unchanged,” Camp said.

BSRE also didn’t to address questions about whether the development can safely be built in an area that’s known for being unstable.

The site overlaps with landslide hazard zones, which typically can only be developed if an applicant proves there is no alternative location for a structure on a given property. BSRE failed to provide enough evidence that buildings it planned for those hazardous areas could go nowhere else, Camp said.

Additionally, the county’s chief engineering officer has denied the developer’s request for a “deviation,” or special consent to build in those otherwise-prohibited hazard areas.

“BSRE bet entirely on its claimed right to build taller than 90 feet and its deviation request to build within the landslide hazard area and setback,” Camp said.

Rachel Riley: 425-339-3465; Twitter: @rachel_m_riley.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

A Cessna 150 crashed north of Paine Field on Friday evening, Feb. 16, 2024, in Mukilteo, Washington. The pilot survived without serious injury. (Courtesy of Richard Newman.)
Small plane lost power in crash north of Paine Field, flight club says

The pilot reportedly called 911, stuck in a tree, on Friday. The sole occupant survived “without a scratch,” the president of Puget Sound Flyers said.

The PUD Everett Substation on Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Delta residents rip PUD power line plan to cut through neighborhood

The PUD said the poles will connect two Everett power stations amid “increasing electrical demand.” Locals feel it shows a lack of “forethought.”

IonQ CEO Peter Chapman, left, and Sen. Maria Cantwell, right, cut a ribbon during an IonQ event at their research and manufacturing facility on Thursday, Feb. 15, 2024 in Bothell, Washington. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Nation’s first quantum computing manufacturing plant opens in Bothell

IonQ, a Maryland-based firm, expects to add hundreds of jobs and invest $1 billion in the region over the next 10 years.

Snohomish County Jail. (Sue Misao / Herald file)
Arlington woman arrested in 2005 case of killed baby in Arizona airport

Annie Sue Anderson, 51, has been held in the Snohomish County Jail since December. She’s facing extradition.

Ken Florczak, president of the five-member board at Sherwood Village Mobile Home community on Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024 in Mill Creek, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
How Mill Creek mobile home residents bought the land under their feet

At Sherwood Village, residents are now homeowners. They pay a bit more each month to keep developers from buying their property.

Lake Serene in Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. (U.S. Forest Service)
How will climate change affect you? New tool gives an educated guess

The Climate Vulnerability Tool outlines climate hazards in Snohomish County — and it may help direct resources.

Shirley Prouty (Submitted photo)
Shirley Prouty, Arlington historian and grandma to all, dies at 92

Prouty chronicled “100 Years of Arlington” in a series of books. “She’d turn over any rock,” a former mayor said.

Arlington man suspected of DUI in fatal I-5 crash

Police said the man was driving the wrong way south of Tacoma and crashed into another car. Angelica Roberto Campos, 52, later died.

Feds fine Everett test lab for alleged animal welfare violations

Altasciences was cited for five alleged violations in the last two years that resulted in animal injuries and deaths.

Librarian Andrea Wallis leads activities during Toddler Storytime at the Main Everett Library on Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Everett library trustees ‘ideally’ don’t want to merge with Sno-Isle

City finance staff see three options to deal with a $12.9 million deficit: a library merger, a fire department merger, or a new property tax.

A student reaches put their hands to feel raindrops as it begins to pour on Monday, Jan. 22, 2024 in Camano Island, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
‘Hollow gestures’ won’t allow Camano forest school to survive, founders say

Island County officials acknowledged they should have given Springwood Forest School families more time to prepare for an impending closure.

Logo for news use featuring Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Driver killed in crash east of Snohomish

The man crashed off the road Monday morning in the Three Lakes area. Nobody else was injured.