ST. PAUL, Minn. – A high school senior whose SAT was incorrectly scored low is suing the board that oversees the exam and the testing company that was hired.
The lawsuit, filed late Friday in Minnesota, is the first since last month’s announcement that 4,411 students got incorrectly low scores and that more than 600 had better results than they deserved on the October test.
It names the nonprofit College Board and the for-profit Pearson Educational Measurement, which has offices in Minnesota’s Hennepin County.
“Any type of a high-stakes test that impacts a life event like college, scholarships and financial aid has to be scored with 100 percent accuracy,” St. Paul attorney Joseph Snodgrass said Saturday. “There is no room for error in this type of a situation.”
The lawsuit, filed by attorneys for an unidentified high school senior in Dix Hills, N.Y., seeks class action status. Lawyers want to allow anyone who took the test in October except those who got a marked-up score to join the lawsuit.
The suit also seeks unspecified damages, an order requiring adjustment of the inflated scores and a refund of the test fee.
Test takers who were scored too low had their results corrected, but the College Board has declined to fix the inflated scores. That has angered some college officials, who say they could unfairly influence admissions and scholarship decisions.
The SAT is taken by more than 2 million students and used by most colleges as a factor in admissions. The 2,400-point exam measures reasoning skills in reading, writing and math.
The October test was taken by nearly 500,000 students, so the error affected less than 1 percent of the results. The College Board maintains most were off by 100 points or less, although some students saw much wider swings.
Pearson said the culprit may have been excessive moisture that caused answer sheets to expand and some marks to be unreadable. The error was discovered when the College Board asked the company to hand-score some tests.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
