Comment: Wildfire problem is matter of fuel load, not climate

By limiting the harvest of timber in the state we allowed the forests’ fuel load to grow; and then burn.

By Don Healy / For The Herald

As the old adage goes, “when you have a hammer in your hand, everything looks like a nail.”

For some in the climate community, any change that occurs in the environment can be blamed on climate change. An example of this is the Feb. 3 commentary in the Weekend Herald, “Fossil fuels throwing gas on wildfires,” by Paul Roberts. Roberts overlooks the major factor, fuel load, concerning the increase in acres burned in recent decades, to focus on a relatively minor factor, a slight increase in temperature due to an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide.

The 900-pound gorilla in the room is the dramatic increase in our nation’s wildlands fuel load. The U.S. Forest Service’s inventory figures the volume of merchantable-sized timber in the nation has increased by 60 percent from 1953 to 2017, and it is very probable that smaller tree sizes, grasses and shrubs have grown at an even more rapid pace. With the spotted owl controversy and similar environmental actions starting in the late 1970s, harvesting and thinning on our national forestlands has essentially halted. The trees and other vegetation, however, did not get the message and kept growing.

When logging first commenced in this region, in the virgin forest on the Olympic Peninsula in the mid to late 1800s and the areas on the east side of Puget Sound, starting around 1900, the fuel loads were much, much higher than today, and forest fires were much more common and burned much larger areas. Roberts is correct when he states, “Wildfires and associated smoke are now routine signs of summer in the western U.S. California has seen eight of its ten largest wildfires and six of the most destructive since 2017.”

However, if we check the data compiled by the U.S. Interagency Fire Agency, we find that in the decade starting in 1926, acreage burned in the U.S. were up to 5 times greater than anything we have experienced in the period cited by Roberts. As my professor told his forest protection class, the three most important factors concerning forest fires are “fuel load, fuel load and fuel load, in that order” and by what has happened, he was correct. The anecdotal record reveals that smoke from fires was very common and very heavy most summers but was viewed as the price of progress.

Roberts’ solution to reduce the use of fossil fuels to solve the wildfire problem is idealistic, and unfortunately not acceptable to much of the world’s population that is energy deprived, notably China, India and Indonesia. The United Nations has been holding its COP meetings to come to agreements on greenhouse gas reductions since 1995 without achieving much in the way of concrete results.

So realistically, we will see no meaningful reduction in atmospheric carbon levels in most of our lifetimes. However, if we are serious about reducing the risk of wildfires, we, on our own as a nation could move very rapidly. By implementing commercial and non-commercial thinning operations where needed on federal and state lands and by sponsoring and encouraging the reestablishment of a modest forest products industry we could greatly improve the fire resistance of our nations forest and at the same create jobs and improve the health of our forests. In 2020, the U.S. imported $44.58 billion worth of wood products while we let our forest burns and did nothing to ameliorate the situation.

An additional benefit, one that Roberts as a past school board member might appreciate, is the boon this would be to our country’s public schools. By federal law, 25 percent of the gross proceeds of sales of products from federal lands goes to local counties for schools, roads and other local needs. This used to be a significant portion of public-school funding.

Ironically, Roberts is correct that burning fossils does have an impact on the fire situation in that the resulting increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide triggers the fertilization effect causing the plant community to grow more rapidly while at the same time making plants more drought tolerant. This has been very beneficial in increasing crop production, but also further exacerbates the fuel load problem in our nation’s forests.

The wildfire situation is a crucial issue that needs to be addressed. If we don’t, we will be revisiting the smoke and wildfire conditions that we experienced in the 1920s. I would suggest that we focus on the crux of the wildfire issue, fuel load, which we have the capability to address, and on which we can take timely action.

Don Healy holds a bachelor’s degree in forest management, earned in 1968 from Oregon State University.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Trump can go only as far as the courts will allow

Most of Trump’s executive orders are likely to face court challenges, setting the limits of presidential power.

Comment: Civil service needs reform; Trump means only to gut it

It’s too difficult to hire and fire federal workers. A grand bargain is possible, but that’s not what Trump seeks.

Saunders: U.S. Iron Dome isn’t feasible now, but it could be

Trump is correct to order a plan for a system that would protect the nation from missile strikes.

Harrop: Trump has no sense of damage from tariff threats

Even if ultimately averted, a trade war with Canada and Mexico could drive both from U.S. exports.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

A young man carries water past the destroyed buildings of a neighborhood in the Gaza Strip, Feb. 2, 2025. President Donald Trump’s proposal to “own” the Gaza Strip and transfer its population elsewhere has stirred condemnation and sarcasm, but it addresses a real and serious challenge: the future of Gaza as a secure, peaceful, even prosperous place. (Saher Alghorra/The New York Times)
Comment: ‘Homeland’ means exactly that to Gazans

Palestinians have long resisted resettlement. Trump’s plan to ‘clean out’ Gaza changes nothing.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rent stabilization can keep more from losing homes

Thank you to The Herald Editorial Board for its editorial, regarding rent… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.