Harrop: Debate remains around legalized abortion and crime

More study will be needed to determine how abortion, poverty, race and crime interact.

By Froma Harrop / Creators.com

Growing restrictions on the right to an abortion have revived talk of what many still regard as a highly controversial theory. It holds that the legalization of abortion in 1973 reduced the number of unwanted children, who might have been at higher risk of committing serious crimes. And that explained the sharp drop in the crime rate that started in the early 1990s.

This theory, which rubbed many nerves raw as racist, occupied a chapter in “Freakonomics,” a 2005 bestseller. “There is a long lag between abortions being performed and the affected cohort reaching the age at which crime is committed,” one of the authors, University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt, recently wrote in the Economist. “It is rare — almost unprecedented — in academic economics to be able to make a testable prediction and then to go back and actually test it decades later.”

Because young people who commit the crimes were disproportionately Black, arguing that abortion would lead to a reduced criminal population might have sounded intended to reduce the Black population. The counterargument, however, could be that the victims of murder were also disproportionately Black.

The former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan jumped on the racial implications in crime statistics. “White people kill other white people at almost the same rate black people kill other black people,” he tweeted, “& yet you never hear anyone complaining about ‘white on white crime.’”

Hasan seemed to confuse numbers with rates. Although the number of white-on-white homicides about equaled Black-on-Black homicides in 2019, whites made up about 60 percent of the total population, while Blacks represented only about 12 percent. Thus, the per capita murder rate was much higher among the Black-on-Black contingent.

“Pro-life” groups have long made the case that abortion is itself racist. They cite eugenicists from early last century who pushed all forms of birth control as a means to target “inferior races.” White women currently account for about 39 percent of abortions in this country, while Black women account for about 28 percent, according to the Guttmacher Institute, which collects such data. Perhaps the more relevant statistic is this one: 75 percent of women who obtain abortions are low-income.

The Economist didn’t and still does not like the “Freakonomics” theory. It noted other explanations for the drop in homicides. “No-fault divorce, rather than legalized abortion, may have played a bigger role,” it said unconvincingly.

A more plausible counterargument might be that increased incarceration and improved policing, as well as more police, accounted for much of the falling crime rates. Levitt questioned whether that conclusion was being pushed by “those whose livelihoods came from fighting crime.”

A personal observation: Back in the very bad-old-days of urban crime, I lived in a mostly poor neighborhood mostly occupied by people of color. I recall a 7-year-old girl playing in a park behind my building getting killed in the crossfire of gang warfare. It was at dusk when white grown-ups like me avoided the park, but where were little kids supposed to play before going home for dinner?

We are urged to remember the names of young Black people killed by police, and that is fine. But what about that 7-year-old? Try as I might, I couldn’t find reference to her name. She rightfully could have had a family of her own by now. The remaining members of her family must be traumatized to this day.

Because of the racial implications, the Freakonomics abortion theory must be treated with care. But look at the life stories of the most vicious criminals, whites included, and you see major dysfunction made worse by poverty. The abortion discussion should rightfully go beyond a woman’s right to control her body.

Follow Froma Harrop on X @FromaHarrop. Email at fharrop@gmail.com. Copyright 2024, Creators.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Snohomish County Councilmembers Nate Nehring, left, and Jared Mead, speaking, take turns moderating a panel including Tulip Tribes Chairwoman Teri Gobin, Stanwood Mayor Sid Roberts and Lynnwood Mayor Christine Frizzell during the Building Bridges Summit on Monday, Dec. 4, 2023, at Western Washington University Everett in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Candidates, voters have campaign promises to make

Two county officials’ efforts to improve political discourse skills are expanding to youths and adults.

Charles Blow: Trump remains at war with the U.S. Constitution

His threats of deportation and violence against peaceful protesters, though vague, can’t be ignored.

Choice in November is between democracy, autocracy

The country belongs to the people and in November they can choose… Continue reading

Opposing Israel’s Netanyahu isn’t antisemitic

I support the demonstrations against Israel’s Benjamin Netayahu. Counter to what the… Continue reading

Trump is being pursued in court because he can win

It is so obvious that President Biden, the Democrats and much of… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Attorney General Bob Ferguson speaks to a reporter as his 2024 gubernatorial campaign launch event gets underway in Seattle, on Saturday, Sept. 9, 2023. ( Jerry Cornfield/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Recruiting two Bob Fergusons isn’t election integrity

A GOP activist paid the filing fee for two gubernatorial candidates who share the attorney general’s name.

Foster parent abstract concept vector illustration. Foster care, father in adoption, happy interracial family, having fun, together at home, childless couple, adopted child abstract metaphor.
Editorial: State must return foster youths’ federal benefits

States, including Washington, have used those benefits, rather than hold them until adulthood.

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Social Security’s good news? Bad news delayed a bit

Congress has a little additional time to make sure Social Security is solvent. It shouldn’t waste it.

Eco-nomics: What it takes to take carbon out of energy

The transition to clean energy demands investment in R&D and the grid and streamlining processes.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.