It’s been interesting to see the letters and passionate positions regarding I-594. I was hoping The Herald would print the proposed law, in type large enough for all to read. As we know, the sad truth is that most voters respond to commercials, social media and pop culture icons.
Here’s my 2 cents worth. I am for background checks, and mental health histories of gun buyers. It makes sense.
What doesn’t make sense is the “rush to action” hype that would allow this version to be passed.
Why not accept the fact that this proposal contains gross imperfections as written? Rewrite it to allow people to pursue their family tradition and sport. We do not go to “approved gun ranges.” We will not go to “approved gun ranges.”
We prefer locations that are legal, yet not filled with time limits, additional costs, newbies and some weirdos as found at many ranges. We make a day out of it. Friends, family, food, outdoor air, privacy, shelter and shooting. Even the “pro” side has to acknowledge the limitations that are impractical, unenforceable and unfair.
Let’s not waste more time by passing this version, the ensuing court battles which will cost all of us millions of dollars and be stricken based on so many flaws that are contained in it. Let’s get both sides together, to iron it out and pass it. This divisive issue is easy to solve. Vote no on this one, vote yes on a better written version that will succeed in its intent, keeping guns away from dangerous people and those not allowed to own them.
Tim O’Neill
Everett
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
