Gas taxes won’t be enough to fix traffic infrastructure

As political philosophy, “we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it” leads to kick-the-can government. When passive politicians postpone critical decisions, problems fester, sometimes with deadly consequences. Since the I-35W bridge dropped into the Mississippi River in Minneapolis, the saying has a new, literal meaning. Now, when we reach the bridge, we think twice about crossing.

We’ve rediscovered the lamentable condition of the national transportation system. Currently, bridges have the spotlight. In Congress, the folks who always call for higher taxes push for a nickel gas tax hike to fix them. The White House demands smarter spending. And so the D.C. debate reprises refrains familiar in Olympia.

I’d bet against a federal gas tax hike. It looks more opportunistic than heroic. Congress has made the transportation budget a rolling pork trough. Promises to spend the next nickel smarter are not persuasive.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren, senior fellows at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in D.C., argue that it’s time to abolish state and federal gas taxes, not increase them. When used for construction and maintenance, they say, gas taxes “overcharge motorists in low-maintenance, low-construction locations and undercharge those in high-maintenance, high-growth areas. When addressing pollution … they overcharge rural motorists and undercharge many urban motorists. When addressing congestion, they overcharge non-peak road users and undercharge peak road use.”

They contend, convincingly, that the gas tax is a clumsy, “second-best remedy” to an array of environmental and transportation problems that would be better addressed by specific pollution taxes and road-use fees.

Taylor told me he “doesn’t see any need for the state gas tax,” but finds it preferable to the federal one. Still, he acknowledges there’s “zero chance” politicians will soon cut fuel taxes.

Practical politics aside, however, Taylor and Van Doren are on the right track. Over time, the gas tax will fade dramatically in importance. It’s best now to begin planning for its demise.

Robert Poole, director of transportation studies for the free-market Reason Foundation, is one of the nation’s leading transportation authorities.

A strong advocate of user fees, Poole says, “The gas tax does not seem like a good long-term bet.” Increased fuel efficiency and a possible change in how we power cars and trucks hasten its decline. “But definitely it’s the mainstay for the next 15 years.”

That’s how long it’s going to take to develop viable alternatives. For example, while the technology for tracking vehicle miles traveled – perhaps the best way to tax road use – exists, it’s not widely installed. Poole says for such a system to work, “the feds will have to mandate a GPS box for all new vehicles.” And then give it 15-20 years before everyone has one. (I worry about privacy considerations, but those of us who carry cell phones have probably already lost that battle.)

Meanwhile, we’ll be relying on the gas tax.

“There really isn’t anything that can generate that kind of revenue capacity,” he tells me. But it’s not enough.

Poole favors “limited access” projects that add road capacity for a fee. He cites Georgia, Texas, Virginia, and Florida as examples of states that have pioneered successful programs with the private sector financing, operating, and building toll roads. Because of outmoded formulas for distributing federal highway dollars, these rapidly growing states usually send more money to D.C. than they get back. So they’ve taken the initiative.

In addition, Poole condemns “the uncontrollable growth of earmarks, which fund low priority projects at the expense of the high priority projects that states would prefer to fund.” The combination short-changes essential projects in favor of bridges to nowhere.

Despite steep increases in the state gas tax, our transportation system requires substantial new capital. Spokane’s north-south corridor, Seattle’s Alaskan Way Viaduct, a new 520 bridge: All remain underfunded. Having reached the point of diminishing returns with the gas tax, we’re going to have to accept a transportation future that relies heavily on user fees, tracking devices, restricted lanes and private sector investment – whatever it takes to get the job done.

Before we can cross the bridge to improved safety and mobility, we’ll need to build it ourselves. And pay the toll.

Richard S. Davis, vice president-communications of the Association of Washington Business, writes every other Wednesday. His columns do not necessarily reflect the views of AWB. Write Davis at richardd@awb.org or Association of Washington Business, P.O. Box 658, 1414 Cherry Street SE, Olympia, WA 98507-0658.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, June 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

AP government students at Henry M. Jackson High School visited the state Capitol this spring and watched as a resolution they helped draft was adopted in the Senate as part of the Building Bridges Future Leaders Academy. (Josh Estes / Building Bridges)
Comment: Future leaders learn engineering of building bridges

Here’s what Jackson High government students learned with the help of local officials and lawmakers.

Comment: Early cancer diagnosis can be key in saving lives

An act in Congress would allow Medicare coverage for early-detection tests for a range of cancers.

Comment: In wildfire crisis, options for forests, communities

By thinning threatened forests, mass timber can use that material for homes, businesses and more.

Forum: Everett’s land-use plan should keep affordable housing tool

Its comprehensive plan should keep inclusionary zoning, setting aside housing for working families.

Forum: Advice to young adults, focus on your best ‘person’

Past generations focused on the character aspects of gender roles, but something more basic is necessary.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, June 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

In a gathering similar to many others across the nation on Presidents Day, hundreds lined Broadway with their signs and chants to protest the Trump administration Monday evening in Everett. (Aaron Kennedy / Daily Herald)
Editorial: Let’s remember the ‘peaceably’ part of First Amendment

Most of us understand the responsibilities of free speech; here’s how we remind President Trump.

The Buzz: ‘Your majesty, the peasants are revolting!’

Well, that’s a little harsh, but we’re sure the ‘No Kings’ protesters clean up well after their marches.

Schwab: Why keep up nonviolent protests? Because they work

Our greatest democratic victories came on the heels of massive, nationwide demonstrations.

Bouie: Trump’s weaknesses show through theater of strength

His inability to calmly confront opposition and respond with force betrays brittleness and insecurity.

Add your voice to protect freedoms at No Kings Day protests

Imagine it’s 2045. Nationwide, women have been fully stripped of rights to… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.