McArdle: Impeachment may be right thing, but it won’t be easy

It will take resounding public opinion to move Republicans to accept the duty of pushing Trump out.

By Megan McArdle / The Washington Post

Many people who would rejoice to see the last of President Trump nonetheless fear that impeaching him is a bad idea. The country, after all, is headed into an election year, and voters will soon have the opportunity to sort this matter out for themselves. If Trump survives impeachment, then the 2020 election will be focused on Trump’s flexible-to-the-point-of-dislocation moral standards rather than on policy, where the president is especially weak. And any attempt to impeach him is all too likely to damage former vice president Joe Biden, his most viable opponent. Trying to remove Trump may perversely make him more likely to be reelected.

For centrist conservatives who might be impeachment-friendly, it poses another, special danger: that conservative voters will rally to his side, cementing the man’s control of the rubble-strewn territory where they’d hoped to rebuild their beloved movement. The fear is reinforced by the sense among many of them that impeachment cannot work, that this will end with Republican senators professing even more slavishly loyalty to His Mighty Orangeness.

But even among conservative politicians, most of Trump’s support comes from people who are afraid of him but not enamored.

Which means that if public opinion turns in favor of impeachment, the Republican senators currently muttering “Nothing to see here, move along” may easily find their “questions” about his “troubling” behavior easily ripening into a firm belief that the president needs to go. Trump will have no party loyalty or longstanding relationships to fall back on; if voters are on board, Republicans will defenestrate Trump with great speed and greater joy.

For that to happen, though, a clear majority of the public must back impeachment. Not a mere plurality, or even a slim majority, but somewhere north of 60 percent of Americans saying they want the president removed. That would spare GOP senators the difficult choice between conscience and political expedience: A pro-impeachment majority that large would mean losing not only the presidency but also the seats of many senators who voted to keep Trump in office.

The polls are already moving in that direction, though not by anywhere near enough to budge Senate Republicans. Mostly it’s still Democrats who always wanted to impeach Trump; though only if their party could get away with it. But a growing number of independents and even some Republicans are leaning that way.

Now that a previously stable consensus is changing, it may change fast. We like to think that we form our beliefs based purely on facts and reason, but in truth they are shaped by what it is acceptable for “people like me” to believe. If a few bellwether “people like me” change their minds, the unthinkable can quickly become the inevitable.

That outcome isn’t necessarily the most likely one. Pro-impeachment public opinion is still a long way from polling in the 60s, and may never get there. Even if it does, legitimate questions would remain about whether it’s best for the country to let an election year be dominated by an impeachment, especially when Democrats’ determination to impeach the president was clear long before the pretext for doing so arrived.

Those questions will be especially difficult for Republicans because, as writer Jonathan V. Last has pointed out, Trump won’t slink off like President Nixon if the party says it’s time to go. Trump couldn’t care less about the GOP, except as a vehicle for his own aggrandizement. Moreover, the high point of his presidency, which won him genuine plaudits even from conservatives who openly revile him, was his decision to stick with Brett Kavanaugh when everyone else was saying it was obvious his Supreme Court nomination would have to be withdrawn. You can be sure that Trump took a lesson from that: Don’t listen to the political strategists, and definitely don’t surrender, no matter how bad it looks.

For Trump to be removed, then, it won’t be enough for his party’s leaders to decide that they’d be better off without him. A large majority of the public will have to decide that they can’t stand another minute of him — and then GOP leaders will have to go to war with their own president, who will hunker down in the Oval Office with his shrinking band of supporters.

Contra the naysayers, I think it’s possible this will happen. I think it might be better for the country, and even the Republican Party, if it did. But I do agree with them on one point: It sure won’t be easy.

Follow Megan McArdle on Twitter @asymmetricinfo.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Payton Pavon-Garrido, 23, left, and Laura Castaneda, 28, right, push the ballots into the ballot drop box next to the Snohomish County Auditor’s Office on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Oppose efforts to deny eligible voters their right

The SAVE Act in Congress and a lawsuit against states intend to disenfranchise eligible voters.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Letter: Regulation could limit supply of rental homes

With efforts to limit ownership of single-family homes now drawing attention at… Continue reading

Letter: Student protests offer lessons in nonviolence

Thanks to The Herald for impartially reporting the latest interactions between student… Continue reading

Dowd: High court at last schools Trump on checks and balances

Not that he took it well, but the Supreme Court has provided some accountability from the executive.

Bouie: Marco Rubio is failing his Western Civ course

His thoughts on Western civilization in Munich sound more like those of European feudal lords and Confederate apologists.

Comment: Why would Trump want to sell tiny cars to Americans?

Trump is enamoured with Japan’s ‘kei’ cars. But would SUV-loving Americans be interested?

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: Find respectful policy on tariffs, trade with Canada

Washington state depends on trade with Canada. The Trump administration’s belligerence is harmful.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Supreme Court finds its voice to hold Trump in check

The Roberts Court’s tariff decision flatly tells Trump he can’t always do what he believes he can.

Comment: Here’s how to prevent abuses at DOJ once Trump is gone

Congress must put reforms in place to prevent the political retribution and favoritism running rampant.

Comment: ICE”s exit alone won’t heal trauma inflicted on Minneapolis

Over time, neighbors reaching out can salve the fear and intimidation that plagued the Minnesota city.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.