IRS probe of social welfare groups sparks debate

WASHINGTON — A long-simmering battle over whether the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny with political intentions has heated up again in Congress.

A House hearing erupted into shouts of frustration and recrimination Wednesday in a scene reminiscent of the early days of the probe into the IRS activities.

There again was Lois Lerner, the former IRS official who last year invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, declining once more to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

On Wednesday, Lerner again invoked the Fifth Amendment, ending days of speculation over whether she would testify after being subpoenaed.

The shouting began as a clearly frustrated Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the committee chairman, adjourned the hearing and the equally annoyed ranking Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, objected.

“Mr. Chairman, you cannot run a committee like this,” Cummings said.

After his microphone was cut off, Cummings angrily shouted: “I am a member of the Congress of the United States of America. I am tired of this.”

He also described Issa’s investigation into the IRS matter as “one-sided” and “absolutely un-American.”

“We had a hearing,” Issa replied. “It was adjourned. I gave you an opportunity to ask your questions. You had no questions.”

And so it goes, a fight that for some observers feels never-ending, and makes the political battles over an alleged Benghazi coverup look tame by comparison.

After lawmakers spent months last year lobbing charges and countercharges, the IRS controversy appeared to quiet down.

But what, on some days, had seemed more like a political food fight than a focused bipartisan probe is blowing up again, this time with two pivotal factors looming. In addition to the approaching midterm elections, there is the controversy over a Treasury Department proposal to restrict the political activities of nonprofit groups with 501 (c)(4) tax status, or so-called social welfare organizations.

Count on both of those dynamics — not to mention any valid evidence that emerges on either side of the debate — to keep the IRS issue front and center.

Social-welfare organizations have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into election-related ads since the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which said the government cannot restrict independent political expenditures from certain types of groups.

The IRS has said its problems partly stemmed from being overwhelmed by applications from such groups and a lack of clarity on how to deal with them.

Republicans, though they have not proven a political connection to the White House, have said the IRS scrutiny was an attempt by the Obama administration to silence conservative critics.

Democrats have said the problems were nothing more than hapless bureaucratic fumbling and missteps. They have also uncovered evidence that progressive groups were targeted for intense scrutiny.

Now the Treasury’s proposed rules have caused a firestorm of their own. The draft guidelines would define a set of “campaign-related political activities” that could disqualify groups from tax-exempt status, but the draft rules place voter-registration and get-out-the-vote efforts into that category.

Those rules represent one of the few areas of common ground in this episode: Conservatives and liberals alike have said the plan goes too far, arguing that it could hinder free speech. The GOP-controlled House last week passed legislation that would block the proposed guidelines from taking effect.

Democrats are more intent on tweaking the planned changes than scrapping them. Last week, hours before a midnight deadline for public comment on the draft proposal — there were more than a 122,000 submissions at the time — a dozen Democratic senators recommended limiting the political activities of nonprofits to between 5 and 15 percent of their overall efforts. IRS guidelines say the groups must be “primarily” involved in social welfare, suggesting they can participate in some level of electioneering.

The lawmakers also said in their letter that the definition of political activity should exclude voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, but they argued that the free-speech concerns lack merit, saying “these rules would not restrict anyone’s right to speak, or to spend money to influence elections.”

The scandal has its roots in a report from Treasury inspector general J. Russell George that said the IRS had targeted nonprofit advocacy groups. Lerner had foreshadowed the findings days before the report’s release when she apologized at a legal conference for the agency’s “absolutely inappropriate” actions toward groups with terms such as “tea party” and “patriot” in their names.

Republicans pounced, suggesting the IRS actions were part of an administration plot to silence President Barack Obama’s critics. Their investigations through at least three committees have focused largely on proving their suspicions. Issa’s panel alone has held five hearings and interviewed nearly three dozen IRS officials.

The IRS has said its handed over to Congress more than 500,000 pages of documents.

Democrats contend that their GOP colleagues are pushing a false conspiracy theory based on cherry-picked facts. They stepped up their counter campaign last month,questioning George’s independence.

Reps. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., and Matt Cartwright, D-Pa., have asked a special watchdog to investigate whether George handled the probe fairly, suggesting the review focused too much on an IRS “be on the lookout” list that targeted exclusively right-leaning groups, while ignoring older lists that contained some terms associated with progressives.

George defended his audit, telling The Washington Post, “We noted there were other ‘be on the lookout’ lists that included other types of organizations, but that was not the initial charge of the review and not the focus.”

Republicans have shifted the focus back to the administration, questioning its placement of an Obama campaign donor to help lead a Justice Department investigation into the targeting matter.

The inspector general’s review and the Obama administration may both deserve further examination, but lawmakers, Republicans and Democrats alike, have muddied the investigations with efforts to score political points.

Where it will all end is unknown.

After Lerner invoked the Fifth on Wednesday, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said she should be held in contempt — a move that would intensify the controversy.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

Logo for news use featuring Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
DNR transfers land to Stillaguamish Tribe for salmon restoration

The transfer includes three state land trust parcels along the Stillaguamish River totaling just under 70 acres.

Everett women steal $2.5K of merchandise, including quinceanera dress, police say

The boutique owner’s daughter reported the four females restrained her and hit her with their car while fleeing.

Law enforcement in Snohomish County continues to seek balance for pursuits

After adjustments from state lawmakers, police say the practice often works as it should. Critics aren’t so sure

Eagle Scout project connects people with deceased loved ones

Michael Powers, 15, built a wind phone in Arlington’s Country Charm Park for those who are grieving.

Logo for news use featuring Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Snohomish County Council approves North Lake annexation agreement

Residents of the North Ridge neighborhood wanted to be removed from the urban growth area.

Two troopers place a photo of slain Washington State Patrol trooper Chris Gadd outside district headquarters about 12 hours after Gadd was struck and killed in a crash on southbound I-5 on March 2 in Marysville. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
One More Stop targets drunk driving this weekend in honor of fallen trooper

Troopers across multiple states will be patrolling from 4 p.m. Friday to 5 a.m. Monday.

The Sana Biotechnology building on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2025 in Bothell, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Bothell loses planned biotechnology manufacturing plant

New biotechnology manufacturing jobs in Bothell are on indefinite hold.

Students walk outside of Everett High School on Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
SnoCo students perform well on metrics, state data shows

At many school districts across the county, more students are meeting or exceeding grade-level standards compared to the state average.

Customers walk in and out of Fred Meyer along Evergreen Way on Monday, Oct. 31, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Everett council rebukes Kroger for plans to close Fred Meyer store

In the resolution approved by 6-1 vote, the Everett City Council referred to store closure as “corporate neglect.”

Logo for news use featuring the Tulalip Indian Reservation in Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Totem Beach Road to be transferred to Tulalip

Discussions began in 2024, and the Snohomish County Council voted Wednesday to approve the agreement.

The inside of Johnson’s full-size B-17 cockpit he is building on Sept. 23, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Everett man builds B-17 replica in his garage

Thatcher Johnson spent 3 years meticulously recreating the cockpit of a World War II bomber.

Man accused of stomping an Everett woman to death pleads guilty

In 2023, the state Court of Appeals overturned Jamel Alexander’s first-degree murder conviction. On Tuesday, he pleaded guilty to second-degree murder.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.