Comment: Cowed by Trump, congressional Republicans abdicate

A few have expressed opposition to Medicaid cuts and other moves, yet wouldn’t stand their ground on votes.

By Carl P. Leubsdorf / The Dallas Morning News

The first six months of President Donald Trump’s second administration have brought an unprecedented expansion of presidential power. They’ve also brought an unprecedented abdication of congressional authority.

Fearful of incurring Trump’s wrath — and perhaps primary opposition — Republican lawmakers have voted to confirm unqualified nominees, and rubber-stamped Medicaid cuts they acknowledged would hurt their constituents, often after proclaiming publicly they would never do so.

Oversight committees, which are supposed to police the executive branch’s management of legislation, are ignoring the administration’s unconstitutional dismantling of statutory agencies and programs; and complaining about the federal judges who are seeking to protect them.

Some members who represent swing districts or states with thousands of Medicaid recipients may face the wrath of voters next year. All of them should.

There’s no question which member of Congress put on the year’s most hypocritical legislative performance.

Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri spent two months righteously condemning pending GOP proposals to cut Medicaid, noting it serves more than one million Missourians. For Republicans “to build our ‘big, beautiful bill’ around slashing health insurance for the working poor,” he wrote in The New York Times, “is both morally wrong and politically suicidal.”

He then voted for it, citing a modest addition funding rural hospitals. Then, he introduced a bill to repeal some of the Medicaid cuts, an empty gesture destined never to see the light of day; or the Senate calendar.

Hawley was not the only GOP senator casting a damaging vote while expressing reservations. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, gained some concessions for her constituents, then voted for the Trump package while expressing doubts about what she was doing.

“While we have worked to improve the present bill for Alaska,” she said, “it is not good enough for the rest of our nation; and we all know it.”

To be clear: the Senate would have rejected it had either Hawley or Murkowski voted on their stated principles.

There was even less GOP resistance when the administration asked Congress to cancel $9 billion it had previously voted for, most for health and food aid to poor countries, about $1 billion for public radio and television.

Though the cuts will shut small public radio outlets in many states, most Republican senators kept silent as Democrats denounced their impact. Only two, Maine’s Susan Collins and Murkowski, opposed the measure, safe votes since the administration had enough support without them.

The Senate’s hypocrisy was matched in the House.

Sixteen Republicans vowed resistance to the Medicaid cuts drafted by the House Budget Committee.

“Protecting Medicaid is essential for the vulnerable constituents we were elected to represent,” they wrote GOP leaders. “Therefore, we cannot support a final bill that threatens access to coverage or jeopardizes the stability of our hospitals and providers.”

Signatories were Reps. David Valadao and Young Kim, Calif.; Juan Ciscomani, Ariz.; Rob Bresnahan Jr., Pa.; Chuck Edwards, N.C.; Andrew Garbarino, Michael Lawler and Nicole Malliotakis, N.Y.; Jen Kiggans and Robert Wittman, Va.; Jefferson Van Drew, N.J.; Don Bacon, Neb.; Dan Newhouse, Wash.; Zach Nunn and Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Iowa.; and Jeff Hurd, Col.

But all 16 subsequently backed it after gaining an increase in the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction, which benefits mainly middle- and upper-income taxpayers. All 16 later acquiesced in even more sweeping Medicaid cuts added by the Senate.

Legislative issues were not the only places where GOP senators abandoned stated principles amid administration pressure.

Sens. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Joni Ernst of Iowa cast the decisive votes to confirm the two most manifestly unqualified Trump Cabinet secretaries after obtaining promises the two nominees abandoned once approved.

Cassidy said Secretary of Health and Services-nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr., if confirmed, “will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ recommendations without changes.”

Soon after taking office, Kennedy removed all 17 panel members, replacing some with outspoken critics of government-mandated immunization for the nation’s children.

Ernst expressed concern about Secretary of Defense-nominee Pete Hegseth’s stated opposition to women in combat roles and sought a commitment to having a senior-level military official dedicated to sexual assault response and prevention.

“Women will have access to ground-combat roles, given the standards remain high,” Hegseth testified. While he has not reversed the Obama administration’s decision placing women in combat roles, he announced a review of physical fitness standards that could have that effect.

Hegseth has not yet announced an official to monitor sexual assault issues, but he has continued his purge of high-level women officers, most recently removing the U.S. Naval Academy’s first female superintendent.

Both Cassidy and Ernst face re-election races in 2026, and both feared Trump-endorsed primary challenges.

In fact, some Trump supporters sought to pressure Ernst before she backed Hegseth; including a column by a potential primary foe, Iowa state Attorney General Brenda Bird.

GOP-led congressional committees have been no better.

The principal House investigative committee, which spent the last two years unsuccessfully trying to find a way to impeach Joe Biden, has switched its focus to whether the former president’s declining health led aides to exercise his duties, despite the lack of evidence they did.

Rather than probe the current administration’s manifest irregularities, they’re investigating hearsay about the prior one.

One thing the past six months have shown is that, when casting votes or confirming nominees, there is little difference between so-called “conservative” Republicans and so-called “moderate” ones.

When it comes to backing Trump, they are all on board.

Carl P. Leubsdorf is the former Washington bureau chief of the Dallas Morning News. Email him at carl.p.leubsdorf@gmail.com. ©2025 The Dallas Morning News. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE — COVID19 vaccines are prepared by a nurse in a mobile vaccine clinic at a senior living facility in McMinnville, Ore., Oct. 6, 2021. A dozen public health experts, along with seven former high-ranking officials, are describing the CDC under the leadership of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as badly wounded and fast losing its legitimacy, portending harsh consequences for public health. (Alisha Jucevic/The New York Times)
Editorial: Western states take only course on vaccine access

The move assures access to covid vaccines but can’t replace a national policy vital to public health.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Sept. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: State agency’s cut would limit access to dialysis

The Health Care Authority is cutting Medicare reimbursement for kidney dialysis, affecting patients and costs.

Comment: Sound Transit $35B cost overrun calls for state audit

The cost for ST3 exceeds current and future taxpayers’ ability to fund the three-county system.

Sports Dad: The smallest things keep a rec league coach going

It’s goofy team names and little personal victories and parents who care enough to get kids on the field.

Mason Rutledge
Forum: Agree or not with Charlie Kirk, he fed need for discourse

Regardless of where we stand on issues, we have to find a path toward discussion and understanding.

The Buzz: What Charlie Kirk got right about our rights

Freedom of speech was just that to the conservative activist. He invited a sharing of perspectives. Here’s ours:

Comment: Cash grants do help children and families in poverty

A recent study, misinterpreted by many, does not argue against providing aid for low-income families.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

An image taken from a website attack advertisement targeting Everett school board member Anna Marie Jackson Laurence. (laurenceletusdown.com)
Editorial: Attack ads an undeserved slander of school official

Ads against an Everett school board candidate are a false and unfair attack on a public servant.

Pedestrians using umbrellas, some Washingtonians use them, as they cross Colby Avenue under pouring rain on Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2017 in Everett, Wa. The forecast through Saturday is cloudy with rain through Saturday. (Andy Bronson / The Herald)
Editorial: Speed limit reductions a good start on safety

Everett is reducing speed limits for two streets; more should follow to save pedestrian lives.

Gov. Bob Ferguson and Rep. Rick Larsen talk during a listening session with with community leaders and families addressing the recent spending bill U.S. Congress enacted that cut Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funding by 20% on Thursday, Aug. 21, 2025 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Work to replace what was taken from those in need

The state and local communities will have to ensure food security after federal SNAP and other cuts.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.