Heraldnet.com
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009 3:08 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Sunday
Saturday
Friday
Thursday
Wednesday
Tuesday
Monday
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Editorials   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, July 1, 2009

MUST-SEE PROCEEDINGS

Shine lights on high court

When Senate confirmation hearings on Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court begin July 13, many court watchers will be anxious to hear whether she favors televising the high court's oral arguments.

We hope she does.

Sotomayor has likely given the question some thought, since she sits on a federal judicial committee that's considering whether judges in lower courts should have the discretion to permit video cameras in the courtroom for some civil, non-jury cases.

Based on comments current Supreme Court justices have made about televising oral arguments on C-SPAN, at least some of them are deeply skeptical. None of their public comments, however, have matched the certitude of Justice David Souter's view. If a TV camera ever were allowed before the Supreme Court, he said, it would have to "roll over my dead body."

Fortunately, now that Justice Souter has retired -- Monday was his final day on the bench -- that scene can remain forever figurative.

Televising the approximately 75, one-hour oral arguments the court hears each year would cast welcome light on perhaps the most important yet least understood branch of the federal government. It could inspire countless future attorneys and judges (Sotomayor has said she was inspired in her youth by episodes of "Perry Mason").

It could also go a long way toward enhancing the public's trust and confidence in the entire judiciary. If it led to greater use of cameras in trial courts -- as long as individual judges retain the authority to shut them off when appropriate -- so much the better.

Some sitting justices worry that introducing TV cameras to their proceedings will change the dynamic of oral arguments, and might upset the court's current collegiality.

To the first concern, we doubt if justices themselves would be tempted to play to the camera, given that they already have a lifetime appointment and therefore no career incentive to do so. And attorneys arguing before the high court understand that they have to persuade the nine justices before them, not TV viewers.

As to collegiality, that gets thrown out the window in sharply-worded dissents, anyway. These are the final arbiters of the U.S. Constitution, after all, not members of the local Rotary.

Besides, our state's Supreme Court conducted its first televised proceeding -- a death penalty case -- back in 1995. TVW's regular court coverage since then hasn't turned our justices into on-air prima donnas.

The nation's judiciary shouldn't be shrouded in mystery. It's time to lift the curtains, and Sotomayor should seize this opportunity to start pulling the cords.

READER COMMENTS
Be the first to comment.
You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet.

To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click hereLog out

1. City of Everett, neighbor sued over lost trees, mudslide
2. Three-car accident closes Highway 9
3. Kennedy’s assassination remains a puzzling memory
4. Ways to Give: How you can help in your community
5. Take a look under your seat
6. Novice real estate investors can lose their shirts
7. Kwan never golden, but sometimes transcendant
8. Lotto ticket worth $6.5 million sold in Lake Stevens
9. Canceled credit cards come as a shock for some
10. Count drags on long after the election's over
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Eat local this Thanksgiving
Mavericks moving on
Canada's Great Big Sea rolls into Edmonds
A. Murphy finishes 2nd in volleyball
Art Walk features music, demonstrations
EAT LOCAL: Getting the goods
Lynnwood HS history teacher Vic Bennet dies
Wildcats head to semis
CSO Chamber annual show slated Nov. 23
The Enterprise Online Newspaper


$5 Off
Stylecut

20% Off Dinner
Up to $75 Value!

Lube, Oil & Filter
Buy 1 - Get 1 FREE

$1 off French Dip
$4.99 Burger Basket

25% off Bath & Groom
New Customers

$5 OFF
Lunch or Dinner

FREE 6 lb. Pad w/
30yd Carpet Purchase

Oil - Snohomish County
Low Prices - Fill Now!

15% Off
All Repairs!

$2 OFF
at Box Office
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes

ADVERTISEMENT