| HeraldNet - Snohomish County's online news source |
 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010 5:17 pm |
ADVERTISEMENT |
|||||||||
 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Local News 
|
|||||||||
Cost of dispute falls on Monroe The city, already facing a deficit, has been ordered to pay the legal fees of an open-government activist. MONROE — The meter has been running for more than three years.The city has spent at least $76,295 on attorneys who have withheld information from Meredith Mechling, a local open government activist. Now a state appeals court has ruled in Mechling’s favor, and the city will have to pay her legal fees, about $110,000 so far. The expense comes at a bad time for Monroe. The city’s projected 2010 budget deficit grew to $290,000 on Tuesday, when the City Council noticed revenue estimates included money tied to a big-box store yet to be built. Mechling offered to settle the case against the city for $192,950 — the cost of her attorney fees plus about $84,000 in penalties for violating the public records law. The City Council rejected the offer on Tuesday, with City Councilman Mitch Ruth the sole dissenting vote. “No matter what the dollar amount is, it’s going to have a negative impact on this upcoming fiscal year,” Ruth said Thursday. City Attorney Phil Olbrechts called the offer inflated. He believes the city will save money by letting a lower court set the price tag. The court could tell the city it only needs to pay a portion of Mechling’s fees and charge the city less severe penalties, Olbrechts said. “The city’s interest at this point is to spend as little more money on this as possible,” Olbrechts said. The case itself relates to e-mails sent among City Council members and other officials in 2005. Mechling was concerned that debate that should have been held in public was being conducted online. She requested dozens of documents. The city gave her some, but redacted information in e-mails that had been sent from personal accounts. Other e-mails were withheld outright, with the city claiming attorney-client privilege. Mechling sued for the information in 2006. A Snohomish Superior Court judge backed the city and Mechling appealed. “I am tenacious,” she said. Mechling was rewarded by a three-judge panel. The state Court of Appeals unanimously agreed in an Oct. 26 decision that Monroe must hand over the e-mails. Mechling — the wife of former City Councilman Marc Mechling and treasurer of Mayor Donnetta Walser’s failed re-election campaign — faulted the legal advice given to Monroe. The city doesn’t have an in-house attorney, instead hiring counsel from the Seattle firm Ogden Murphy Wallace on a variable hourly rate. Lawyers with the firm, including Olbrechts, and city officials said they couldn’t discuss the specifics of the case until it is completely resolved. The cost to settle the case — to pay penalties and cover legal expenses — will come out of Monroe’s general fund, city officials said. Those tax dollars support departments such as the police, parks and planning. Those departments are already being squeezed. With the 2010 deficit at $290,000, taxpayers may feel the pinch too, as the city considers a new tax and more furlough days for city staff. Many expect the final bill on Mechling’s case to arrive in 2010. Until then, Mechling will wait. “It seems silly to keep that meter running,” she said. “It seems silly that it has gone on as long as it has.” Andy Rathbun: 425-339-3455, arathbun@heraldnet.com |
- A revolutionary 747
- Fire breaks out at Everett car dealer
- Everett rethinks boutique wineries
- A tidy lawn could be law in Lynnwood
- Snohomish County's bargain housing won't last
- Boeing's 747-8 takes off after weather delay
- Plan for I-5 closures this week
- A new bowling alley for Monroe?
- Lake Stevens man homeless after fire
- I-5 bridge joint may give you a jolt, but it isn't damaged
- Vote on school levies by Tuesday
(11) - A tidy lawn could be law in Lynnwood (10)
- Lynnwood sets height limit on grass: 8 inches (5)
- Everett police officers cleared in 2008 shooting death (5)
- 1949 travel aid shows how few places blacks were welcome in Washington (4)
- I-5 bridge joint may give you a jolt, but it isn't damaged (4)
- Everett rethinks boutique wineries (4)
- County archive software paid for but waiting for set-up (3)
- Three politicians who want Gregoire's job in 2012 (3)
- Toyota has powerful D.C. friends (3)
- Edmonds educator, famous announcer dies
- Mill Creek to appeal ruling on annexation
- Through the air, with the greatest of ease
- E-W thriving under new coach
- The path to citizenship
- EUUC puts on ‘Pants & Shoes’
- Wolfpack wins the ‘Battle'
- Lynnwood’s annexation plans OK’d
- Arlington's Cascade Valley Hospital celebrates expansion, national award and 100 years of service
- Business Licences Feb. 2010
- Technology tips for launching your own business
- Business Events Feb. 2010
- Tech Talk: No excuse today for going without a Web site
- State already raising fees and rates that restrict business growth
- Some legislators again targeting people’s initiative petition rights
|
 
|
|
|
|
| TODAY'S TOP JOBS |
| View All Top Jobs |
| Top Cars |
|
| Top Homes |
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|Contact Us
|Advertiser Services
|Home Delivery
|Newsstand Locations
|Classifieds
|Feedback
|About the Company
|Work@the Herald
|Site Map |
|
COMMENTS
Log in or register to post a new comment.
To read other terms and conditions, click here
"City Attorney Phil Olbrechts called the offer inflated".
The only thing here inflated is the ego of the City attorney. When you have 2 public records requests for the same documents you can't give one request all the documents and not the other and then hope you don't get caught. He got caught
"He believes the city will save money by letting a lower court set the price tag".
Is this the same lower court that ruled the city had done no wrong?
So he is beating hard earned taxpayer dollars this same court will stand on the same laws after a higher court ruled the lower court wrong?
Yep lets run the bill up some more and waste more taxpayer dollars
by going back to court with all the attorneys plus more court costs that will bring down the cost of the price tag.
This guy has given advice from the start and look where it's gotten them.
This all started over 3 council members Minnick, Zimmerman and Berger with the help of Olbrechts
to speed up and get rid of the ethcis board.
What was the council thinking when they voted?
Do they not see the big picture here.
whitebear | Nov 13, 2009 9:29 am | 0 replies | Request removal
Post reply
If elected and appointed government officials could be charged individually for wrong doings, and they were not allowed to pay for their defense with taxpayer money, I wonder if issues like this would lessen?
The "Elected" can behave badly simply because the cost to them is minimal. We should be outraged every time these things happen.
We're supposed to feel bad and become angry at the plaintiff because of the impact on city services? How rediculous! Get mad at the city!
william monger | Nov 13, 2009 7:12 am | 0 replies | Request removal
Post reply
Just think- Monroe's deficit would be cut by more than half if they had complied to begin with. Monroe- you're a bunch of winners!
R N | Nov 13, 2009 6:58 am | 0 replies | Request removal
Post reply
...or any other city.
People need to keep in mind... when you work for government, we, joe public, have EVERY RIGHT to view every little thing you do. You can't hide behind your good ol'boys/girls club anymore. The walls are crashing down.
The sad part about this is how Monroe illegally used tax payer funds to fight this in court, adding up into the hundreds of thousands. All over what? A few E-mails? Come on. What a joke.
Publish the Emails & let's see what all the comotion is about!
cme everett | Nov 13, 2009 1:30 am | 1 replies | Request removal
Post reply
Elected Officials 101 should start with a lesson in correspondence both paper and e-mail; what they could reasonably expect to remain private - that is, basically very little. Especially with e-mail that can be forwarded to sites around the world in seconds.
It is a lesson for other government entities to remind their staff and the elected officials to think before they e-mail (or Twitter or whatever): is there anything in this message that I don't want the world to see?
T G | Nov 13, 2009 6:07 am | 0 replies | Request removal
Post reply