Shen Yun Contest

Enter to win two tickets to see Shen Yun April 3-5, 2015, at McCaw Hall

Fill out my online form.

*No purchase necessary to enter to win. Winner will be selected by a random drawing and will be notified by phone or email.

The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.


Published: Thursday, November 18, 2010, 12:21 a.m.

Monroe school-zone cameras hot topic at council meeting

MONROE — The hot issue at Tuesday night’s City Council meeting was not even on the agenda.
About 30 people came to talk about traffic-enforcement cameras installed outside two elementary schools last week. The majority of people who spoke complained about the cameras, saying they are only being installed to make the city money, not to make the schools safer.
Activist Tim Eyman asked the council to call for a vote so the local community has a voice in this issue.
“Treating citizens like an ATM shatters the sense of a community,” he said to the council.
Councilman Tom Williams lashed out against Eyman, accusing him of spreading lies and demanding a public apology from him.
Williams said only one person had contacted him about the cameras before Eyman intervened.
“I received only one phone call about the red-light cameras in my 11 months as a council member,” he said.
Arizona-based company Redflex Traffic Systems put up the cameras outside Frank Wagner Elementary School at 115 Dickinson Road and Fryelands Elementary School at 15286 Fryelands Blvd. The company started recording last week but it has stopped, city administrator Gene Brazel said.
Drivers caught violating traffic laws during this period were only given a warning.
Mayor Robert Zimmerman said he thinks the city should have a public hearing to talk about the cameras. The council did not set a date for such a hearing or make any decisions about the cameras. The council had signed a contract with Redflex about a year ago.
“My responsibility is to enact policy approved by the council but nothing is final until residents of Monroe have spoken,” Zimmerman said.
In the meeting, seven people voiced their opinions about the traffic-enforcement cameras. Only two of those said they were from Monroe.
Lewis Roane of Monroe was against the cameras: “It’s a snooping device and I don’t want to see it.”
Wayne Rodland, also of Monroe, was in favor of the cameras at schools so children could be safe. He described an accident that occurred a couple of years ago outside Frank Wagner Elementary where a child was badly injured.
“With cameras, I am sure this would have not happened,” he said.
Alejandro Dominguez: 425-339-3422; dominguez@ heraldnet.com.
Story tags » MonroeTraffic Safety

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...
HeraldNet Classifieds