OK for opposition to impose will?

I had to chuckle at the letter writer Friday who complained that state lawmakers were imposing their will on citizens of this state by approving a law on gay marriages, and according to the writer, doing so contrary to God’s word. Apparently the writer missed the fact that he and like-minded people were not allowed to impose their will on others by not being asked for their blessing for an activity that in no way directly affects him. He also seems to have completely missed that part of the U.S. Constitution designed to separate matters of faith and governance.

While I am heterosexual, at least one major faith holds that I should not be married to the wonderful woman who said “I do” to me over 16 years ago, since we are both divorced from our respective first spouses. Additionally, those who argue that the purpose of marriage is to procreate and raise children must also take offense with us. My wife’s child from her first marriage is grown and moved out before I married his mother, and as I near the half century mark, I still have no desire to father children, and my wife does not want to bear any more. According to these people, apparently my wife and I are both to be condemned because we happen to love one another, and for us, that is just fine.

I understand some people disagree with the notion of gay marriage. To those people, I suggest doing what I did: marry a person of the opposite sex.

Tom Pacher

Coupeville

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Canceled flights on a flight boards at Chicago O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, on Friday, Nov. 7, 2025. Major airports appeared to be working largely as normal on Friday morning as a wave of flight cancellations hit the U.S. (Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times)
Editorial: With deal or trust, Congress must restart government

With the shutdown’s pain growing with each day, both parties must find a path to reopen government.

Welch: Taking the initiative for parents and fair play

Two proposed state ballot measures would strengthen parents’ rights and protect girls’ sports.

Comment: Here’s what ‘losing’ shutdown looks like for Democrats

They didn’t get an ACA deal, but they kept the economic message, leaving the GOP to answer for health care costs.

Saunders: Trump has himself to blame for Newsom’s Prop. 50 win

The president’s thirst for more GOP House seats sparked a backlash that Newsom can ride to 2028.

Comment: Supreme Court’s silence on gay marriage speaks volumes

Dobbs removed a block in the Jenga tower of ‘substantive due rights.’ The same-sex marriage block appears safe.

French: The podcast that surrendered the GOP to its fate

Actually, it’s the ideological split following Tucker Carlson’s interview of Nick Fuentes that sealed it.

Warner Bros.
"The Lord of the Rings"
Editorial: Gerrymandering presents seductive temptation

Like J.R.R. Tolkein’s ‘One Ring,’ partisan redistricting offers a corrupting, destabilizing power.

A Flock camera captures a vehicle's make, model and license plate that police officers can view on computers. The city of Stanwood has paused use of Flock cameras while lawsuits over public records issues are sorted out. (Flock provided photo)
Editorial: Law enforcement tool needs review, better controls

Data from some Flock cameras, in use by police agencies, were gained by federal immigration agencies.

Klein: Democrats had the upper hand. Why did they give in now?

Trump has a higher tolerance for others’ pain than Democrats do. And they made their point with voters.

Recalling the bravery of nation’s first veterans

In the year 1768 there were a lot of Americans involved with… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.