Taxing highest earners is wrong

April 15 is almost here. For many of us this date has no real significance. To me it has a profound impact on my perspective of what America has become. It marks a day where 47 percent of our citizenship will literally pay nothing in federal income taxes.

That’s right, we all get the benefits but only those deemed worthy will pay the price. You have heard the statistics, the top earners (those over $366,000 income) will pay 73 percent of all income tax revenues. I don’t earn that much, but I detest the fact that others pay for any benefit I receive in such a lop-sided way. I earn income from many of those in that bracket that take risks, and create jobs for me and others like me. To penalize them is to penalize me in a indirect fashion.

I don’t know of many people employed by low-income people. Do you? French political thinker and historian Alexis de Tocqueville warned us about this over 150 years ago. In his book “Democracy in America” he warned that our great experiment in representative government and the rule of law would be over when the people of America figured out that they could use their votes to take stuff away from their fellow Americans.

Our president has pushed tax cuts for low- and middle-income families and tax increases for the wealthy, arguing that wealthier taxpayers fared well in the past decade, so “it’s time to pay up.” The Bush tax cuts were nothing more than a favor to the wealthy who dare to earn more money. Instead, doesn’t that money belong to the wealthy people who earn it? Why is it “time to pay up” when the top 10 percent of earners already pay 73 percent in income taxes?

Don Thompson

Lake Stevens

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Jan. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

caddyBurke: Work as a young caddy allowed a swing at life skills

Along with learning blackjack, Yiddish and golf’s finer points, it taught the art of observation.

Comment: From start, nation has relied on little ‘Common Sense’

Paine’s pamphlet laid out the case for independence, principles that the nation needed over its 250 years.

Comment: Wind energy scores win in court, but long fight ahead

A judge ruled against a Trump order to shut down a project, but projects still face his opposition.

Comment: Trump’s credit card cap would throw weakest to sharks

Trump’s demand would cut credit access for many borrowers, leaving them to even harsher options.

Comment: Keeping silence against injustice invites more injustice

Many fear consequences for speaking out, but far worse consequences are risked by tacit approval.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support of Everett schools’ bond, levy shapes student success

As a proud parent of daughters who began their Everett Public Schools… Continue reading

New pharmacy at Everett clinic site will aid patients

I applaud our local pharmacist Sovit Bista for opening Robin Hood Pharmacy… Continue reading

Goldberg: ICE killing of Renee Good meant as message for us all

Civil rights, not just of immigrants, but of all Americans are being curtailed. Protest no longer is protected speech.

Comment: DOJ’s voter info demand a data breach waiting to happen

A centralized database of sensitive information is prone to abuse, theft and human error.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.