To preserve Internet freedom

The Internet has proven itself valuable in two significant ways: promoting democratic expression and fueling innovation. Despite rhetorical clouds that are forming, we should keep our eyes on these two brass rings.

Let’s pretend we’re not debating the jargony topic known as “net neutrality.” Instead, let’s just concentrate on the values of freedom and commerce. Both of these values are bolstered as most of the world gets access to the Internet.

It now is impossible to bottle up information and opinions. Schools and churches can’t do it. Oppressive regimes and desperate despots can’t do it. The NSA can’t even do it. When people can connect to the Internet, they are empowered to share knowledge and air grievances.

In the realm of business, the Internet has fostered entrepreneurship, super charged productivity and spawned a new breed of investors. Forty years ago, could most business persons have even guessed what a “startup” was? But the Internet doesn’t come free.

Corporations that invested in Internet infrastructure want a financial return. For instance, they’d like to sell fast transmission service to companies that are willing to pay top dollar, and force poorer competitors to rely on sluggish service.

It is easy to see how this would benefit established companies, like Time Warner Cable, while crippling startups, nonprofits and independent content creators (maybe your nephew, who’s launching that business from his garage). How far could this go? If an Internet provider is seeking a franchise from a foreign government, could it offer to ban some political or religious content from the Internet altogether?

The Federal Communications Commission tried to write rules to preserve a level playing field. Mega-corporations dragged the agency into court earlier this year, and a judge decided the regulations exceeded the FCC’s authority.

Ahhh, what’s a federal commissioner to do? Unfortunately, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler decided to throw out the baby — but keep the bathwater. He’s now circulating a draft proposal that would prohibit Internet providers from banning any users outright, but otherwise allow most forms of financial discrimination.

Critics, like advocacy group Free Press, point out the FCC has other options. For instance, it could undo an earlier decision and try to classify Internet providers as “common carriers,” the same as phone companies.

For the FCC to take a fair approach to net neutrality, it will need support and legal clarifications from Congress, where a majority has usually grasped the need to protect online innovation and freedom. This is not the time to abandon those commitments.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Sept. 24

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Daydream is over; GOP must work with Democrats on ACA fix

Editorial: The Senate should end its latest ACA repeal effort and continue bipartisan talks.

Viewpoints: Who’s going to clean up Equifax’s mess?

You are, for starters. But there are things that credit agencies could do to secure your data.

Commentary: Include employee profit-sharing in tax reform

Tying corporate tax reform to profit-sharing would provide a fairer share for the middle class.

Commentary: Give retail marijuana balanced consideration

Retail sale of cannabis is up to Snohomish voters, and there are reasons to support it.

Will: America’s engine is being slowed by complacency

The Great Enrichment is being superseded by the Great Flinch, a recoil against friction and change.

Robinson: The GOP’s health care proposals keep getting worse

It’s hard to find anyone who knows anything about health insurance who likes this monstrous creation.

Parker: 25 years later, woman’s disappearance fresh in mind

Over the years, the work to find Dail Dinwiddie evolved into efforts to find and protect others.

Keillor: Voices in unison sing out our desire for common good

When you stand in a crowd and sing, it does pull people together.

Most Read