USA: Debate is in our DNA

It’s the Fourth of July, and so, as we stand at our grills and look at rainbow-colored explosions in the sky, let’s also reflect on what makes us the same: our differences.

Don’t worry. This isn’t some after-school special. We’re not going to encourage you to celebrate one another’s partisan beliefs. No, we’re encouraging you to disagree, plain and simple. It’s the American thing to do.

As Joseph J. Ellis wrote in his Pulitzer Prize winning book “Founding Brothers,” America was founded on an argument. From the start, our country was the site of messy struggles between competing ideologies, all aiming to define the concept of freedom.

Those arguments continue today. At times, we’re told that they have never been worse — that our divisions are so severe we can’t accomplish anything anymore. We disagree.

For one, our divisions have always run deep. We have had some terrific and terrible arguments with each other over this country.

Take the classic example of Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr, two of Ellis’ “Founding Brothers.” Hamilton wound up in a duel with Burr because he had libeled his political rival. Hamilton died over their disagreement. It’s hard to imagine a similar eruption between U.S. Sens. Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell.

Then there’s Abraham Lincoln, who was called a warmonger, a president not interested in peace — and that was by his fellow citizens in the North. As the Library of Congress notes, Lincoln was so sure he would lose re-election, he drafted a sealed memo to his cabinet months before voting began, pledging to support the rival who defeated him.

Of course, he won. He was inaugurated into a second term, ended the Civil War and was shot dead by a political dissident, John Wilkes Booth, all in the space of six weeks.

When you consider how severe our differences have been, it’s easier to put our current divisions into context. Our disagreements run deep but rarely boil over. There have been no riots in the streets over the health care decision, just back-slapping on one side, soft curses on the other.

And that’s good, because we think there is room for disagreement in our complex society. Our debates — over immigration, marriage rights, stem cells — as maddening as they can be, give our country shape and, more often than not, move us forward.

Today, our country is 236 years old, and we’re still arguing about it. So what do we think freedom means?

We think it means we have the ability to disagree. We think the argument is the answer.

Now discuss.

Editor’s note: This editorial has been corrected from the original version to reflect the country’s age at 236.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Warner Bros.
"The Lord of the Rings"
Editorial: Gerrymandering presents seductive temptation

Like J.R.R. Tolkein’s ‘One Ring,’ partisan redistricting offers a corrupting, destabilizing power.

Schwab: Trump continues course blithely as voters begin to rouse

Against a backdrop of Democratic election wins, Trump continued with the same old, same old.

Democracy is worth staying, fighting for

In response to a recent letter to the editor suggesting we offer… Continue reading

Issue of Epstein files hasn’t gone away for Trump

I really don’t care about your politics but I’m really concerned that… Continue reading

Bouie: Election shows Trump as albatross around GOP’s neck

Voters are telling Trump and Republicans that they’ve baldy misread the mandate of the 2024 election.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Stephens: Why do dumb ideas — from left and right — persist?

A little reflection on past failures ought to be enough to have us keep searching for solutions.

Comment: Food banks are indispensable, but can’t replace SNAP

SNAP has been the most effective anti-poverty program in U.S. history. Its work must be restored.

Comment: California’s gerrymander is sleazy, but necessary

And, as Tuesday’s vote shows, it had the support of a majority of Californians who oppose Trump’s agenda.

Comment: The devil for GOP is in the details of the election

If they care to listen, Republicans were given a warning about their prospects in the 2026 midterms.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.