Make permits predictable

Think about your last commercial airplane trip and the minor hassles you endured just to reach your seat.

You had your paperwork and baggage checked. You passed through security screening and surrendered your privacy and (perhaps) your dignity. And then you sat around the boarding area, wondering if they were ever going to announce your flight. Or at least tell you why it was delayed.

Well, for many businesses, the permitting process is not very different.

For decades, politicians from both major parties have trumpeted the need for streamlined permitting throughout regulatory agencies. Many Democrats, who wish to be seen as “business friendly,” are determined to demonstrate that government is actually capable of efficiency. And many Republicans, unabashed advocates for business, hew to the belief that government works best when it gets out of the way.

Last week, the State Auditor’s office released a performance audit of regulatory agencies that finds room for improvements in state permitting procedures. Specifically, it determines that agencies often fail to provide businesses with useful information about how much time securing a permit will take — sometimes because the agencies themselves don’t reliably know.

The audit recommends that agencies begin collecting data and publishing information about permit time frames, providing more assistance to applicants early in the process, and tracking their own performance in order to identify and eliminate bottlenecks.

The report also notes that some of the 14 state agencies responsible for granting permits have instituted useful policies, and these “leading practices” should be shared with other offices.

It boils down to treating permit applicants the way any smart business treats valued customers. When we order merchandise, we want to know when it will arrive. When we drop our car off at the shop, we want to see a good-faith cost estimate for the repairs. But there is more at stake here than simply thawing the often icy relationship between businesses and bureaucracy.

Regulations exist to protect general health, safety and order. They help ensure our food is pure, our water is clean, our roads are safe and our property values are protected. But it is no secret that “regulation” has become a dirty word among those who would place more faith in private enterprise than they do government. (Never mind product recalls, hazardous waste spills or food-borne illnesses.)

Poor administration can taint otherwise worthwhile regulations. A permitting process that burdens businesses with delays and uncertainties further undercuts confidence in the overall system. Legislators and public-spirited state regulators should embrace and adopt the kinds of procedural improvements recommended in the State Auditor’s report.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, May 10

A sketchy look at the newss of the day.… Continue reading

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Social Security’s good news? Bad news delayed a bit

Congress has a little additional time to make sure Social Security is solvent. It shouldn’t waste it.

Schwab: The Everett Clinic lost more than name in two sales

The original clinic’s physician-owners had their squabbles but always put patient care first.

Bret Stephens: Why Zionists like me can thank campus protesters

Their stridency may have ‘sharpened the contradictions,’ but it drove more away from their arguments.

Saunders: Voters need to elect fiscal watchdogs to Congress

Few in Washington, D.C., seem serious about the threat posed by the national debt. It’s time for a change.

Charles Blow: Will young voters stick with Biden despite rift?

Campus protests look to peel away young voters for Biden, but time and reality may play in his favor.

Michalle Goldberg: Why senators need to stop anti-semitism act

The application of a standard against anti-semitism was meant as tool, not a basis for legislation.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Nicholas Kristof: Biden must press Israel on Gaza relief

With northern Gaza in a ‘full-blown famine,’ the U.S. must use its leverage to reopen crossings to aid trucks.

David French: Greene, MAGA crowd not as powerful as they think

Speaker Mike Johnson and some Republicans are finding they can stand against the party’s fringe.

Jamelle Bouie: Trump will require one thing of a running mate

Most presidential candidates seek to balance the ticket; for Trump it’s loyalty and a willingness to lie.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.