Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on May 1. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch / The New York Times)

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on May 1. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch / The New York Times)

Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

By The Herald Editorial Board

Recent action by the Biden administration and in the U.S. Senate seeks some overdue changes in how marijuana is addressed by the federal government, especially in how that regulation is applied to Washington state’s own laws that legalized cannabis for retail sale and recreational use a decade ago.

Both moves have been viewed by some as election-year political overtures to “the youth vote,” but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t some sensible justifications for many of the proposed changes.

The Biden administration announced last month that it would move to “reschedule” marijuana, reducing its classification from a narcotic on par with heroin and LSD — with no medical or research value — to one comparable to prescription drugs that include ketamine, Tylenol with codeine and anabolic steroids. This wouldn’t legalize marijuana under federal law but would reduce its classification and treatment from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug and would loosen federal rules, including restrictions that have complicated and limited medical and scientific research of cannabis, its uses and its effects on mental and physical health.

President Biden and Vice President Harris invited criticism of pandering to the “hip kids” with “reefer slang,” noted The Washington Post, by tweeting the proposal at 4:20 p.m. on April 20. The term 4-20 serves as code for marijuana. (That the slang has been around since the 1970s, should tell you something of the age of the “kids” we’re talking about.)

But the seriousness of the proposal was backed up last week by Attorney General Merrick Garland, who’s about as no-nonsense on the subject of drugs as Sgt. Joe Friday of “Dragnet” fame. Garland announced the Department of Justice would seek the rule change, the process for which will include a public comment period and review by a federal judge before taking effect.

Lowering cannabis to Schedule III status would allow marijuana businesses, such as growers, processors and retailers in Washington state to deduct business expenses on federal taxes; would remove past marijuana convictions as a barrier to government employment, federal housing and visas and would make it easier for scientists to obtain, store and study supplies of marijuana, the Washington State Standard reported.

That research is among the more important changes, because it would “translate to more research on the benefits and risks of cannabis for the treatment of medical conditions,” Dr. Andrew Monte, associate director of Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Safety, told NPR.

Senate Democrats are now attempting to take those moves even farther with a legislative proposal that would remove cannabis from the list of controlled drugs altogether, legalizing it federally.

In addition to much of what rescheduling the drug to Schedule III would do, the legislation — Senate Bill 4226, the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act — would shift federal oversight of cannabis from the Drug Enforcement Administration to a federal alcohol and tobacco tax and trade bureau; establish a Center for Cannabis Producers to regulate production, distribution and sale of marijuana products; and instruct the Food and Drug Administration to set labeling standards and create programs to prevent marijuana use among youths.

It’s not clear, however, if the bill would fold in provisions of earlier legislation sought in recent years — the SAFE Banking Act — that would allow cannabis businesses freer access to banking; or if it would just make the issue moot. Because of current federal restrictions, banks even in states where cannabis is legal decline to offer services to marijuana growers, processors and retailers. In Washington state that means up to $1.5 billion in transactions are done on a strictly cash basis, which has left retail operations in particular open to smash-and-grab thefts and robberies.

There are limitations and questions on both proposals that require more consideration and additional provisions.

For example, while reclassifying marijuana would make it easier for researchers to study cannabis, those scientists would still be limited to a few federally licensed providers of marijuana. That could limit the supply for study of the full range of cannabis products, including extracts and edibles, that are now available with much higher potency of THC, cannabis’ psychoactive compound, than leaf marijuana.

Research has been limited but more of it is pointing toward THC’s potentially harmful effects for young people whose brains aren’t fully developed until they are at least 25 years of age.

“It’s just getting worse in terms of the number of kids who are being impacted by cannabis because the potency is so high. We’re now seeing many more mental health issues — schizophrenia, psychosis, depression, anxiety,” Dr. Leslie Walker-Harding of Seattle Children’s told The Seattle Times last December. “I’ve seen it and it’s scary.”

Debate remains on cannabis’ health effects, which is why much more data, research and study are necessary.

And while 17 Senate Democrats, including Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., are backing the recent legislation, the SAFE Banking Act’s multi-year struggle for passage should inform those lawmakers that full legalization of cannabis will be a long battle. Better to take smaller steps toward that goal by focusing efforts on the cannabis banking bill — which had bipartisan support in the Senate near the end of last year — and get it passed first.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Feb. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Rivian, based in Irvine, Calif., has introduced its new R2 models, smaller and more affordable SUVs. (Rivian)
Editorial: Open electric vehicle market to direct sales

Legislation would allow EV makers to sell directly to customers, making lease or purchase easier.

Comment: No one saw Musk’s DOGE rampage coming or its threat

With no formal grant of authority, Musk is making cuts without fully understanding the consequences.

Douthat: Trump is chasing off lawyers he’ll need at some point

The deal to clear Adams serves Trump only as a way of identify whom he can consider loyal in the DOJ.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

President Donald Trump listens alongside Elon Musk as he explains the administration’s cost-cutting efforts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. Musk has for weeks posted on social media about government spending, often amplifying and seeding false information. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
Comment: This crisis can’t be left to courts alone

The courts can uphold the law, but they can’t match the speed of the executive branch in tearing down systems.

Eco-nomics: Climate change is making insurance a risky bet

Keeping home insurance affordable amid climate change will take adaptation to threats and broader efforts.

The Buzz: When you gotta boogie, best to shake it off, kid

A pasquidadian review of the week’s news.

Stick with solutions to homelessness that have heart

A friend of mine, a poet from Leningrad who was born during… Continue reading

SAVE Act would restrict voting rights

As a mother, I am flabbergasted by the continued and increasing attacks… Continue reading

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.