A winner for all, especially women

It’s not much of a stretch for us to say the Affordable Care Act is one of the most significant pieces of legislation for women in our lifetimes. Not because of the battles we fought to get it to the president’s desk or because of the size or scope of the law. But because of the tangible and positive impact it has had, and will continue to have, on the health and well-being of American women and their families.

Last month, the law celebrated its fourth anniversary, serving as a stark reminder of where our nation’s health-care system was four short years ago — insurance companies had all the leverage, and, too often, women paid the price.

Thanks to the ACA, for the first time, women, not their insurance companies, are fully in charge of their health care. This is why we feel strongly that we can’t go back to the way things were.

Unfortunately, there are efforts under way all across the country to severely undermine a woman’s access to some of the critical and lifesaving services provided by the ACA. And no provision of this law has faced quite as many attacks as the idea of providing affordable, quality reproductive health services to the women of America.

We’ve seen attempt after attempt to eliminate access to abortion services and low-cost birth control designed to restrict a woman’s ability to make personal decisions about her own care. This means that now more than ever it is our job to protect these kinds of decisions for women, to fight for women’s health, and ensure that women’s health does not become a political football.

For this reason, we were proud to lead members of our caucus in filing an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in two cases brought by CEOs who want to take away their employees’ right to insurance coverage for birth control, which is guaranteed under the ACA.

Allowing a woman’s boss to call the shots about her access to birth control should be inconceivable to all Americans in this day and age, and takes us back to a place in history when women had no voice or choice. We have been able to directly link comprehensive preventive care, including birth control, to declines in maternal and infant mortality, reduced risk of ovarian cancer, better overall health outcomes, and far fewer unintended pregnancies and abortions — which is a goal we all should share.

In fact, contraception was included as a required preventive service in the ACA on the recommendation of the independent, nonprofit Institute of Medicine and other medical experts, because it is essential to the health of women and families.

What’s at stake in this case before the Supreme Court is whether a CEO’s personal beliefs can trump a woman’s right to access free or low-cost contraception under the ACA. We strongly believe that every American deserves to have access to high quality health-care coverage regardless of where they work.

If these bosses are allowed to evade this law, what would happen to other legal protections for employees? Could an employer decide not to cover HIV treatment? Could an employer opt out of having to comply with anti-discrimination laws? Corporations must not be able to use religion as a license to discriminate.

We are proud to be joined in filing the brief by 17 other senators who were in office when Congress enacted the religious protections through the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993 and when we made access to women’s health care available through the ACA in 2010. We know that Congress did not intend for a corporation, or its shareholders, to restrict a women’s access to preventive health care.

Improving access to birth control is good health and economic policy. While many of our colleagues believe repealing the ACA and access to reproductive health services is a political winner for them, the truth is that the law is a winner for women, men, children, and our health-care system. We can’t turn back the clock on the critical services this law provides. Politics should not matter when it comes to making sure Americans get the care they need at a cost they can afford.

Democratic senators Patty Murray of Washington and Barbara Boxer of California wrote this for McClatchy-Tribune News Service.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Can county be trusted with funds to aid homeless?

In response to the the article (“Snohomish County, 7 local governments across… Continue reading

Allow transgender military members to serve country

The Supreme Court has allowed Donald Trump to implement a ban on… Continue reading

Pope Leo XIV, in his first public appearance after he was elected, waves from the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica in Vatican City, on Thursday, May 8, 2025. Robert Francis Prevost was elected the 267th pope of the Roman Catholic Church on Thursday, becoming the first pope from the U.S. (Gianni Cipriano/The New York Times)
Comment: Catholicism at a crossroads in new pope’s own nation

Can a U.S.-born pope bring ‘cultural’ Catholics back to the fold and heal divisions in the church?

The Buzz: We have a new pope and Trump shtick that’s getting old

This week’s fashion question: Who wore the papal vestments better; Trump or Pope Leo XIV?

Comment: We need housing, habitats and a good buffer between them

The best way to ensure living space for people, fish and animals are science-based regulations.

Comment: Museums allow look at the past to inform our future

The nation’s museums need the support of the public and government to thrive and tell our stories.

Comment: Better support of doula care can cut maternal deaths

Partners need to extend the reach of the state’s Apple Health doula program, before and after births.

Forum: Permit-to-purchase firearm law in state would save lives

Requiring a permit to purchase will help keep guns in responsible hands and reduce suicides and homicides.

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: County had no choice but to sue over new grant rules

New Trump administration conditions for homelessness grants could place county in legal jeopardy.

Scott Peterson walks by a rootball as tall as the adjacent power pole from a tree that fell on the roof of an apartment complex he does maintenance for on Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Communities need FEMA’s help to rebuild after disaster

The scaling back or loss of the federal agency would drown states in losses and threaten preparedness.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.