Celebrate right for all to wed

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ended, in one sense, same-sex marriage.

Now, in every state in the union, we can use just one word: marriage, without need of any qualifier.

The high court, in a 5-4 decision, found state bans on same-sex marriages unconstitutional.

“Under the Constitution, same-sex couples seek in marriage the same legal treatment as opposite-sex couples, and it would disparage their choices and diminish their personhood to deny them this right,” wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy in the majority opinion. Kennedy was joined in the ruling by justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Kennedy, in his opinion, cites the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to link each person’s identity to her or his liberty, finding that liberty is denied when personal opposition, such as that to same-sex marriage, is enacted as law. The decision recalls another case, Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 Supreme Court decision that changed what “traditional marriage” meant to some and threw out state laws that barred interracial marriage. Chief Justice Earl Warren, in that decision, wrote: “Marriage is one of the ‘basic civil rights of man,’ fundamental to our very existence and survival.”

No one expected a unanimous decision by the court in this case, but the dissent by Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, is disheartening because it seeks to deny the legitimacy of the ruling and the legitimacy of the liberty of same-sex couples.

Roberts, in his dissent, made no claim that same-sex marriages are illegal, just that the question of opening marriage to same-sex couples should be left to state legislatures, not decided by courts.

“If you are among the many Americans — of whatever sexual orientation — who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.”

But the Constitution has everything to do with it.

Roberts may rather we wait for public opinion to favor gay marriage in all 50 states. We may be headed in that direction, regardless; a recent Washington Post-ABC poll showed 61 percent of Americans say they support the rights of same-sex couples to wed, with even larger margins among young adults.

But up until Friday’s decision, the laws of the 50 states were divided, with 37 states and the District of Columbia recognizing same-sex marriages. That split meant same-sex married couples’ rights to liberty weren’t recognized outside of those states, which made their protection under the 14th Amendment necessary.

As a nation, we have conversations ahead of us as we celebrate a more inclusive right to marry while respecting the religious liberties and beliefs of those who object to it.

But we can now celebrate all marriages and the Constitution.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

A radiation warning sign along the road near the Hanford Site in Washington state, on Aug. 10, 2022. Hanford, the largest and most contaminated of all American nuclear weapons production sites, is too polluted to ever be returned to public use. Cleanup efforts are now at an inflection point.  (Mason Trinca/The New York Times)
Editorial: Latest Hanford cleanup plan must be scrutinized

A new plan for treating radioactive wastes offers a quicker path, but some groups have questions.

Maureen Dowd: Consider the three faces of Donald Trump

Past, present and future are visibile in his countenance; an especially grim one on the cover of Time.

Paul Krugman: Still no stag and not much flation

The grumbling about inflation’s slow path to 2 percent isn’t worth steps that risk a recession.

David Brooks: Why past is prologue and protests help Trump

Today’s crowd-sourced protests muddle their message and goals and alienate the quiet disapprovers.

Jamelle Bouie: We pay price for upper-class state legislators

If we want more working-class representation, we need to make those positions more accessible.

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Michelle Goldberg: When elections on line, GOP avoids abortion

Even among the MAGA faithful, Republicans are having second thoughts on how to respond to restrictions.

Paul Krugman: Digging into the persistence of Trump-stalgia

Most Americans are better off than they were four years ago; so why doesn’t it feel that way to them?

David French: Only one candidate has a serious foreign policy

Voters will have to choose between a coherent strategy and a transactional temper tantrum.

Eco-nomics: The climate success we can look forward to

Finding success in confronting climate change demands innovation, will, courage and service above self.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.