Granite Falls should switch to city manager system

Granite Falls is being asked on the November ballot to choose between its current mayor-council form of government, and a more business-oriented council-manager form. Cities across America face this choice (a very few even choosing a third alternative, that of commission government), and for their own reasons decide one way or the other. My position is based solely on the needs, challenges and resources associated with Granite Falls. I strongly support changing from our current mayor-council approach to that of a council-manager structure.

The overriding factor in my mind is the need for efficient, effective operation of city departments. We must provide the highest possible levels of service, within the financial constraints that we face. By definition, that means having the most efficient, effective people in all roles with the city, whether their job be technical, clerical or service-related.

Our city, like any organization, runs on people-power, and the level of city performance depends on the talent and commitment of the people we have in place. That means those departments must be run like a business — people need to be hired based on their ability to contribute, developed in a manner that expands their capacity and rewarded with expanded opportunities that take advantage of their personal growth. Likewise, if they cannot meet the requirements, they need to be evaluated fairly and replaced, if necessary.

Of course, that only happens if they are hired, managed and developed by a professional — someone who understands the jobs to be done and who can evaluate performance on an ongoing basis, uninfluenced by politics.

We might be extraordinarily lucky, and might by chance vote into office every four years a mayor who has the experience and knowledge required, who has the professional management skills required, who has the financial background to facilitate both short- and long-term planning, who has the organizational experience to pursue financial grants and productive organizational relationships, who wants to do the job for a mere pittance, presumably on a part-time basis, knowing his/her tenure is only four years. Or we could deliberately hire the requisite professional city manager, as a long-term employee, held responsible for his/her results by the council, just like any business CEO is held responsible by a board of directors, and retained or released accordingly.

Make no mistake, “money” and “risk management” are large parts of the consideration. Whoever manages the city must understand the financial structure, the “ins” and the “outs”, and have the ability to use modern tools that enable sound planning. We’ve seen the effect of having newly-elected officials entering office at a time of “excess income” (big school and housing developments being built), spending freely because of the available income without insight into more “typical” times, then having times actually turn far worse than typical. The city almost went bankrupt, major structural changes were required, and a number of internal “taxes” necessarily imposed for survival.

We’re gaining back our financial health now, but only because of the unique skills and insights of a couple dedicated city employees in implementing a multi-year recovery plan.

The council-manager form of government ensures that a professional city manager can be hired with a long-term commitment to success. He/she hires, manages, develops, evaluates, and terminates (if necessary) city staff, all with the intent of long-term success of the team he/she builds. He/she manages the execution of the strategies laid out by the council, which is the elected body that establishes the overall direction, policies, and personality of the city.

The city manager is unencumbered with politics, not subject to the whim of four-year elections, and — most important of all — is paid to handle the complex full-time job of managing the city! Expecting that level of management from a part-time virtually-unpaid mayor is simply unrealistic — the risk of doing so is equivalent to betting all City resources on “red” at the casino.

Let’s elect the council representatives we trust most to set the policies and priorities for the city, give that group the responsibility to hire (and fire) a professional city manager, and enjoy continual growth and improvement in Granite Falls.

Our taxes and time are valuable commodities that deserve the best investment and management possible, by a city team professionally equipped to respond to all situations.

Fred Cruger is a resident of Granite Falls.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Comment: To save the church, let’s talk nuns, not just popes

The church can save some parishes if it allows nuns to do the ‘field hospital’ work Pope Francis talked of.

Comment: RFK Jr.’s measles strategy leading U.S. down dark path

As misinformation increases, vaccinations are decreasing, causing a rise in the spread of measles.

Comment: Energy Star a boon to consumers; of course it has to go

In it’s 30-plus years it’s saved consumers $500 billion, cut carbon emissions and actually delivers efficiency.

Comment: We need more air traffic controllers; they need AI tools

As work continues to add controllers, tailored AI assistants could help them make better decisions.

Saunders: Trump’s charm offensive won’t win over Canadians

As long as his tariffs remain in place, being polite to the prime minister won’t impress Canadians.

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: County had no choice but to sue over new grant rules

New Trump administration conditions for homelessness grants could place county in legal jeopardy.

Scott Peterson walks by a rootball as tall as the adjacent power pole from a tree that fell on the roof of an apartment complex he does maintenance for on Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Communities need FEMA’s help to rebuild after disaster

The scaling back or loss of the federal agency would drown states in losses and threaten preparedness.

FILE - This Feb. 6, 2015, file photo, shows a measles, mumps and rubella vaccine on a countertop at a pediatrics clinic in Greenbrae, Calif. Washington state lawmakers voted Tuesday, April 23, 2019 to remove parents' ability to claim a personal or philosophical exemption from vaccinating their children for measles, although medical and religious exemptions will remain. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)
Editorial: Commonsense best shot at avoiding measles epidemic

Without vaccination, misinformation, hesitancy and disease could combine for a deadly epidemic.

Can county be trusted with funds to aid homeless?

In response to the the article (“Snohomish County, 7 local governments across… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.