Viewpoints: Quantifying the risk that bacon will kill you

You have of course heard the sad news about bacon. As the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer put it Monday in a news release:

“The experts concluded that each 50 gram portion of processed meat eaten daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18 percent.”

How much is 50 grams of processed meat? In bacon terms it’s about two slices. Just to be clear, it isn’t that eating two pieces of bacon will increase your colorectal cancer risk by 18 percent. It’s that eating two pieces of bacon every day for the rest of your life will.

But here’s the important question that isn’t directly addressed in the pages and pages of information released Monday by the IARC or in any of the subsequent news coverage that I read: What’s the risk of colorectal cancer to begin with?

To illustrate how much this can matter: In 1995, the U.K.’s Committee on Safety in Medicines issued a warning that third-generation oral contraceptive pills increased the risk of thrombosis by 100 percent. What that meant was that the risk of getting thrombosis — potentially life-threatening blood clots in the legs or lungs — went from 1 in 7,000 for women taking second-generation birth control pills to 2 in 7,000 for those taking the third-generation variety.

Not a huge risk, then. But a 100 percent risk increase sounds quite ominous. As psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer describes in his book “Risk Savvy,” the warning scared many women away from the pill. One result was an estimated 13,000 additional abortions the following year in England and Wales. Another was, ironically, a lot of thrombosis cases — pregnancies and abortions are much more likely to bring on the condition than does taking a third-generation birth control pill.

Information about relative risk can be misleading, then, unless it’s presented in the context of absolute risk. So what’s the absolute risk of getting colorectal cancer? To sum up tables from the National Cancer Institute, men 60 and younger face an almost 5 percent chance of getting colorectal cancer in their lifetimes, and a greater than 2 percent chance of dying from it. For women it’s about 4.5 percent and 1.9 percent.

Colorectal cancer, then, is a relatively common and deadly disease. It tends to hit people later in life, when they’re eventually going to die of something in any case. But still, it’s worth trying to avoid. Let’s say you’re a man, you have about a 5 percent chance of eventually getting colorectal cancer, and you up your bacon consumption by two pieces a day. That increases your cancer risk to almost 6 percent — not a trivial jump.

Unlike the ill-advised and since-revoked U.S. dietary recommendations against cholesterol, these processed-meat cancer-risk estimates are based on years and years of empirical research. The 18 percent figure comes from a 2011 meta-analysis, published in the open-source journal PLOS One, of nine different studies of colorectal cancer.

It’s just an estimate, and it’s always possible that other things that processed-meat eaters tend to do — such as standing around grills full of burning charcoal — raise their cancer risk. Still, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to make changes in your diet based on this evidence (and similar but weaker evidence on the link between red meat and cancer). I like bacon a lot, but I’d rather have a 5 in 100 chance of getting colorectal cancer than a 6 in 100 chance. Good on the World Health Organization for getting the word out. What I don’t understand, though, is why they didn’t present the risks in those terms.

Justin Fox is a Bloomberg View columnist writing about business.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Glacier Peak, elevation 10,541 feet, in the Glacier Peak Wilderness of Mount Baker–Snoqualmie National Forest in Snohomish County, Washington. (Caleb Hutton / The Herald) 2019
Editorial: Sell-off of public lands a ruinous budget solution

The proposal in the Senate won’t aid affordable housing and would limit recreational opportunities.

Comment: Juneteenth holiday struggles to build on promise

The young federal holiday — and the racial equity it seeks — face unfamiliarity and anti-DEI efforts.

What’s state’s role in county funding for stadium

Is the state of Washington jamming money down the county’s throat to… Continue reading

Comment: RFK Jr.’s remake of vaccine panel puts nation at risk

Clearing out the committee and appointing those critical of vaccines will result in more outbreaks.

Comment: Immigration debacle shows failure as nation of laws

No fix will be possible until both parties stop using the crisis for their own political purposes.

Comment: Padilla right to challenge Noem’s right-wing attacks

The senator broke protocol for a news conference, but identified himself and didn’t lunge at the secretary.

In a gathering similar to many others across the nation on Presidents Day, hundreds lined Broadway with their signs and chants to protest the Trump administration Monday evening in Everett. (Aaron Kennedy / Daily Herald)
Editorial: Let’s remember the ‘peaceably’ part of First Amendment

Most of us understand the responsibilities of free speech; here’s how we remind President Trump.

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer testifies during a budget hearing before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ending Job Corps a short-sighted move by White House

If it’s jobs the Trump administration hopes to bring back to the U.S., it will need workers to fill them.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, June 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: Like a typhoon, confront the tycoon head on

As we saw this weekend, it’s best to confront storms like Trump directly and with determination.

How could anyone trust Democrats?

We expect our elected officials to be trustworthy. We grant our vote… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.