Separating hype from science in debate over sports and brain damage

  • By Ramesh Raghupathi, Eugene Hong and Thomas Trojian Special to The Philadelphia Inquirer
  • Friday, January 15, 2016 6:06pm
  • OpinionCommentarySports

We continue to hear their names: former NFL linebacker Junior Seau, Steelers Hall of Fame center Mike Webster, Eagles safety Andre Waters, Hall of Fame quarterback and sports commentator Frank Gifford. Since their deaths, they have become high-profile examples of people diagnosed with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative condition for which there is no cure and that can be diagnosed only by autopsy, after a person dies.

Former Raiders running back Maurice Jones-Drew and 49ers linebacker Chris Borland may have voluntarily removed themselves from the game based in part on concerns that continuing to play football would increase their risk of developing CTE.

In the docudrama “Concussion,” Will Smith portrays Bennet Omalu, the doctor who, among others, is credited with bringing to light the evidence of CTE in the brains of former NFL players. In doing so, he also exposed a problem that needs further evaluation to determine its significance. Now out in theaters, the film has already added fuel to a national discussion.

As many experts will agree, however, the relationship between developing CTE and playing football remains unclear. The link between the number of concussions a person sustains and the risk of developing CTE is also uncertain. A person sustaining a sports-related concussion is different from a person developing a myocardial infarction, where our ability to objectively diagnose and treat the patient in a way that will improve outcomes comes from experience and solid clinical research. We are still developing and learning the optimal means of evaluation and treatment of patients with sports-related concussions.

So we, as neuroscientists and sports-medicine clinicians, want to examine the following questions: What is our best understanding of the science on sports-related concussions? And how do we separate the science from the hype?

Here is what we know:

Postmortem analyses of the brains of some NFL and college football players demonstrate evidence of pathology, including neuronal loss, tau deposition and other findings, which are being called CTE.

Some living retired NFL players exhibit signs and symptoms of progressive neurodegenerative disease.

There is increased awareness about sports-related concussions.

Still, there are many important questions to be answered when it comes to determining the outcomes of sports-related concussions. Our studies and others from labs across the country are attempting to unravel these difficult questions about the short- and long-term effects of repeated brain trauma.

Here is what is unknown at this point:

Does a single concussion or repetitive concussions increase the risk of developing CTE?

Does a single concussion, overlapping concussions or separate multiple concussions result in permanent brain damage similar to that observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s disease)?

Is there a threshold number of hits to the head or concussions at which a child (or adult) may be at higher risk of developing CTE?

Do genetics predispose certain players to develop permanent brain damage?

Although there are a few reports that attempt to link sports-related concussions and neurodegenerative diseases, what is lacking are the controlled and rigorous prospective studies necessary to address these unanswered questions. This is important for us to establish for all athletes and other people who sustain sports-related concussions.

Where does this leave us? How do we keep sports as safe as we can and yet not limit or curtail the benefits of organized competitive physical activity? Should we as a society restrict or ban contact or collision sports, particularly for young athletes?

We propose that we need more informed discussion on these critical decisions about sports. We need to be vigilant since association is not causation. The benefits of participation in team sports are many and clear, and include providing lessons on values such as winning and losing, increasing parent-child interaction, and encouraging children to better interact with society. Furthermore, scientific evidence supports the importance of physical activity and exercise in improving brain health, particularly during the formative years.

As parents ourselves, as well as scientists and health-care providers, we are passionate about improving our understanding of sports-related concussions. While we wholeheartedly welcome the increased public awareness and societal discourse, what is further required is rigorous medical research that determines the effect of sports-related concussions on long-term outcomes. Only then can the hype be separated from the science.

Ramesh Raghupathi is a neurobiology and anatomy professor at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia. Dr. Eugene Hong is associate dean for primary care and community health at Drexel. Dr. Thomas Trojian is a professor of family, community and preventive medicine at Drexel.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Comment: Democrats get another chance to repair their brand

The skipped over AOC for a key committee post; now they can appoint a young and skilled member.

A rendering of the new vessels to be built for Washington State Ferries. (Washington State Ferries)
Editorial: Local shipyard should get shot to build state ferries

If allowed to build at least two ferries, Nichols Brothers can show the value building here offers.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, June 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: To save downtowns, find housing for those without homes

No investments will be made, no one will return unless we first solve our problem with homelessness.

Harrop: GOP states seeing red over green energy

Even as renewables add to their energy mix, Republicans are loathe to admit that it’s working.

Comment: Fundamental rights should depend on your ZIP code

While flawed, courts’ nationwide injunctions are necessary to avoid limits to rights based on where one lives.

Demonstrators gather as part of the National Law Day of Action outside the Supreme Court in Washington, May 1, 2025. (Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times)
Comment: Justice is blind; it shouldn’t be silenced

Politicians play a dangerous game by accusing judges who rule against them of defying the voters’ will.

Comment: How Biden cost Democrats the presidency

It wasn’t just a failure to confront his frailty; it was a failure to confront conventional thinking.

Solar panels are visible along the rooftop of the Crisp family home on Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: ‘Big, beautiful bill’ would take from our climate, too

Along with cuts to the social safety net, the bill robs investments in the clean energy economy.

A Lakewood Middle School eighth-grader (right) consults with Herald Opinion Editor Jon Bauer about the opinion essay he was writing for a class assignment. (Kristina Courtnage Bowman / Lakewood School District)
Youth Forum: Just what are those kids thinking?

A sample of opinion essays written by Lakewood Middle School eighth-graders as a class assignment.

State should split ferry contract to keep jobs, speed up build

On Jan. 8, Gov.-elect Bob Ferguson, transportation leaders from the Senate and… Continue reading

Has Trump read Paine’s ‘Common Sense’?

Will Donald Trump, who says he “runs the world” and approved a… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.