Here’s an argument waiting to get started

Danny Westneat is a columnist for The Seattle Times.

Recently, he wrote a column concerning the tragic series of incidents wherein children have been either seriously injured or killed due to accidental shootings.

In that column, he noted that, despite these accidental shootings, an anticipated backlash against firearms sales and ownership has not occurred and, in fact, just the opposite seems to be happening.

He wrote:

“In March and so far in April, more people have gotten concealed-pistol permits than ever.

“It’s part of an extraordinary ‘arming up’ of this state that began a few years ago and only seems to be escalating. Since 2009, the number of people licensed to carry here has jumped more than 50 percent, to about 360,000.

“Now one in 14 Washington adults is legal to pack concealed heat — nearly triple the rate of the gunslinger state of Texas.

“Gun sales are up everywhere. So much so that The New York Times just ran a feature on ‘covert carry’ clothing lines, with quick-access holster slits for the fashion-aware gun owner.”

He then mentioned conversations that he’d had with Dave Workman, a local firearms rights advocate, regarding the surge in (and possible reasons for) the escalation in gun sales.

With all of the above in mind, he ended his column by mentioning and (possibly, with a little reluctance) endorsing an idea that Mr. Workman had proposed. That idea would be to include basic firearms safety as part of the curriculum in local schools. Basically, we’d treat the issue of firearms and firearms safety as a public-health issue much the same as sex education.

At that point, you could’ve pushed me over with a feather. A realistic, rational, safe and doable proposal regarding firearms safety published in a major Seattle newspaper.

Those of you who are adamantly opposed to firearms ownership should now probably put this newspaper down for a few minutes, breathe deeply, “un-flabbergast” yourselves, and consider the fact that this is not some “off-the-wall” endorsement of an idea espoused by a “gun nut.” It’s simply a recognition of a problem we face with a reasonable and rational suggestion attached for discussion.

As a society, we’re not going to do away with firearms ownership at any time in the near future. Further, gun sales are, indeed, increasing. Many homes now have at least one — and likely more — firearms present within their walls. Kids and young adolescents are now, have always been, and will always be curious — and that curiosity extends as much to firearms as it does to sex.

Given all of this and more, I support this idea because it just seems logical that more knowledge, understanding and (yes) even basic safety training would be the hands-down default position on such an issue. This, rather than a likely immediate denunciation of such a proposal and, basically, doing nothing other than calling for more “reasonable laws” (of which there are already thousands) to be passed.

Unfortunately, I know that this idea will not sit well with everyone and that few, if any, schools or school boards will endorse it. It’s a political and societal hot potato and it would require a ton of willingness to weather the storm it would surely generate.

That said, one thing to remember is that most kids now get all of their firearms training from video games (“kill anything and everything that moves”) or Hollywood (motto: “always at the forefront of firearms safety and basic handling skills”) and that, to me, isn’t the best of all possible worlds.

Having certified firearms instructors teaching safety skills in a safe environment (there are “dummy” firearms and inert ammunition available for training purposes) couldn’t do anything but help. Too, I’d be willing to bet that many certified instructors would even volunteer their time to do this. More so if the state would step in and offer, let’s say, “no cost” Discovery Passes or reduced fishing and hunting license fees to those who’d volunteer to teach such courses.

As an aside — and given what’s happened over the past few months — I’d also offer that it might not be a bad idea for us adults to sit in on the classes, too.

It’ll never happen, though, will it?

And that’s the pity.

Larry Simoneaux lives in Edmonds. Send comments to larrysim@comcast.net.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Burke: Assessing dangers to democracy, knowing how to respond

In judging a threat consider Trump’s intent and his ability to carry out his intentions.

Oppose passage of ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ in Congress

The so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” threatens half of America’s children. (“Medicaid cuts… Continue reading

Stand up to oppose cuts to Medicaid and more

I am a senior citizen, having believed for the years of my… Continue reading

Skip the private fireworks displays, please

As everyone knows, our great country’s birthday, The Fourth of July, is… Continue reading

Comment: ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will be hard sell to public

Republicans now must explain its cuts to health coverage, SNAP and clean energy credits and additional debt.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Dowd: Trump obliterates any sense of reliance on facts, truth

Any attempt to set the record straight is met with charges of having a lack of respect and patriotism.

Saunders: Price to pay for GOP senators who defy the president

Trump wants his Bill Beautiful Bill passed; and soon. Republicans’ future may hinge on it.

Comment: GOP’s Big Beautiful Bill extreme on immigration, too

Currently, $18,000 is spent for every undocumented immigrant. The bill increases that five-fold.

Comment: Term limits in Congress would only make it weaker

Limiting terms would result in a younger Congress, but would transfer power to lobbyists and staffers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.