Civil discourse honors King

For many there may be a tinge of unease to this particular Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

Violent and fatal confrontations between black men and police in Missouri and New York were followed by sometimes-peaceful but too-often-violent protests as communities and the rest of the nation split on whether justice had been served when grand juries excused the officers involved.

Amid the shouts of “black lives matter” and “police lives matter” were familiar calls for a national conversation on race and action on inequality, justice and opportunity.

During previous King holidays we could focus our attention on community service, celebrating differences, honoring what sometimes appeared to be a distant civil rights history, topics that to differing degrees acknowledged issues of race and inequality.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Those issues have come closer to the forefront this Martin Luther King Jr. Day. And there’s no more appropriate time to discuss them.

In order to have a conversation, however, some, more than others, may need a reminder on the ground rules of civil discourse.

In December, Dr. Janice Greene, president of the Snohomish County Chapter of the NAACP, wrote a guest commentary for The Herald, commenting on the grand jury’s decision in Ferguson, Missouri, and the crisis that followed. Her hope was to begin conversations that are necessary not just in Missouri and New York but also are needed here in Snohomish County. Greene offered the commentary with full knowledge that she was opening herself up to criticism and challenges from authors of letters to the editor who sign their names and the opinions of online commenters who typically remain anonymous.

Fair comment has a value as part of that conversation. But the value of some of the online commentary was only in proving that something is broken.

One online commenter told Greene that she should consider herself lucky that racism existed because it gave her “something to live for.”

Everyone sees these issues from his or her own perspective, influenced by individual beliefs and experiences. The conversation starts by listening to and understanding how those beliefs and experiences form the opinions of those participating in a discussion. It’s a willful act to be quiet and listen to someone and make an effort to understand their point.

That’s how conversations become solutions, how solutions become reconciliation.

This is how we honor Martin Luther King Jr. And that’s something to live for.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, June 5

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A rendering of possible configuration for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Everett. (DLR Group)
Editorial: Latest ballpark figures drive hope for new stadium

A lower estimate for the project should help persuade city officials to move ahead with plans.

Comment: Republicans’ tax bill is generational theft

The focus has been on cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, but even greater harm awaits those yet to be born.

More support needed to keep care programs running

I just don’t understand the closing of an adult day health center… Continue reading

How are cuts by Trump and RFK Jr. making us healthy?

Once I recovered from the shock of a second Donald Trump term,… Continue reading

Welch’s criticism of Democrats unpersuasive

Todd Welch’s May 28 Herald commentary criticizing Gov. Bob Ferguson’s signing of… Continue reading

Comment: MAHA report’s faked research just start of problems

RFK Jr. has the notion of research backward, forcing it to fit the conspiracies he’s always believed.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, June 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: A parade for Army? Sure; but let a sibling march, too

The U.S. Merchant Marine has supplied the country’s fighting forces since the Revolutionary War.

Harrop: This isn’t the outcome that Musk likely imagined

After handing over $250 million to elect Trump, he got the job of taking heat for unpopular cuts.

Dowd: Musk moved fast and broke his own reputation

The head of the failed-DOGE experiment leaves Washington with a black eye and less respect.

Comment: GOP’s fiscal hawks get it; voters don’t care about debt

On a basic level they say they do, but they’re more concerned over inflation and cuts to their services.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.